Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lawmakers' Goal to Cap Executive Pay Meets Resistance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 11:48 AM
Original message
Lawmakers' Goal to Cap Executive Pay Meets Resistance
Source: The Washington Post

Congressional efforts to impose stringent restrictions on executive compensation appeared to be evaporating yesterday as House and Senate negotiators worked to fine-tune the compromise stimulus bill.

Provisions to impose a penalty on banks that paid hefty bonuses and to cap pay at $400,000 for all employees at firms applying for additional government funds did not survive the compromise, sources said.

The situation was in flux last night, but provisions in the Senate bill that called for a ban on bonuses for all companies receiving government funds also appeared to be headed to the chopping block, congressional sources said.

The provisions would go further than those announced by the Obama administration last week. They would target the 359 banks that have received government aid and essentially prohibit companies from paying anything other than a base salary, analysts said. The 25 highest-paid executives at each company would be subject to the ban.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/11/AR2009021104488.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm hoping restrictions will go into the final of the TARP.
Barney Frank seemed intent on that happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. stringent restrictions???
$400,000? or $500,000 are STRINGENT restrictions???
Give me a break!!

How many mansions, yachts, etc. can one person have? Reminds me of the dialog in "Chinatown" between Jack Nicholson and John Huston. What more do you want? "The future, Mr. Gittes, the future!" says the villain.
This is depressing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lugnut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm not resisting.
I doubt that most taxpayers are either. I guess they forgot that they work for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC