Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton Lawyer On Bush's Exec Privilege Claim: "There's Only One President At A Time"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 05:14 PM
Original message
Clinton Lawyer On Bush's Exec Privilege Claim: "There's Only One President At A Time"
Source: Talking Points Memo

Clinton Lawyer On Bush's Exec Privilege Claim: "There's Only One President At A Time"
By Zachary Roth - January 30, 2009, 3:16PM

So does that letter Newsweek obtained, sent January 16 by the Bush White House to Karl Rove's lawyer, instructing Rove not to respond to any subpoenas that might be issued, change the state of play as to whether Rove will end up testifying on the US Attorneys firings? After all, President Bush is now on the record claiming the right to assert executive privilege even after leaving office.

Not according to Neil Eggleston, who specialized in executive privilege issues for President Clinton's White House. Eggleston told TPMmuckraker that, since President Obama has already issued an executive order that appears to take the view that a former president can't assert executive privilege, he's unlikely to back Bush's claim. And assuming things then wind up in court, Eggleston said he'd be very surprised if a court sided with Bush, ruling that executive privilege can be asserted retroactively.

"Remember what Obama kept saying during the transition: 'There's only one president at a time?'" asked Eggleston. "This is one where I think a court's going to decide there's only one president at a time."

Eggleston told TPMmuckraker last week that Obama's order seemed designed to help gain access to Bush White House documents and testimony that Congress has been seeking, including on the US Attorney firings matter.


Read more: http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/01/report_schlozman_broke_the_law_then_tried_to_hide.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
navarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. from his lips to Barack's ears
I hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejbr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Keeping our fingers crossed n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piewhacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Obama soars far above it all, as Rove's throat slices open all by itself.
Damn. don't be messin with that 'bama guy.

I don't think we are done yet.
So I'm renewing my popcorn subscription.

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. LOL. Right on Barack. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. How's THAT for staying on message?
Where have I heard that line before?:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. The presidency is an institution, not a man.
Bush is a private citizen.

He may retain some rights over his documents, but even that could be refined by executive order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. But can they find an honest judge? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. Allowing past president to claim executive privilege could interfere with the current presidents -
Edited on Fri Jan-30-09 07:25 PM by Wizard777
ability to execute the office. Once Bush leaves office. His decision making process becomes a moot point. This is further backed up by the fact he may NEVER become President again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
live love laugh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Excellent point. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC