Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Calif.) high court opens door for prosecuting some medical pot suppliers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 06:42 PM
Original message
(Calif.) high court opens door for prosecuting some medical pot suppliers
Source: San Francisco Chronicle

Someone who supplies marijuana to a patient who has a doctor's approval for it can be prosecuted for drug-dealing, the state Supreme Court ruled today in a narrow interpretation of California's medical marijuana law.

Advocates on both sides of the case agreed that the unanimous ruling would encourage Californians to obtain medical marijuana from patient cooperatives, which are authorized by a 2003 state law, rather than from an individual supplier.

... But Lawrence Gibbs, attorney for the Santa Cruz County man who appealed his marijuana-dealing convictions, said the court "made it much, much more difficult for qualified patients to get their medical marijuana."

Although patients can turn to cooperatives or clubs, Gibbs said, the resulting centralization of cultivation and supply will make raids and prosecutions much easier for federal authorities, who are not bound by Prop. 215. President-elect Barack Obama said during the campaign that he supports a state's right to legalize the medical use of marijuana, but believes it should be subject to regulation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/11/24/BAD314B41O.DTL&tsp=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. "High" court?? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Obviously. Doh.
Although Chong would make for a better justice than Scalia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why would this be of interest to anyone?
Seriously, all this to accomplish what? What the hell are these people trying to prove? Aren't there enough real criminals out and about to hound? Yes, let's give sick people one more thing to be uncertain, or flat out terrified of. Great job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piewhacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Prison industry requires constant supply of red meat.
But don't take my word on it. Ask Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ksimons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. funny they don't want to go after billions/trillions lifted from consumer wallets by Wall Street
but they are more than happy to go after a few people who are following the laws of their State.

January 20th can't come soon enough. Desperate Repubbies trying to make themselves relevent. Sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. discrimination continues - pro-life except when it is convenient for them
to let people die, or bomb them, or deny them health care, etc. until they all die unless they are wing nuts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC