Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feds mount evidence in salmonella outbreak probe (pressure grows for ciminal charges)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 07:53 PM
Original message
Feds mount evidence in salmonella outbreak probe (pressure grows for ciminal charges)
Source: Associated Press

ATLANTA – First, federal investigators said Stewart Parnell knowingly shipped salmonella-tainted foods even after internal tests showed they were contaminated. Then they revealed the evidence: e-mails Parnell sent to his employees urging them to ship out the products that authorities say ultimately sickened hundreds and may have caused the deaths of nine.

Federal authorities, who started an investigation last month, have remained tightlipped about possible charges against Parnell. So has the FBI, which raided the company's Georgia plant about a week ago.

<snip>

Parnell's e-mails, released this week by House investigators, depict a man driven by profits who instructed his employees to ship out products despite reports that salmonella was detected. "Turn them loose," he said in one e-mail.

<snip>

Food safety watchdogs have long argued that the FDA doesn't pursue criminal charges enough in tainted food cases, but they have little doubt that investigators are building a case as public outrage grows.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090214/ap_on_bi_ge/salmonella_outbreak_prosecution
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
iandhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. there should be criminal charges
If we can make a example of this guy selling tainted food = a few years in the slammer maybe stuff like this wouldn't happen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Fine; so what will the punishment be? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Knowingly selling tainted food that caused death?
I think manslaughter charges would be in order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Manslaughter?
He should be charged with murder. That's what it was. Premeditated if you ask me. He KNOWINGLY ordered tainted products to be shipped.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Not to defend him
But he probably did not seriously believe that anyone would die eating his product. A lot of people ate his product and didn't die. Obviously though he was in the position to know that salmonella isn't something to mess around with. Ordering salmonella tainted product shipped is obviously worse than knowingly shipping product that has some minor defect, which is why he should be charged with something stronger than violating food standards laws. Manslaughter might be appropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. He was in a position to know that salmonella is
possibly lethal. Knowingly shipping a product tainted with a bacteria that could kill people is indefensible. He seriously didn't CARE that it could sicken and possibly kill people. That is also indefensible. People have sickened and died. He should get the maximum penalty. Too bad it can't be for murder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #12
23. I'd say this is a slam dunk murder case
which his expensive criminal lawyers will plead down , but with full restitution to the victims.

But then if this is tried in Texas State Courts, the entreprenooer {rhymes with manure sewer}

won't have much to worry about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. The comany officers that knowingly directed the shipment
of contaminated products should be charged with recklss endangerment. In those cases where deaths occured, reckless homicide should do. If convicted, they should be sentenced to what ever the law allows for such felonies. Believe that is many years in prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. How about the Directors
who were supposed to be supervising his actions?

and

the stock holders who financed and profited by his actions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. You're getting silly..
.... if you are against prosecuting these folks just say so.

If you are just confused, only those who knowingly authorized the shipment of tainted goods should be charged. I doubt anyone whose only relationship was "stockholder" would fit into that category.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. The directors do not supervise the day to day operatios of a company
That is what they pay the CEO. to do. If you had legal proof that they speciffically directed the CEO to ship tainted product, then they should also be be prosecuted on the same charges as the Company officers. If not, then it would be a waste of effort. Hold the people that actually made the decisions responsible for their actions. JMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. I think that the company is privately owned
Which means that he can do whatever he wants and remain president of the company. I'm not sure if he has other financial partners, but since he is primary owner, if they exist they have little say unless there are other factors like connections to the really big contracts. Mr. Parnell was essentially the company dictator, which made it harder for his employees to decide to the right thing and disobey him.
I also work at a privately owned food company and understand how it is to work under a company dictator who will tell you to do things that you know are completely wrong. Luckily our company dictator has taken cases like Mr. Parnell's to heart and we won't find us in such a situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Although they aren't completely guiltless
It might send a stronger message to private food company owners if the worst penalties are reserved for Mr. Parnell. At such companies, the president is the dictator and the dictator in this case gave the order. Yes, the managers could have chosen to sacrafice their jobs and disobey him. That would have been the right thing to do, but their actions make them no worse than the majority of Americans who worry about losing their job. Ultimately though for their actions, they will probably be out of work and their involvement will make it hard for them to get another job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. UpinArms, do you know who would be the best organization to write to regarding
this murderous Parnell criminal? The FDA? Or the AG of Georgia?
Can you imagine the agony of losing a beloved family member for no freaking reason, other than this man's pernicious actions?
Glad the heat's on him, I'd love to contribute to it via contact via the correct avenues -
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. nickyt, from the article -
Fred Pritzker, a food safety lawyer in Minneapolis who filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Peanut Corp., said investigators could charge Parnell with federal anti-conspiracy charges.

maybe these people would know where to direct your energies

:hi:

http://www.pritzkerlaw.com/

Accident and Personal Injury Lawyers

Our Minnesota accident and personal injury lawyers have decades of experience and a national reputation for excellence in the areas of personal injury and wrongful death.

Attorneys Fred Pritzker, Elliot Olsen, and Eric Hageman have been named Minnesota "Super Lawyers" by Law & Politics magazine in 2008. In addition, Fred Pritzker has been named a "Top 40 Personal Injury Super Lawyer" and a "Top 100 Super Lawyer" in MN by Law & Politics magazine. In addition, Fred Pritzker has been selected for inclusion in the 2008 edition of The Best Lawyers in America.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. 10-4, I'll be writing them - many thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phaseolus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yep, those libertarians are right.
Given an unfettered free market, those Captains of Industry we're supposed to worship will always do what's right, because their enlightened self-interest will always work toward the common good.

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. they want lots of small entrepooneurs doing all the action
'coz people will buy the non-poisoned brands on the free market
Me: But we won't know which one's deadly until it's too late. They don't tell us beforehand. There's nobody to make them.
Libertarian: *stares for 5 sec.* But what about Prohibition?! All legislation has to fail!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. More recalls - from the Texas plant
Food Lion's sending these out to their MVP members:


Dear Valued Customer,

As an MVP card holder and as one of our customers who has indicated a desire for e-mail messages from us, we are sending you this alert regarding additional peanut products recalled today by National Raisin, one of our suppliers. The recall is due to an inspection by the Texas Department of Health at the Peanut Corporation of America's plant in Plainview, Texas.

The following Food Lion and Bloom products are being recalled:

PRODUCT UPC/GTIN# Size

Food Lion Raisin and Nut Trail Mix 3582606484 6 oz.
Food Lion Fruit and Nut Trail Mix 3582606485 6 oz.
Food Lion Winter Blend Trail Mix 3582606486 6 oz.
Food Lion Nut Seed Bry Trail Mix 3582606487 6 oz.
Bloom Raisin and Nut Trail Mix 72543992166 6 oz.
Bloom Fruit and Nut Trail Mix 72543992167 6 oz.
Bloom Winter Blend Trail Mix 72543992168 6 oz.
Bloom Nut Seed Bry Trail Mix 72543992169 6 oz.

We are asking consumers to return these items to the store for a full refund.

At this time, a number of products containing peanut butter, peanut paste or peanuts have been recalled; however, peanut butter sold in jars at our stores is not affected.



JHC, what this turd did was criminal. SOB had the nerve and audacity to plead the fricking 5th amendment and is now going to file for bankrupcy! :wtf:

I hope they put murdering sack of shit under the jail and he never sees the light of day for the rest of his miserable life. Every dime he made should be taken away from him and his family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. The old corporate charter...profits before anything. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antimatter98 Donating Member (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. Why isn't this considered a terrorist act against Americans?
The Patriot Act can be applied here. Let's send
the perps to Gitmo for a while.

This is a terrorist act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
11. Gee, maybe if Dubya hadn't stripped the FDA of most of it's funding the agency could have had a more
forceful response to the salmonella, one that had teeth, and saved hundreds of people from getting sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NBachers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
13. Time for The China Solution
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #13
25. Yea China doesn't mess around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
22. I think the DoJ is back in business
Bush's cronies and other white collar criminals are in deep doo-doo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC