Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry faces big test in internet storm about mystery woman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
rodbarnett Donating Member (577 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:32 PM
Original message
Kerry faces big test in internet storm about mystery woman
The campaign of Senator John Kerry, the frontrunner for the Democratic nomination, faced its first media storm last night after a Right-wing website alleged that he had asked a woman to leave the country for personal reasons.

Mr Kerry's campaign did not respond to the allegation on the Drudge Report, a news tipster, most famous for disclosing that Bill Clinton had an affair with Monica Lewinsky, a White House intern. When contacted, the Kerry campaign had no immediate comment

But Democratic sources blamed the allegation on Republican "dirty tricks". They said it marked the long-expected start of a campaign from the Right to smear the frontrunner and damage his chances of fighting a strong campaign against President George W Bush.

<snip>

Diehard Dean supporters exulted on internet forums at the news that the man who usurped their hero's position as favourite was at the centre of his own media storm.

Deaniacs remain bitter at what they perceive as the media's destruction of their candidate, who only a month ago led the polls. Last night Mr Kerry's campaign internet forum for activists was seething with accusations of Republican dirty tricks

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/02/13/wus13.xml&sSheet=/portal/2004/02/13/ixportaltop.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, crap.
Diehard Dean supporters exulted on internet forums at the news that the man who usurped their hero's position as favourite was at the centre of his own media storm.

Yes, they mean us. And when I say "us", I don't mean "all of us", but there it is. Goodbye AWOL story. :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike1963 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Nonsense. It's a non-story.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInTheMaise Donating Member (250 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Today it's a non-story
After today the legs grow and the next stop is TBD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
private_ryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. how do you know?
wishful thinking or you know something we don't? Kerry is a man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. What exactly does that mean?
"Kerry is a man."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Womblestuffer Donating Member (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. This is the best way to divide us INFIGHTING, Stop it, Dean needs
to accept Kerry's opology, and Kerry needs to dump Torrecelli
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. How about full disclosure about the Osama ad?
Such Rovian tactics have no place in the Democratic Party, and the ad did cross the line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 03:18 AM
Response to Reply #17
32. Blood for blood, death for death!
Edited on Fri Feb-13-04 03:20 AM by JVS
Yeeeeeaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrggggggggghhhhhhhhhh!

Unless of course, Dean is offered some kind of hefty reparation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
private_ryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. and men are known to have faults
Does Martin Luther King ring a bell to you? Bill Clinton?

Oh, I see. it's a stereotype.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. Men and women have faults
Perhaps the word should have been HUman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
private_ryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:44 AM
Original message
I was talking about Kerry
who is a man.Also men seem to have a harder time keeping it in their pants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RowWellandLive Donating Member (531 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
31. Are we supposed to accept that
men have a harder time keeping it in their pants? If a woman is sexually attracted to a man outside her marriage is she expected to control herself while a man in the same situation can stray? Are men's desires more powerful and uncontrollable then women's? Just asking.

I resent living in a society where it is somehow acceptable for men to cheat on their wives with younger (or any age) women, while the wives are expected to control their own desires and forgive their husbands betrayals. This is an obscene double standard that I do not want to have to hear in a progressive forum.

Personally, I am sick of all these women forgiving and taking back their men. I cannot think of any high profile man who forgave his wife for cheating on him with a young stud. Yeah, good luck with that.

We need to teach our daughters that men are not animals controlled by sexual impulses. They should demand and expect fidelity. As long as poor behavior is tolerated it will continue. Personally, I expect no less from my husband then the fidelity I give him. No woman should!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
private_ryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 04:26 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. whether you accept it, resent it or not really doesn't matter
it's a fact! Men cheat more than women. Nature or nurture we can debate this another time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #33
44. When a man contemplates running for the presidency...knowing what
happened to Clinton..he should be aware that A: he can be setup...B: this will become public knowledge C: imagine how his family would feel if this story turns out to be true....OR NOT!

I hope to hell this is not true...and I am a Dean suppporter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #33
45. How can that be possible?
Are they all cheating with the same woman? If you have sex with a married man, you are part of the cheating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
private_ryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #45
48. part of cheating
well, if you're a single 20 year old girl and you're having sex with a married 50 year old man, you really aren't cheating on anyone. He is. Immoral and wrong but not cheating....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-04 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #31
55. Silly.
Why the so petulant? Let's save the outrage for the women and men who are ripping us off and forget the human sexual foibles. And yes -many men (and women) do seem to have a problems living in a world that superficially values sexual fidelity and monogamy. And power is a great aphrodisiac and attractiveness is a great ego booster for the ego driven (i.e. politicians).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DirtyUnderwear Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
37. easy for women
....since they have nothing in their pants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
42. If you talking about a man "keeping it in his pants"
Then you have to recall that he is putting it somewhere.

Again, HUmans, not just men. Your comment is decidedly anti-male.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
private_ryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #42
47. do you deny that men generally cheat more?
yes or no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DirtyUnderwear Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
36. Dream on fella
I'm worried, that this will destroy Kerry. He's our only hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Self-locking...
meaning I ain't posting on any article about this again until it's a credible allegation and not a regurgitation of a Drudge story.

I would suggest this as a good strategy for everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kstewart33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Good point
Why is it that at least some of the news orgs that Drudge cites as conducting major investigations, are denying that they are?

I'll be listening to Kerry tomorrow on Imus. But until then, this story is not worth commenting on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. We're Doomed!
:wtf:

What "Media Storm"???????

and by the way, who gives a rat's ass..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. and then it moved to the Britsh press...
tomorrow morning its talk radio. Fox News by tomorrow afternoon or evening. The other cable networks by the weekend. At this pace it should be in the major newspapers by Monday morning. Tom, Dan and Peter will have it by monday night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. God, I hope not
Edited on Thu Feb-12-04 09:56 PM by lancdem
:(
But I imagine if this continues, the mainstream media will be pressured to cover it even if they can't independently confirm it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mobuto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Its moved to the British Press
because they'll regurgitate Drudge, no questions asked, something that the more reputable US media won't do.

Even if true - and I've heard details which were sharply different from Drudge's - it isn't terribly significant. So a politician has had an affair. You don't exactly have to stop the presses on that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Sorry, but the US media has not credibility whatsoever
The British press debunked all the stories about WMDs in Iraq, while the US press was cheerleading for the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mobuto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #21
49. This is the kind of tabloid personal smear
that's near and dear to the hearts of British "journalists."

Read their papers more often - its amazing they print what they print, given the power of British libel law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well, it worked for Clinton.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsw_81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
10. The "diehard Dean supporters" better not get their hopes up
The mainstream press isn't going to touch this Drudge sludge unless there's clear and convincing evidence that Senator Kerry did something wrong. And even if he did, the American people have already made it clear that a politician's private life is nobody's business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. We both know that's not true
Women's groups gave Clinton a pass they should never have given him -- all because of his politics, not his actions. Bosses should NEVER sleep with employees. It creates a climate of sexual harassment for all other workers who then are given the impression that is the way to get to the boss.

We'd be all over a corporate scumbag who slept with his employees and took advantage of his position. We'd be all over some winger asshole who did it. It's about time we became consistent on something.

I don't know what Kerry did or if he did anything. But if he abused his office, that is a huge issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsw_81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Don't you remember 1998?
The American people made it clear in poll after poll after poll that they didn't want to hear about the Lewinsky "scandal," and on election day Democrats actually gained seats in the Congress and brought Newt Gingrich's career to a screeching halt.

And Clinton's relationship with Lewinsky was NOT "sexual harassment" in any way, shape, or form; it was a consensual relationship between two consenting adults. That's why he got a "pass" from women's groups; it had nothing to do with politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Clinton was already in office
Kerry is not in the job he aspires to.

As for Lewinski, it was indeed sexual harassment -- not of her, but of others in that office. When the boss sleeps with an employee, it gives the impression that is what is required to other workers. It's a horrendous abuse of power.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RowWellandLive Donating Member (531 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Yes Muddle
you are completely correct. That was the kind of thing that women's groups fought against for so long and then gave Bill a pass on because of his politics. The whole situation stunk. In their collective zeals the right wing went overboard with impeachment and the left abandoned their principles to defend what they previously considered to be indefensible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #26
34. Yes, agree with you both
With one quibble: I would not call the apologists for Clinton's behavior the "left." The left properly despised Clinton's conservativism and was in no mood to give him a pass on anything; he got a free ride from ex-liberals who'd driven their SUVs to the stock market free-for-all of the center.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff in Cincinnati Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #26
41. Utter and complete horsesh*t
Edited on Fri Feb-13-04 08:16 AM by ritc2750
I'll say it again: utter and complete horseshit.

Having a consensual affair with an employee is not sexual harrassment, not in the legal sense and certainly not in the sense of what-in-the-hell-are-you-thinking?! Consenting adults have the right to have sex with whomever they please, and the morality police can please take a flying fuck at a rolling doughnut.

If Clinton had been making sexual advances at every woman in the workplace, then that theory would have some degree of credibility. But the fact is that he wasn't -- as witnessed by the fact that the judge in the case determined that even if Clinton had situplated to having an affair with Lewinski, it would not have been relevant to the Paula Jones case.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. Again, you are wrong
Try dealing with HR issues sometime. A boss sleeping with an employee is a minefield of troubles. Sure, it CAN be OK for them both, but is NOT OK for everyone else. Monica, as you recall, had preferred access to the most important person in the world. All because she was his sex toy. Meanwhile, other more experienced (professionally experienced that is) people did NOT have the same access. All because they would not diddle the boss.

If Bill of Kerry want to sleep around, so be it. However, if they harass their staffs, that is a different matter.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff in Cincinnati Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #43
53. I do deal the HR issues
You might want to try reading case law sometime. While anybody can file a lawsuit against anybody (the Janet Jackson lawsuit is a fine example), there's an enormous difference between a making claim and a winning judgement. You can't make a successful case for a "hostile work environment" just because you don't like the boss's choice of girlfriends.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
private_ryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #41
51. it's a nightmare in today's corporate world
I wouldn't be surprised. Even complimenting on a sweater or haircut can be considered sexual harrasment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matilda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #22
39. Remember, though, that before Monica there was Gennifer Flowers.
Clinton nearly lost his bid then, but Hillary saved him. So it
could happen again.

Besides, Bush is now facing the AWOL issue, and this time it looks
as if it mightn't go away. Perhaps Kerry's advance might be slowed
a little, and perhaps the nomination might be more open than it
was earlier in the week, but I don't think everything's going Bush's
way, not by a long shot - and speaking from a fairly objective
distance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalron Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. The mainstream press has an out,
they can report on the report. Then they can say that they are not reporting about the event; but reporting that there is a report about the event; so, no ethical violations.
And, the American people have shown no such thing. Besides, they can be made to think that it is their business.
This is liberalron, and I have approved this message. It is in not intended to be an endorsement or disendorsement of any candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #24
46. you're right
My local news this morning "reported" it by saying that the allegation appeared yesterday in the Druge Report, but they didn't run it because it's a 'conservative' website. Then he quoted an Australian site reporting that Kerry would answer the allegation today.

So, Drudge gets reported one way or another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. Drudge always calls things with Democrats storms
or firestorms to make it sound as bad as possible.

If they want to do this, then I'd like to know about Margie Schoedinger, the lady that committed assisted "suicide" after she filed a suit against Bush for Rape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
16. Tabloid Journalism
that'll save the world

...not...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-04 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
54. It's all Jimmy Carter's fault : )
Edited on Sat Feb-14-04 03:16 PM by cosmicdot
for lusting in his heart ... to put a cool side to his religious side ... that was 1976 ...

now, in 2004 ... lust? what lust?

Jimmy tried to spice it up then; now, anything in a blue dress spells t-r-o-u-b-l-e ... right here in River City ...

Headline: Candidate entered pool hall while teen. Details at 11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
23. So What? Don't give it the least bit of attention. If Mrs Kerry thinks
it's a problem, she will divorce him. Nothing to do with us and of no significance whatsoever. Ignore it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RowWellandLive Donating Member (531 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. If Teresa leaves him
that will be a huge problem. Like it or not, a stable marriage and a supportive wife are important in a Presidential campaign. Hillary's standing by her man got Bill through. If Teresa leaves her husband it would be a big scandal and overshadow all the issues. That's just reality.

Drudge or not, my gut tells me that this is true. Kerry's "women troubles" have been floating around underneath the surface for a while. How he handles this, and more importantly, how his wife does are more crucial then we'd prefer to believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
27. Drudge is already backpedaling on this
"hard to prove"

The heat has just been too fucking hot on chimp lately. Time to defuse the situation!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
29. The telegraph is not a reliable source
The telegraph has printed Chris Ruddy's crap in the past, including the totally bogus Ron Brown "murder". In this case they are citing Drudge as the source, so it is still a Drudge "story" and should not qualify as breaking news, as Drudge is not a news source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
30. ## Support Democratic Underground! ##
RUN C:\GROVELBOT.EXE

This week is our first quarter 2004 fund drive.
Please take a moment to donate to DU. Thank you
for your support.

- An automated message from the DU GrovelBot


Click here to donate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ammagrappet Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
35. MSNBC e-mail leak Source of Drudge Report Story
Read Joe Conason in Salon this morning. He confirms that someone at MSNBC leaked an e-mail from an editor speculating about the rumor. Interesting trail.

http://www.salon.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shadder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #35
40. You can do better than that
First of all, it's an opinion piece. Second of all, you need to look at the enitre section:

"Within 10 minutes after Drudge posted the Kerry intern item, Crawford sent a memo to his superiors that said the story was "something Chris Lehane (clark press secy) has shopped around for a long time." According to Crawford, someone at MSNBC promptly leaked his memo to Drudge. But when Lehane called Crawford with a loudly indignant denial, the MSNBC columnist quickly issued a public retraction. He said:

"The comments attributed to me are from a private email to television news associates based on conversations with Democratic campaign operatives. I did not consider any of it confirmed enough to report or publish. I can only verify that Chris Lehane's rivals in other Democratic campaigns made these claims and I have found no independent source to confirm it. Which is why we did not go with the story. But then someone sent my email to others, which is the only reason it got into the public domain." In other words, there is no proof that Lehane circulated the rumor, let alone that the rumor has any basis in reality."

Look at the main point here- I did not consider any of it confirmed enough to report or publish. I can only verify that Chris Lehane's rivals in other Democratic campaigns made these claims and I have found no independent source to confirm it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
38. It will be interesting
how much media play and the amount of "outrage" they inject into their coverage. Afterall when its a rethug (ahnold, st. rudy) this really is NOT a big deal, whats changed. True or not, Kerry needs to confront this. Ignoring things don't make them go away, I think chimp is FINALLY realizing this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shimmergal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
50. Bush toadies are going to try this on any Democratic candidate,
regardless of its truth or falsehood. Hopefully rivals within the party wouldn't try to, although apparently that's too idealistic...

From this standpoint, perhaps Dennis Kucinich would be the best candidate? Since he's single, only the wingnut Puritans would get stirred up over hints of an affair.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #50
52. Sounds like they shot their wad early.....
All this delving into Shrub's murky past made them bring up their big guns.

Is this the best they can do?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-04 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #52
57. They don't have to "do" anything, unfortunately
All they have to do is put out unsubstantiatied rumor after unsubstantiated rumor. We saw this for nine years under Clinton, it should come as no surprise.

Basically, all the Republicans have against Democrats is this made-up image/reputation of Democrats sticking their equipment where it doesn't belong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-04 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
56. Fox newsturd just said
...that the woman had sent a letter to the Kerry campaign denying there was ever an affair.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
young_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-04 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
58. There was talk once about Bush having an affair
Why isn't that being mentioned?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-04 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #58
62. Good point
whatever happened to Tammy Phillips?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-04 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
59. How can it be that we don't have an answer to Drudge?
Drudge can put any lies or garbage on his ugly website and the right wing press and radio run with it. Why isn't there a liberal equivalent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ted37_99 Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-04 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. reason for no liberal equivalent......
the simple answer to that question? liberals need not lie and anyone with more than two brain cells can sniff out drudges and rush's or o'rielly's lies very quickly. the public is smarter than you think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbyboucher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-04 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. Exactamundo, and we have Buzzflash, but they don't lie,
they just link to articles using sarcastic and cynical headers. They also have well researched articles. Good site.

http://www.buzzflash.com/

Late.

Oh yeah, sorry to keep this despicable thread going. It should die a horrible and swift death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC