Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Taleban's ex-spokesman shot dead

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 11:11 PM
Original message
Taleban's ex-spokesman shot dead
Source: BBC News

A former high-profile spokesman for the Taleban has been shot dead in eastern Afghanistan, officials have said.

Mohammad Hanif was killed at his home in the province of Nangarhar along with three other people who were believed to be his relatives.

Some reports said the assailants were wearing Afghan army uniforms.

Dr Hanif, as he was known, was arrested in January 2007, but freed from custody this year. It was thought he no longer had any contact with the Taleban.


Read more: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/7755106.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. it'll be interesting to see if this story develops. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. according to another report I read, this was a well-executed operation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. well -- that' s very interesting --
why was this a 'well executed' operation?

what's the 'need' there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. My guess
The guy knew something about the opium traffickers and who in the government may have had ties to it. Maybe some information on Kharzai's brother, for example. But who really knows, the truth behind the matter won't get out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. oh i think it's both as simple -- and complex -- as that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Some of that "new freedom and democracy at work", eh?
Nice they freed him so they could waltz in and butcher him and his relatives for the holidays.

Yeah.....we have really turned Afghanistan around. Now let me get this straight. These were OUR GUYS that butchered him?....or ...???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Karzai doesn't really have control over his country
Between opium dealers and rogue generals that have allegiances to money alone, its a slippery slope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. The "Clown" the Mayor of Kabul-- nothing more
And his lips are on the US Taxpayers tit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KakistocracyHater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. lie detector test
hook up a suspect, ask control questions:'do you believe in god(allah), followed by an obvious controlled NO answer'the easter bunny is real'. No words need be spoken by the suspect, body responses alone should give the truth, no torture necessary. Thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 02:42 AM
Response to Original message
9. I'm not going to cry over one less member of the Taliban running around
don't care if he was still with them or not

he has blood on his hands


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Really? No problem with government death squads...
...engaging in summary executions?

And should anyone who has ever participated in an insurgency be summarily executed at will, too?

Strange morality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. he wasn't just anyone who participated
he was one of the leaders of a terrorist movement

the Taliban killed thousands, if not millions, of people, including their own citizens

his government had its own death squads

like I said he had blood on his hands


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
3.141592653 Donating Member (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Your response is interesting to me.
So without any evidence whatsoever you think it's okay to execute a human being?

If I'm reading your correctly all the hostages at the Guantanamo Gulag should be executed and fed to the sharks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. no evidence?
honey, it was well documented that he was the spokesman for the Taliban

"A former high-profile spokesman for the Taleban has been shot dead in eastern Afghanistan, officials have said."

reading comprehension is your friend

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
3.141592653 Donating Member (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. oop, my mistake
So if you read something in the media, therefore, it must be true.

"Officials"?

Could you define some "officials" for me? Maybe then I can move up to the level of comprehension you are at.

Honey, let me explain something to you. Unless you have been in Afghanistan, like I have, you don't know 'nuthin. That place is one eff'ed up beyond all comprehension piece of shit craphole. Virtually nothing you read is the truth when it comes to that place.

Yeah, he's probably guilty, but he didn't have a trial, there was no evidence and you are being manipulated by the lazy media. He was tried and executed by a roadside jury. Imagine that if you can. Put yourself in that situation. What if he was innocent?

I urge you to learn, study and try to comprehend before you comment. The world is lot more complex than what you see past the lawn ornaments next to your double wide trailer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. LOL welcome to DU
Nice comeback
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. lol

3.14

just a passing pie thrower





blind leading the blind 'honey'

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. yep. and to think that (those) poor woman (women)...
could have been 'innocent' ('innocents') too...

but it's ok for some.

not moi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. And what about the blood on the hands of your political leaders?
Are they fair game for summary execution, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. my political leaders?
interesting phrasing there

when my political leaders belong to a regime that summarily executed thousands, if not millions, of its own citizens, then we'll talk

let's not forget as well that the Taliban has been responsible since it left power for killing thousands of others, including American men and women

and let's not forget that the Taliban was responsible for protecting and harboring bin Laden

I don't care if this guy is dead

if you want to be an apologist for these evil people, go for it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngant17 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. when the Soviets were fighting the Taliban
guess who was supporting these killers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. who might that be?
I don't know?

wow-you're just too smart for me

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamuti Lotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. Mutilated history..
Edited on Sun Nov-30-08 09:01 PM by Alamuti Lotus
Soviets did not fight the "Taliban", the resistance at the time was composed of a wide variety of factions and warlords. After the withdrawal of Russian forces and the collapse of the communist-leaning gov't, the warlords (a variety of factions backed by United States, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Pakistan, and others) turned on each other. To sweep aside the chaos they had created in the vaccuum, the (initially, fiercely independent) "Taliban" movement swept aside all of these foreign-backed warlord factions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #28
36. don't throw facts into the mix
It doesn't make for revisionist story time ;)


Yes, Soviets attacked all Afghan tribes after their puppet requested help.

And the Taliban turned on their "brothers in arms" after the Soviets pulled out, with a little foreign outside help of their own.

bottom line;

It was a shit hole under the taliban opium oppressive thumb. ( oh, but the cut the production of poppy in unauthorized areas of the country...so, to some, "taliban good" )


Why would anybody return now after leaving that shit hole running from the Soviets ? cuz she was clueless six month old with visions of proud,dignified people I suppose.

Why would they return now after the Taliban fundies no longer rule like they did in the 90's ? cuz she feels safe roaming around in western controlled zones I suppose again.

She isn't safe to return at all but she did put together a decent video.

Afghanistan - "Yalda's Kabul" (Nov.2008)

"I'm returning to Kabul, my first visit since my family fled the Russian invasion 25 years ago. They escaped on horseback carrying me with them I was just six months old. Because of my personal ties to this country I have always romanticized Afghanistan, a nation of proud people, dignified, ready to defend their land against foreign invaders. But 30 years of war has left the country broken

snip

video
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ad8_1228174148


Why do the taliban continue to burn girls schools and throw acid in their pupils ?

bc when we leave,

it will still be a drug cultivating shit hole run by the fundies.....

most likely.

And one drug clinic built last year will end up like the old Russian cultural center when the Soviets left and alla help those who worked with the americans the way the South Vietnamese did
The addicts don't drink alcohol bc the price of opium is so cheap. It grows like weeds everywhere.
Life is cheap and will remain that way when we leave. No change for them

end screed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamuti Lotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Should heed your own advice
Rahmani, about 50, is a member of the Taliban's shura (council) and a close adviser to Taliban leader Mullah Omar, with whom he is in daily contact; so much so that in Taliban circles he is considered Mullah Omar's shadow. During Taliban rule (1996-2001), Rahmani was governor of Kandahar province, the Taliban's spiritual heartland.
-----
Asia Times Online: Please introduce yourself. How were you introduced to the Taliban movement? How did you became governor of Kandahar province? What is your relation with the Taliban movement at present?

Mullah Mohammad Hasan Rahmani: My name is Hasan Rahmani. I am a former governor of Kandahar province. I was involved with the Taliban movement from its beginning. It was an Islamic movement, and I had been involved in jihad, so I joined it. Later, when some areas were conquered by the Taliban, I was appointed as governor of Kandahar, and till the last I remained in this position.

-----
ATol: The Taliban are blamed for attacking unveiled women with acid in Kandahar. What is the reality?

HR: This is propaganda aimed at defaming the Taliban. Nobody knows who threw the acid. Throwing acid on any human being, whether a man or a woman, has never been the Taliban’s policy and the Taliban deny their involvement in such acts.
-----
interview link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Interesting thought pattern
"when my political leaders belong to a regime that summarily executed thousands, if not millions, of its own citizens, then we'll talk"

But when your political leaders summarily execute hundreds of thousands, and their mere presence in a region promotes the death of over a million people, its ok because its another country's citizens?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. He was a mouthpiece, like Dana Perino. n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. I expect better from you
there is no comparison between the Bushies and the Taliban

when the Bushies start executing thousands of Americans in football stadiums, then you can make that comparison


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I was comparing one mouthpiece to the other.
And the best that can be said for Bush is that he murdered people in secret black ops sites and by proxy in countries like Egypt and not in stadiums in public.

Do you remember this guy? He tried to get out before the invasion. He was nothing. Not like Omar who Bush has let sit in Karachi all these years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I don't remember him
who is he?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. I remember him because he always looked like a deer in headlights.
He was the guy that spoke for the Taliban during those awful days when Bush was supposedly "negotiating" with them for bin Laden. So, clips of him talking got into our news broadcasts.

One side or the other was always going to kill him -- and, he knew it all that long time ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamuti Lotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
30. millions?!
hyperbole much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. "Some reports said the assailants were wearing Afghan army uniforms. "
Article didn't say it was afghan army that took out the big dog
snip
Some reports said the assailants were wearing Afghan army uniforms.
snip
Taliban have and use Afghan army uniforms when they conduct operations also,
so,

"inside job" can't be discounted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
34. How about all those Taliban ordered executions?
How about the enslavement and slaughter of women during the Taliban Government? How about the reduction of women to lower then farm animals? Bought and sold, raped, assaulted, beaten. Resorting to self-immolation to escape life.

Forbidden to speak, laugh, be seen, have their footsteps heard. Fingers removed if caught with nail polish.

Denied medical treatment for the most simple things.

Denied education or employment.

Not even allowed to step foot outside without a husband, brother or father. If they do not have a husband, brother or father then they can stay inside and pray neighbors keep them from starving.

So I have a little bit of a tough time swallowing your outrage at government death squads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. Gee sorry to hear about that
not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. Good riddance.
I wish all the taliban would die.

Stupid hateful people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
32. Good- The more they eliminate the better
They have no redeeming qualities. None. The world is a better place without them.

They are worse then the Nazi's in ideology and thankfully less in numbers.

Anyone who thinks I am heartless because of my feelings towards the Taliban is ignorant of who and what they are, in my opinion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Except this wasn't an "elimination", it was a murder and in theory
we're in Afghanistan to restore the rule of law, not to cheer murders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. It's not Minneapolis
and his organization harbored no such beliefs that would prevent them from doing the same...quite the contrary. What was done to him would have brought him pious respect and upgraded social status had he done it to someone else. He would gladly have slit your throat, for example, were you in the way of his religious and political beliefs.

The rule of law can only be approached by successive approximations, by a slowly-growing trust by citizens that order is displacing rule by raw power. Rule by law can never be implemented until strongmen who use death, fear, and zealotry to maintain their hold are gotten rid of.

He's been gotten rid of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. You've just paraphrased Sharia. I assume you know that. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #40
43. Not only is your reply not right, it isn't even wrong.
It's a diversion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbane Donating Member (668 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
41. B-O-O H-O-O
Lay down with dogs and you get fleas, or in this case, dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
42. Good. Hope it hurt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC