NYT analysis: U.S. Presidential Politics and Self-Rule for Iraqis

[DeepModem Mom]

NEWS ANALYSIS: THE TRANSFER
U.S. Presidential Politics and Self-Rule for Iraqis
By STEVEN R. WEISMAN

Published: February 19, 2004


WASHINGTON, Feb. 18 — In the Bush administration, it is considered heresy to suggest postponing the planned return of sovereignty to Iraq. Turning over control by June 30, administration officials say, is crucial to assuaging Iraqi distress over living under American occupation.

Yet in recent weeks, diplomats and even some in the administration have begun to worry that the date reflects more concern for American politics than Iraqi democracy. Their fear is that an untested government taking power on June 30 may not be strong enough to withstand the pressures bearing down on it.

"When we went into Iraq, our plan was to have a government, build a structure and write a constitution that would be a source of longterm stability," said an administration official. "Now that's out the window."

Many in the administration say that while they have no proof that the urgency to install a government is politically motivated, it feels to them like part of a White House plan to permit President Bush to run for re-election while taking credit for establishing self-rule in Iraq.


http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/19/politics/19DIPL.html

[Barrett808]

1. No plan, making it up as they go.

Pathetic.

[Beetwasher]

2. They Certainly Do Have A Plan

The problem is, it's faith based, just like everything else the admin. does...