Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Administration Split Over Role Of U.N. in Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 11:24 PM
Original message
Administration Split Over Role Of U.N. in Iraq
Administration Split Over Role Of U.N. in Iraq
Group's Aid Key, Many Officials Say

By Robin Wright

Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, February 18, 2004; Page A12


The Bush administration is divided over how much authority to give the United Nations in Iraq, despite Washington's reliance on the world body to help rescue the political transition so the U.S.-led occupation can end June 30, U.S. and congressional officials say.

Over the past two months, a growing number of senior U.S. foreign policy officials and military officers have become convinced that the transition will succeed -- and have the widest support among Iraqis -- only if the United Nations crafts a plan and then oversees selection of a provisional Iraqi government, with help from the United States and other coalition partners.

But key U.S. officials in the offices of Vice President Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld oppose handing over significant authority or control of the pivotal process, preferring to keep the United Nations in an advisory or support role, according to U.S. and congressional officials.

"They say, 'Can the U.N. really do it better than we can?' These are not guys who think the U.N. is capable of assuming a massive undertaking like Iraq. They argue that we've invested billions of dollars, hundreds of lives, and the reputations of a nation and a president. We can't fail. But if we turn it over to others, we lose control of Iraq's destiny," a well-placed U.S. official said.

more.............

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A49335-2004Feb17.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. We'll "lose control of Iraq's destiny."
That says it all. We want to control Iraq's destiny and nothing - not US deaths, civilian deaths, international scorn, nor the loss of treasure - will stand in the little Emperor's way. This is embarrassment on an historic scale. Stupid is too elevated aterm for this crap!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sushi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Didn't * invade Iraq to LIBERATE
Edited on Tue Feb-17-04 11:44 PM by sushi
the Iraqis? Iraq's destiny should not be in the hands of foreigners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. A big change would be seen immediately in Iraq, if the US pulled out
and took Halliburton and their beloved Ahmed Chalabi and the crime cabal with 'em. I believe the UN could bring peace and stability to Iraq.

It frost my balls to hear talk like how much power should the US give the UN!!! Give me a fucking break. The US should tell the UN we'll help you anyway we can, what do you want us to do?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC