Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mixed election results for Chavez

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 01:40 AM
Original message
Mixed election results for Chavez
Source: BBC

... Elections were held to choose new governors and more than 300 mayors across the country.

With more than 95% of votes counted, officials said supporters of Mr Chavez candidates had won in 17 states ...

The opposition won the key states of Miranda and Zulia, and well as the mayorship of Caracas - which now shifts from a Chavez supporter to an opponent ...

The outcome in two states are still two close to call.


Read more: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7745165.stm



Chávez allies score big wins in Venezuela elections
BY TYLER BRIDGES
McClatchy News Service

CARACAS -- ... Chávez's candidates won 17 of the 20 states announced late Sunday night, with the opposition winning two populous states (Miranda and Zulia), one small state (Nueva Esparta) and metropolitan Caracas where Antonio Ledezma is the new mayor ...

Chávez's party won 20 of the 23 governor's races contested in 2004, so while he won most of the races on Sunday, the opposition parties gained some ground ...

Wendys Bello, 33, voted for the government candidates because she credited Chávez with allowing her to get her high school degree next month in one of the government's free educational programs known as ''missions.'' Dixia Nava, 48, favored Chávez's candidates because of government grocery stores in poor neighborhoods that allow her to buy food at a deep discount ...

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/americas/v-fullstory/story/785055.html

Chavez leads Venezuela vote, opposition makes gains
By Saul Hudson

CARACAS, Nov 24 (Reuters) - ... The multi-party opposition held onto the two states it won at the last regional elections four years ago and wrested from the government control of the state metropolitan area around Caracas as well as the mayoralty of the capital.

The results in tight races in Venezuela's remaining two states were due to be announced later on Monday ...

The opposition fended off an aggressive Chavez campaign and retained control of the oil-producing state of Zulia, the country's most populous.

Combined with victories in the capital against veteran Chavez aides, the opposition now holds sway over major urban areas that will be pivotal in future elections. It also held on to the Caribbean tourist island state of Nueva Esparta ...

http://www.reuters.com/article/bondsNews/idUSN2347504420081124

Venezuela's Chavez Accepts Electoral Loss Of Top Posts
Monday November 24th, 2008 / 6h52
<By Raul Gallegos>

CARACAS -(Dow Jones)- Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez went on television early Monday morning to accept the results of a regional vote where his party failed to secure key state and municipal governments.

"The people have spoken again, and the winner is the Venezuelan people," Chavez said in a televised address from the headquarters of the Venezuelan United Socialist Party, or PSUV.

"We will have to propose more voting booths to make it easier for people to vote from now on," the president said, referring to a record turnout for a regional election in recent years ...

In a surprise result, opposition forces also managed to win the second-most populous state of Miranda and the Caracas municipal government, the most important municipality in the country.
Chavez insisted that this defeat proves that Venezuela's institutions do work, despite concerns from some opposition leaders of a possible electoral fraud ...

http://www.easybourse.com/bourse-actualite/marches/venezuela-s-chavez-accepts-electoral-loss-of-top-posts-567180

Chavez candidates win large majority of states in key test
November 24, 2008 - 1:46PM

... A record 65.45 percent of almost 17 million eligible voters went to the polls, said Tibisay Lucena, president of the National Electoral Council.

With 95.67 percent of votes counted nationally, the opposition kept hold of the two states it previously held and won a third, as well as the capital post.

Two more governor posts, including the populous Carabobo state, were not immediately announced ...

The total vote was for 22 governors, 328 mayors and 233 heads of regional councils for four year terms ...

http://news.theage.com.au/world/chavez-candidates-win-large-majority-of-states-in-key-test-20081124-6fl1.html

As Venezuela Votes, Chávez Turns Conciliatory
By SIMON ROMERO
Published: November 23, 2008

... “We are prepared to recognize any result,” Mr. Chávez said in televised comments after casting his vote, reminding voters that he quickly conceded defeat last year in a referendum that would have enhanced his powers. Results in more than 20 states and 328 municipalities, including several in the Caracas metropolitan area, were expected late Sunday or early Monday ...

“I am tired of Chávez treating the entire country as if it were his military barracks,” said Heriberto González, 65, a carpenter, after he voted in Petare, a sprawling patchwork of slums here ...

Miroslava Toro, 35, a resident of Petare, said: “We have problems in Venezuela, but I am certain the return of the oligarchy would make them worse. I know in my heart that Chávez cares about the poor.” Ms. Toro, a maintenance supervisor at a state health clinic, said she had voted for Mr. Chávez’s candidates.

Voting unfolded without reports of major irregularities, even if confusion emerged in some areas. In Mr. Chávez’s home state of Barinas, where his family was hoping to maintain its decade-long hold on power, his father, Hugo de los Reyes Chávez, the departing governor, said an electronic voting machine switched his choices ...

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/24/world/americas/24venez.html?_r=1&em

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why would a supposed dictator allow the opposition party to make gains?
Unless he's not a dictator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winnipegosis Donating Member (233 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Well
...it was good enough for Mugabe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Are you actually comparing the two?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
2.  "The people have spoken again, and the winner is the Venezuelan people."
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
25. Hear, Hear! Couldn't agree more!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamuti Lotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 03:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. The attempted spin control is somewhat interesting
But, I guess they have to somehow obscure the fact that PSUV once again trounced the opposition.. The evil dictator is letting them rule the capital! How obviously devious of him! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Hi Alamuti Lotus,
welcome to DU!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. Hugo Chavez's candidates leading in Venezuela elections
Hugo Chavez's candidates leading in Venezuela elections
The president's allies are ahead in 17 of 22 governor races, reflecting his continuing popularity among voters.
By Mery Mogollon and Chris Kraul
November 24, 2008

Reporting from Bogota, Colombia, and Caracas, Venezuela -- Turnout was heavy Sunday in Venezuelan state and local elections, whichwere seen as a referendum on President Hugo Chavez's decade in office and could be a decisive factor in whether he attempts to abolish term limits and extend his powers.

Late Sunday, the National Electoral Council reported that Chavez's gubernatorial candidates were leading in 17 of 22 states, two of which, Tachira and Carabobo, were too close to call. Chavez's party appeared set to lose the Caracas mayoralty, however.

A turnout of 65% set a modern record for state and local elections, the commission said. None of the results were final.

Chavez's socialist government has been facing inflation, high crime and falling oil prices, but he remains highly popular in this mineral-rich and polarized country. His gubernatorial and mayoral candidates were expected to win solid, if reduced, majorities in the nation's statehouses and city halls.

More:
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-venez24-2008nov24,0,6961907.story?track=rss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 03:49 AM
Response to Original message
6. Viva el PSUV!
!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steepler0t Donating Member (348 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. A dictator?
Who lets the opposition elect a mayor of the capital where he lives?

Chavez is losing his grip, but then he has been in office forever and his well-meaning social policys have not been all that effective for a number of reasons. (not all his fault)
He will either go into history as a hero of the people like a 21st century Bolivar when it is time to step down or he will do something stupid.
I do not think he is a stupid man, maybe idealistic. And determined. But not a dictator.

Good Frontline on PBS about him. I was a supporter for years, still am kinda. But I would like to see him fade off and leave a positive legacy for others to build upon -Democratically.

Check out the PBS Frontline video online
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dpibel Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-08 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. "Been in office forever"
As long as you define "forever" as "since 1998." Which is to say, two years longer than a two-term U.S. president.

Funny thing, that perspective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-08 04:54 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Elected December 1998, inaugurated February 18, 1999.
It seems to be just fine with some of these people that the US backed people like Alfredo Stroressner, who harbored Nazis after WWII, and violently suppressed the people of Paraguay, using torture, murders, whatever was handy to keep them all submissive.

The new President of Paraguay Fernando Lugo's three brothers were tortured and imprisoned and driven into exile, his father was persecuted under the Nazi-friendly beast Stroessner, whose Colorado Party ruled Paraguay in one unbroken line since 1947 until Lugo finally won the Presidential election last year.
Alfredo Stroessner Matiauda, whose name is also spelled Strössner or Strößner (November 3, 1912, Encarnación - August 16, 2006, Brasília) served as President of Paraguay from 1954 to 1989.

~snip~
As leader of the Colorado Party, Stroessner exercised nearly complete control over the nation's political scene. Although opposition parties were nominally permitted after 1962 (the Colorado Party had been the only legal party in the country since 1947), Paraguay remained for all intents and purposes a one-party state. The electoral system was so heavily rigged in favor of the Colorados that the opposition had no realistic chance of winning, and opposition figures were subjected to varying degrees of harassment.

Stroessner's strong anti-communism made him a friend to United States interests for most of his rule. The government's human rights record was considered particularly poor. Stroessner supported the U.S. invasion of Dominican Republic.<2> and even offered to send troops to support the U.S. in Vietnam.<3>

His regime is also blamed for torture, kidnappings and corruption, of which the "terror archives", discovered in 1992 in Lambaré suburb of Asunción, gave proof; he did not dispute charges of corruption at some levels in his government.<4> He did become more tolerant of opposition as the years passed, but there was no change in the regime's basic character.

Strong Paraguayan-U.S. relations continued until the Carter Administration emphasized a foreign policy that recognized human rights abuses. The Reagan Administration boycotted the country as well.<5>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfredo_Stroessner

More, from a dated article, written in 1995:
ALFREDO STROESSNER
President of Paraguay
Alfredo Stroessner seized power in Paraguay in 1954. European correspondents who visited Paraguay during his rule used the term the "poor man's Nazi regime" to describe the Paraguayan government. Of German descent, Stroessner was a great admirer of Nazism, and this showed not only in the refuge he offered to many Nazi war criminals, such as Joseph Mengele, but also in his ruthless methods.
From the Nazis the Paraguayan military learned the art of genocide. The native Ache Indians were in the way of progress, progress represented by American and European corporations who planned to exploit the nation's forests, mines, and grazing lands. The Indians were hunted down, parents killed, and children sold into slavery. Survivors were herded into reservations headed by American fundamentalist missionaries, some of whom had participated in the hunts.
Between 1962 and 1975, Paraguay received $146 million in U.S. aid. Paraguayan officials seemingly wanted more, however, for in 1971, high ranking members of the regime were implicated in the Marseilles drug ring, with Paraguay their transfer point for shipments from France to the US. In the 1980s, America finally condemned Paraguayan civil rights abuses and drug trafficking. Stroessner still looked as if he'd be dictator for life, but in 1988 one of his closest generals, Andres Rodriguez, a known drug dealer, took over after a coup. Rodriguez promised to restore democracy, and President Bush called the 1989 elections a democratic opening, but opponents declared them a massive fraud. Rodriguez's Colorado party won 74% of the vote. Stroessner took refuge in Brasilia, Brazil. He still lives there, in comfort.
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/US_ThirdWorld/dictators.html

Or, how about those lovely Somozas, of Nicaragua?
ANASTASIO SOMOZA, SR. AND JR.
Presidents of Nicaragua
The Marines invaded Nicaragua in 1912, and stayed until 1933, fighting but never defeating the revolutionary Augusto Sandino. They created the Nicaraguan National Guard and installed Anastasio Somoza Garcia in power. Then Sandino, who had signed a truce and put down his arms, was assassinated by Somoza. A general who led the Marines into Nicaragua, explained, " I was a high class muscle-man for big business, for Wall Street and for the banks. In short, I was a racketeer for capitalism. l helped purify Nicaragua for an International banking house." President Franklin Roosevelt put it another way. "Somoza may be a son-of-a-bitch, but he's our son-of-a-bitch." Corruption, torture, and wholesale murder of dissidents continued for 45 years under two generations of Somozas, for after Somoza Garcia was gunned down in the streets in 1956, his son Anastasio Somoza Debayle took control. The Somozas plundered Nicaragua and became millionaires. The younger Somoza, made $12 million a year buying the blood of his people and selling it abroad at a 300% mark-up. In 1972 after an earthquake killed and wounded hundreds of thousands of Nicaraguans, Somoza had his National Guard seize $30 million in international relief supplies and sold them to the highest bidder. Near the end of his reign, he aerially bombed his own capital to stay in power, but he was overthrown in 1979 by a rebel group who called themselves the Sandinistas, after the revolutionary hero his father had slain.
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/US_ThirdWorld/dictators.html

There are so many little emperors, and military juntas the U.S. set in place and maintained, sometimes by bloody, vicious coups, after pouring astounding amounts of US taxpayers' dollars into destabilization of their countries in order to disenchant the people before finally knocking them off.

Loathesome way of conducting business with the other human beings in this hemisphere. It's nothing to be proud of, and the Americans who attempt to revile, vilify, smear democratically elected Latin American Presidents are absolute tools of zealots a brutal, heavy-handed, hate-driven system needing through deep level change in order to join the human race.

The Republican President stoutly supported the Venezuelan President Carlos Andres Perez, (who pressed crushing deprivation on the poor of Venezuela with a sudden package of brutal reforms right after his inauguration) the people who ran into the streets in outrage, finding they couldn't afford to pay for the transportation they needed to get to work, to buy groceries, to heat their homes, and then, when they were unarmed, and helpless in the streets demanded the police mow them down, and when the police refused, sent in his federal forces who opened fire, killing around 3,000 of them in the grotesque massacre named "El Caracazo," in 1989. He was later impeached for massive corruption, even imprisoned, but is still a major hero within the ruling oligarchy of Venezuela, living at his homes in New York, and Miami, and Colombia, and publicly calling out for Hugo Chavez to be shot down "like a dog." The murderer, arch criminal Carlos Andres Perez is still popular with the Venezuelan elite, and with certain parts of the U.S. political establishment.

They support the mass murderers, and try to use smear campaigns, and spin, and outright lies against the leftist Presidents, disseminated by the right-wing owned and operated corporate media, throughout Latin America, and here, as well. Sure hope to see their efforts finally become useless as the former victims build their own solidarity, no longer willing to be divided and conquered any longer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steepler0t Donating Member (348 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-08 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. I am not trying to bash him by saying that
But 10 going on 11 years with as much money as he is making from oil we really should see Caracas at least cleaned up some.
I applaud the literacy part, but the results he was showing have slowed in the past few years.
I think he is losing touch for a number of reasons, possibly bad advice from Castro?
Well, he did make a big effort, and I think he will be a positive influence and example for future leaders for what it is worth.
-Not a Chavez basher by any means, just speaking my mind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-08 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Why don't you post some links to information on his "slowing down?" We could use the education.
By the way, he was inaugurated February, 1999. That means ten years in February, 2009.

IF you're implying "slowing down" is reflected in the opposition getting 3 states out of 20 or 21, after everyone knows the opposition made a huge display of BOYCOTTING THE LAST ELECTION OF THIS KIND, knowing they were going to loose their asses anyway, you need to rethink what you're saying.

Don't fall for the obvious spin published in the right-wing owned corporate media. Your pResident Bush has been trying to destroy Hugo Chavez almost from the moment he stepped into Al Gore's office.

Please do your part in getting focused, informed on this important material, like the other DU'ers who make a point to post here.

The opposition BOYCOTTED the last election of this kind. It was everywhere. It was discussed here at length, again and again and again. The opposition did this because they knew they would be publicly trounced, and lose it all. After the election, as the time went by, they started claiming all legislation going on was unfair because the legislators were all Hugo Chavez's supporters. Why? Because they were the ones who WON the election.

You have to be almost brain dead to not figure this out for yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
10. The rightwing stupidly boycotted the last by-elections, so its "gains" in this one were
expectable. Looks like the millions of U.S. tax dollars poured into 'training' of the opposition, in Bushwhack USAID-NED programs, paid off for the Bushwhacks. Their side kept gubernatorial control of Zulia (the oil rich state on the Caribbean that has been the target of Bushwhack secessionist plotting) and won the mayoralty of Caracas. But I'd say that the "gains" were more a return to normality, after years of the rightwing insanity of perpetrating coups, strikes and recalls, and wrongfully challenging election results in one of the best election systems in the western hemisphere. They have made themselves look like fools. The rightwing has the advantages of millions of dollars in support from the Bushwhacks, and control of the largely corpo-fascist media. Sans a stupid boycott of the elections, they were bound to make "gains." Their USAID-NED "trainers" obviously saw this, and could even have designed things this way, and, if that is the case, then the few governorships and other offices they won (compared to the overwhelming overall Chavez victory--17 out of 20 states) cannot even be described as "gains." It is all just a Rovian 'news' manipulation--which, of course, assholes like Simon Romero at the NYT, play right into.

The country as a whole remains very much pro-Chavez. Chavez candidates won the great majority of offices. Chavez's personal approval rating remains in the 60% range.

-----

"Equivalent elections to those on 23 November took place in Venezuela in October 2004. Chávez's coalition of supporters won the elections in 80 per cent of the local authorities and 22 out of 24 governors.

"However, it should be noted that, during the run-up to the previous regional elections in October 2004, much of the opposition called on their supporters to abstain in an effort to discredit the Venezuelan electoral system, which they claimed was 'fraudulent' after their defeat in the August 2004 referendum on whether President Chávez would remain in office. These claims became increasingly unsustainable after electoral observation missions from the European Union, the OAS and the Carter Center repeatedly expressed satisfaction with the transparency, fairness, and inclusive nature of Venezuela's electoral system. As no such boycott will occur this time, it is reasonable to assume that this will strengthen the opposition's level of support, all other things being equal. It is hoped that accurate and honest media coverage will recognise this fact."
--Venezuelan Information Office

http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/analysis/3975

------

The voters and citizens of Venezuela, their election system and their political system as a whole, continue to amaze and impress me. Imagine what things would be like here in the U.S., if we didn't have 'TRADE SECRET' vote counting run by very political rightwing corporations, with no auditability whatever in half the voting systems in the country, and imagine if we had a government that protected our voting rights, that encouraged citizen participation, and that operated with the transparency of Venezuela's government.

We would never have suffered the Bush junta, or, at least, we would not have suffered it for so long (8 years! --that have seemed like 8 decades). Now, no matter what Obama tries to do, he is hamstrung by a $10 TRILLION deficit (and counting)--a deficit that didn't have to be--and by a collpsing financial system (that also didn't have to be), and so much other damage to our government and society. It might as well have been 8 decades, because it is likely going to take that much time to recover, if we ever do.

South America suffered this corpo/fascist destruction and meltdown before we did. They were the testing ground for what is being done to us now--the looting of social programs and resources, the weakening of government in every respect--with secrecy, corruption and other means--so that it will not respond to the majority and see to the interests of the country as a whole; the privatization of everything, the rich getting richer, the poor sinking. But, by concentrating on democratic institutions--transparent vote counting, maximum citizen participation, grass roots organizing--the South Americans are now recovering, having elected leftist governments all over the continent.

What I fear, there and here--but it is more of a danger here, because of the weakness of our democratic institutions--is that a little recovery, a little prosperity, will attract the vultures again, to plunder and loot once again. We are facing 2012 with a nearly completely non-transparent vote counting system. The corpo-fascists who control it (as well as virtually all news and opinion in the country) could easily install another nazi regime, and we would be helpless to prevent it, especially with our Democratic Party leaders colluding on the non-transparent voting system. Venezuela--and most of South America--does not have this problem. The votes are counted in the public venue, and Left and Right contend on a more even playing field. If the voters there forget WHY socialist measures and strong government action and regulation were needed, well, that will be the fallout from democracy (and from continued corpo/fascist control of the media, there too)--forgetful, brainwashable voters (like those who voted for Reagan--who started the dismantling of the "New Deal" and the looting of the country by global corporate predators).

Here, the reversal of any gains for the people, under Obama, is much, much more easily accomplished. One insider hacker, a few lines of self-erasing code, and millions of votes can be switched.

You gotta laugh--sometimes that's all you have, laughter--at the Bushwhacks and their corpo/fascist media calling Chavez a "dictator" (and our benighted Democrats, even Obama, echoing in). It is so ludicrous. The "dictatorship" is HERE. WE are the ones with NON-TRANSPARENT voting counting. WE are the ones whose government tortured prisoners and slaughtered a million innocent people for their oil. WE are the ones who couldn't stop global corporate predators from destroying our country and hijacking our military for a corporate resource war.

WE are the ones who have suffered a dictatorship--and it's not over yet, just because the global corporate predators who rule over us permitted a liberal-seeming leader to take the reins for a while. Whatever he does, they can and will loot; they still have that power. Venezuela, on the other hand, is no longer ruled by Exxon Mobil and Washington DC. That's why they call Chavez a 'dictator'--just as the corpo/fascists called FDR a 'dictator'--a total reversal of the truth. They don't want us to remember who rules in a democratic country--the people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. So glad you remind us all that the opposition opted OUT last time, so they WOULD gain now, natch!
As a reminder, an article from that time:
Opposition boycott as Venezuela heads for elections
Posted on: Wednesday, 30 November 2005, 22:43 CST

By Patrick Markey

CARACAS, Venezuela (Reuters) - Most of Venezuela's main opposition parties are boycotting legislative elections on Sunday that could allow President Hugo Chavez to consolidate his self-proclaimed socialist revolution.

Accusing election officials of favoring Chavez, opposition parties fell into disarray just days before the election after struggling to compete with the president who has spent billions in oil revenues on health and education for the poor.

"We believe that a true, autonomous and independent electoral judge would not subject the people to elections in these conditions," Justice First party spokesman Gerardo Blyde said announcing his party's withdrawal.

Chavez, an ally of Cuba who has become one of Washington's fiercest critics, blasted the opposition boycott as a U.S.-backed propaganda move meant to strip the vote of its legitimacy and stoke tensions against his government.

"Venezuelans, like all people, have a right to free and fair elections," said U.S. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack, rejecting the charges of U.S. meddling. "We are concerned that this right is increasingly in jeopardy."

Polls show Chavez is Venezuela's most popular leader and the opposition boycott could hand lawmakers supporting him the majority to pass reforms that critics fear will strengthen his hold on power before 2006 presidential elections.
More:
http://www.redorbit.com/news/international/317902/opposition_boycott_as_venezuela_heads_for_elections/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. thats some dictator ya got there, Venezuela.
"Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez went on television early Monday morning to accept the results of a regional vote where his party failed to secure key state and municipal governments."

I would call WINS in 17 of 20 states a fucking LANDSLIDE.

I pray that Obama and the Democratic Party change their openly hostile position against Venezuela.


VIVA Democracy!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Great spin, no?
lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. The CIA did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Feel free to add information DU'ers can use. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
16. What would we do without a report on this from The Heritage Foundation?
Why, we'd be lost, that's what! How would we ever find out the truth?
November 24, 2008
Fighting the Odds: Venezuela's Opposition Scores Key Victories
by Ray Walser
WebMemo #2142
On November 23, Venezuela's previously fragmented opposition scored key victories in state and municipal elections. President Hugo Chávez's march to create a socialized economy and install a one-party state à la Cuba continues to encounter resistance from wary voters. This electoral setback is the result of several everyday problems that have blemished Chávez's social track record and placed him on the defensive, including: high inflation, food scarcities, skyrocketing crime, and poor service delivery. Consequently, the electorate's reluctance to further embrace Chávez's socialist, one-party vision is drawing the opposition together.

By winning in key populous states like Zulia and Miranda and gaining the mayor's office in the capital district of Caracas, the opposition showed it is able to build electoral strength and that its message is penetrating deeper into urban areas--Chávez's traditional stronghold. The opposition also claimed victories in the states of Carabobo and Táchira. Overall, Venezuela's democratic opposition will take heart that its efforts to resist the unchallenged imposition of Chávez's socialist dream finds resonance with voters and that political pluralism survives in Venezuela.

At stake during the November 23 elections were a total of 22 governorships, 328 mayoral positions, and hundreds of local legislative council seats. The elections pitted Chávez's new United Venezuelan Socialist Party (PSUV) against a handful of leftist dissidents and remnants of the more centrist and conservative opposition of Venezuela's late-1990s two-party system.

Even pro-Chávez analysts credit opposition candidates with running effective campaigns. These campaigns were tightly focused on local, everyday issues--issues on which Chávez was vulnerable--such as the government's inability to deliver on commitments and address such problems as garbage collection and its failure to respond to increases in homicides, kidnappings, and other violent crimes.
More:
http://www.heritage.org/Research/LatinAmerica/wm2142.cfm

http://www.kaiseredu.org.nyud.net:8090/uploadedImages/Policy_Fellowships/Page_2/heritage%20foundation.GIF

http://blog.heritage.org.nyud.net:8090/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/jesse_helms.jpg

Ed Feulner, president of The Heritage Foundation
on the right, with Jesse Helms, on the other right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
agent007 Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-08 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
17. He will win the presidency again
Clinton won in '96 despite seeing the party lose congress 2 years earlier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-08 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
22. "Chavez allies renew mandate in landslide."
Revised headline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Absolutely, and perfectly accurate. Good one! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I was waiting for someone to pick it apart, and you come along ...
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. LOL! Damn dictator lovers!
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC