Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

PNC pays bonuses to execs after getting TARP money

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 09:35 PM
Original message
PNC pays bonuses to execs after getting TARP money
Source: Reuters

NEW YORK, Feb 13 (Reuters) - PNC Financial Services Group Inc (PNC.N) said on Friday it has awarded bonuses for 2008 to its chief executive and other top officers, becoming the largest recipient of taxpayer money under the government's $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program to do so.

Chief Executive James Rohr was awarded a $3 million bonus, down from $3.5 million a year earlier. PNC also awarded bonuses of $1.3 million to President Joseph Guyaux, $1.24 million to Senior Vice Chairman William Demchack, $785,400 to Vice Chairman Timothy Shack and $710,000 to Chief Financial Officer Richard Johnson.

The awards are primarily in the form of restricted stock, and none of the awards to Rohr, Demchak and Johnson is in cash, the Pittsburgh-based bank said. Executives were eligible for awards under a 1996 incentive plan, it said.

PNC disclosed the awards in a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filing, nine days after posting a $248 million loss and announcing plans to cut 5,800 jobs by 2011. Shares of the bank have fallen 67.5 percent from their record high Sept. 19.

"The issue is how in the world banks keep good people to get us out of the hole we're in," said Brent Longnecker, president of Longnecker & Associates in Houston, an executive compensation specialist. "You have to do the right thing, from an attraction, retention and motivation perspective."

Investors, politicians and regulators have faulted banks for doling out big bonuses as the industry hemorrhages losses from soured loans, and tightens credit generally.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/bondsNews/idUSN136517920090214



http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Riggs_Bank_N.A.

Riggs Bank N.A., founded in 1836, also called Riggs National Bank, "which provides banking services to most of Washington's foreign embassies and to American consulates worldwide," has been "swept up in controversy. Federal law enforcement officials, Congressional investigators and banking regulators are scouring Riggs accounts in a wide-ranging investigation revolving around the netherworlds of terrorist financing, money laundering and the seamier geopolitics of Big Oil," according to Timothy O'Brien's April 11, 2004, New York Times expose.

In July 2004 it was announced that Riggs was going to be bought out by PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. According to the Washington Post, "All Riggs branches will assume the PNC bank name... Meanwhile, PNC will dispense entirely with all of Riggs's international and embassy banking operations, which led to the problems Riggs faces today."

Bush family connections

As of May 2000, Jonathan J. Bush, brother of President George H.W. Bush, was "Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of J. Bush & Co., an investment management company he founded in 1970, which Riggs acquired in 1997", according to a Riggs Bank Press Release. At the same time, Mr. Jonathan J. Bush was also elected President & Chief Executive Officer and a Director of "RIMCO, a wholly owned investment management subsidiary".

News quotes

Timothy O'Brien, "Regulators Fine Riggs $25 Million," New York Times, May 14, 2004:
"Federal regulators fined the Riggs National Corporation, the parent company of Riggs Bank, $25 million yesterday for failing to report suspicious activity, the largest penalty ever assessed against a domestic bank in connection with money laundering.
"The fine stems from Riggs's failure over at least the last two years to actively monitor suspect financial transfers through Saudi Arabian and Equatorial Guinean accounts held by the bank. The accounts are still being scrutinized as possible conduits for terrorist funds or for the proceeds of graft."

"Bank fined $25 million in terrorism probe," CNN, May 13, 2004:

"The civil fine against the midsize Washington bank with a near-exclusive franchise on business with the capital's diplomatic community is the largest ever imposed on a financial institution for such violations, experts said. It had been expected.
"The action by the Treasury Department's Office of the Comptroller of the Currency came in an order made public late Thursday. It followed weeks of negotiations between Riggs officials and the banking regulators.

"The order said the bank's internal controls 'were, and continue to be, seriously deficient.'"

"Riggs said last month it is pulling back from its foreign operations and that the head of the family that controls the bank was resigning from the board of its parent company. Investors viewed the moves as steps toward recovery or a possible sale. ...

The bank also indicated that family patriarch Joe Allbritton, Riggs's former chief executive, is resigning as vice chairman of the parent company's board of directors. Timothy Coughlin, president of parent Riggs National Corp., also is resigning."

...more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wish I had a job that paid me a bonus for losing $248M
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I wish I had a job that paid me to write code.
Even what I was making after my 55% pay cut in late 2007 would be fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimmylavin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I wish I had a job.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaJudy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Amen! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. At what point can we just start seizing their assets?
Of the companies and their CEO's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. When they stop owning our government and courts.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Dunno. Do we have enough pitchforks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Time to do what Japan did
Nationalize the banks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. When is this shit gonna fucking stop!!!
I am so FUCKING tired of OUR money being used for this SHIT!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. Give it back, you THIEVES.
Oh, those greedy, entitled little pissants. I want them stripped to their boxers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. PNC had been hanging in there really well until the LEH
bankruptcy. They were avoiding many of the problems...then Lehman struck...then they bought NCC for which TARP money was helpful since NCC going down would have been kinda bad. Also, the stock is restricted...they cannot touch it and it must vest...they are highly motivated to get the stock price up by the time they can touch it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Getting the stock price up isn't exactly improving the business in all
cases, is it?

Repurchase of your own shares, talking heads pimping your business on CNBC and other casino tip sites, pay for play to brokers, outright forging of the books.

Let's give these guys exactly the same deal I've gotten since 1968 on every job I've had - if the company has a good year, and if you were part of that, a bonus is in order.

Company did poorly? May even have to take a cut or take a hike.

I've done both at different times.

But I never once thought I was "owed" a bonus in bad years, not do I think pumping stock prices is a substitute for running a business well.

Course, if your bonus is based on pumping stock prices, well....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
12. To what degree can you be so self-absorbed...
and arrogant to have not got the message that this shit will NOT stand?

These fuckers are just begging for shackles and long prison terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. Congress gave them the money without capping compensation. What did Congress expect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeoConsSuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. That is going to change:
Bonus Restrictions

Bonus restrictions will be imposed on senior executive officers and the next 20 highest-paid employees at companies that receive more than $500 million from TARP. Companies receiving between $250 million and $500 million will face restrictions on bonuses to their senior executive officers and their next 10 highest-paid workers. The limits will apply to the top five employees at companies receiving between $25 million and $250 million.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a9TTCsp0VS_8&refer=home
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. They will call them retention awards instead of bonuses. Besides, there is no limit on
comopensation that does not consist of cash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
16. The PNC deal was the dirtiest of all, IMO.
National City Bank, headquartered in Cleveland, asked for $700B in bailout funds. They were declined.

The $700B was given instead to PNC to BUY National City.

Three guesses where the Deputy Treasury Sec. (the guy who hands out the $$$) used to work, and it isn't National City.

The taxpayers who funded this shameful deal got zip:

1. Not more jobs (redunancy requires thousands of layoffs in a city already reeling from high unemployment)

2. Not a more competitive marketplace (banking consolidation squelches competition)

3. Not a cigarette or a goodbye kiss.


WHY we let these thugs rape us again and again I do not know.

:mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 04:53 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. jeez. giving them $$ to consolidate, & picking winners to boot.
seriously, they want a depression & riots.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norrin Radd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 04:18 AM
Response to Original message
17. sickness
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC