Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Huge protest over Irish economy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 01:27 PM
Original message
Huge protest over Irish economy
Source: BBC


Marchers said they wanted to avoid taking strike action
---------

Many are angry at plans to impose a pension levy on public sector workers. Trade union organisers of the march said workers did not cause the economic crisis but were having to pay for it. In a statement, the Irish government said it recognised that the measures it was taking were "difficult and in some cases painful".

There were conflicting estimates of the numbers of people at the march, which began on the north side of Dublin in the mid-afternoon. Police said 100,000 people were on the streets, while organisers said they expected 200,000 to protest in total.

The Irish Congress of Trade Unions (Ictu), which organised the march, said it was campaigning for "a fairer and better way" of dealing with the economic crisis. "Our priority is about ensuring that people are looked after, the interests of people are looked after, not the interests of big business or the wealthy," Sally-Anne Kinahan, Ictu's secretary general, told the BBC.

One protester said he was "sick and tired of the way this government conducts itself and what it's doing to this country." "I've worked all my life, I've never broke the law, never walked out on strike. Instead I've went to work and done my job," he said. "I've a mortgage to pay, I've children to put through school, and now I'm being told I have to take cutback, after cutback, after cutback."

Read more: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7903518.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's that whole potato thing again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cigsandcoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
22. "That potato thing" saw a million people die...
...and is still quite fresh for the Irish today. Would you make a Holocaust reference if Jews were marching in the streets?

My point is this: If you're trying to be clever, it didn't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. You misunderstood me sorry I was not more clear
Edited on Sun Feb-22-09 02:01 PM by seemslikeadream
I believe we are on the same page about this


My great grandmothers parents were killed in County Wexford around 1800, she came here as an orphan

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost in CT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Unfortunately the Irish are stuck with a lot of Foreign workers that refuse to go home.
One hopes that once the foreigners are repatriated into their own lands unemployment and the strains of social services will improve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. towns of immigrants have formed in areas
My in-law in Galway tells us about this. An entire town has formed of Polish immigrants just north west of where he lives. They wait for a bus to take them to their jobs every day (well if they still have jobs that is).

Poland is just one country of many that have had many many people flock to Ireland to live.

Other countries include: Brazil, Scotland, Nigeria, and Latvia just to name a few.

Global warming is also take a huge toll in Ireland.

All is very far from "well" sadly. :(

:dem: :kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. I've looked through the article, and on Google news
but I still cannot determine exactly what a "pension levy on public sector workers" is. It sounds like it might be some sort of reduction in wages for government workers, but that word "pension" is throwing me here.

I guess the protesters would rather see some of their co-workers laid off instead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It's essentially a dressed up pay cut
Labour argues that it's going to hit the lowest paid workers the hardest.

Sound familiar?

It's explained here:

http://www.rte.ie/money/2009/0203/budget.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Thanks, that does explain it
However, I couldn't help but notice the following:

"Contributions will be deducted from gross pay by employers before income tax, PRSI and health levies are calculated and as such pension contributions will be effectively relieved of tax at the marginal rate."

Sounds like a better deal than I get with my FICA and Medicare taxes, I have to pay state and federal income tax on the sums deducted from my paycheck for those programs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Princess Turandot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #11
31. Pension contributions are usually pre-tax here as well...
such as payments into 401k's & 403b's. There are caps but they are fairly high. IRAs are also deductible pre-tax, subject to a cap.

My assumption is that they are requiring the employees to make a contribution to their pensions which they likely do not make now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtbrick Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. There goes the Emerald Miracle that the
Edited on Sat Feb-21-09 02:15 PM by jtbrick
Capitalist pig, corporate suck up right wing had been touting few years ago. It's the failure of their policies in a nutshell! It's the folly of business over people.

Only Government can end this cycle of boom and bust!


Was this dramatic change the luck of the Irish? Not at all. It resulted from a series of hard-headed decisions that shifted Ireland from big government stagnation to free market growth. After years of high inflation, double-digit unemployment rates, and soaring government debt that topped 100 percent of GDP, Irish policymakers began to cut spending in the late 1980s in a desperate bid to recover financial stability.

Irish government spending fell from more than 50 percent of GDP in the 1980s to 34 percent by 2005. For Europe that is a triumph of restraint, given that the average size of government across 25 EU countries today is 47 percent of GDP.

And Ireland has steadily reduced its tax rates. The top individual income tax rate was cut from 65 percent in 1985 to 42 percent today. The capital-gains tax rate was cut from 40 to 20 percent in 1999.

However, the key to Ireland’s success has been its excellent tax climate for business. In 1980, Ireland established a corporate tax rate for manufacturing of just ten percent. That low rate was subsequently extended to high-technology, financial services, and other industries. More recently, Ireland established a flat 12.5 percent tax rate on all corporations — one of the lowest rates in the world, and just one-third of the U.S. rate.


http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NzUzMzA0N2UxM2E0MTg4Mzk5YmI1Zjk3YzU4ZGVlZmE=

Is there any doubt left that we must heed Marx and Engles?

http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/wage-labour/ch09.htm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Marx and Engles have been tried and found wanting. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtbrick Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. And free market capitalism hasn't?
Capitalistic corporate and individual greed has proved to be an EPIC-FAIL. Centralized Government planning and worker ownership of the means of production needs to be imposed.

Obama said, "It is only government that can break the vicious cycle."

From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.

All that a man owns is his labor!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Obama is NOT a Marxist, though some on the right claim that he is.
Edited on Sat Feb-21-09 02:58 PM by pnwmom
As to your question about whether the free market has been tried. Those on the far right argue vehemently that it has not, that market restrictions and taxes have been the real problem -- just as those on the far left would argue that we've never had a pure Marxist government.

Those who would promote either extreme fail to take into account human nature.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Cute platitudes that have been tried and failed in our lifetimes
Centralized planning is the largest of the epic fails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. A smart bet would be that the poster wasn't serious
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. There are enough academics who still thinks Marx matters that I
take comments that way as serious vice jocular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. How many academics have read Capital (both books) or Wealth of Nations?
Edited on Sat Feb-21-09 07:04 PM by depakid
Pretty esoteric stuff.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I think those and others are banned
Seriously, career academics who have done nothing outside the University often lack the real world experience to give perspective and depth to their instruction. From where I sit as a 2nd career academic, there is clear divide in many faculties that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Understood- yet seriously
Edited on Sat Feb-21-09 07:55 PM by depakid
Those are tough reads.

So are articles expanding on them.

Kinda end up flipping though dogear pages and/or otherwise checking cites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Another divide is between humanities professors and some of
the other colleges, for example, engineering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. True enough
Edited on Sat Feb-21-09 08:36 PM by depakid
On the other hand, there are places that still reckon- and still believe:

Doctrina Urbi Serviat.

(Our knowledge gained will serve our community) - or some such thing...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
27. I thought "acedemics" were pimping Derrida, Foucault, and other Postmodernist garbage nowdays.
Marx is dead. Unfortunately he got replaced with something even worse, Postmodernist sophistry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. I'm on the geek side...we aren't allowed know about such things
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Or that the poster has motives
other than to contribute to a serious discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Traveler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. If ya don't have a plan
Edited on Sun Feb-22-09 10:39 PM by The Traveler
then ya have a plan to fail.

Centralized planning is necessary for those things the market cannot be expected to accommodate. For example, a nation can plan for future energy crunches and ecological impact by mandating through policy and law development, implementation, and deployment of technologies that achieve established requirements. An enterprise compelled to maximize investor profits cannot be expected to impose that kind of burden on itself.

Now how those requirements are met ... it turns out markets are really good at figuring at the hows of things. Centralized planning gets into trouble when it mandates stuff like "30% of all fuel will be made of corn based ethanol". Better to say, "30% of all fuel will be based on non fossil based alternatives, suitable for combustion in OBD-II compliant or better internal combustion engines, and which are limited to x milligrams net carbon emissions per joule", or something like that. I think you get the idea.

Markets suck at determining long term requirements. We've known about the potential for climate change and the national security risks of dependency on foreign fuel sources for over a generation. Free markets have accomplished precious little to address the requirements implicit in that knowledge. It is my argument it is unreasonable to assume that markets would (or could) do so.

The lesson learned from the past fifty years I think is clear. When governments intrude too heavily in realms best addressed by market forces, things get bogged down. When people count on markets to self regulate and address long term requirements that do not directly boost short term profits, things blow up.

Just my take on it.

Trav

**edited to clean up a couple of really pooly worded phrases **
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. The problem is that centralized planning fails to account or react adequately to distruptive
technologies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Traveler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. Elucidate
I presume you mean "disruptive technologies". Define, please.

My next question would be "What characteristic of free markets makes them automatically superior than governments in their response to these technologies?" For example, what is the free market solution to the introduction of the "Johnny Science Biological Weapons Lab Kit for Angry Adolescent Extremists"? (Certainly, that would be a disruptive technology ...)

My follow up question would be: "What constitutes a superior response?"

There is something axiomatic about much political discussion. Axiom: "Government is less efficient than the free market." Is this really an axiom ... an assumption, from which logical discussion can follow? Or is it a conclusion of logical discussion which deserves analysis and possible contradiction? It was once a conclusion. This conclusion is usually presented as an article of faith, an established fact. I do not accept that ... I think that it is a statement that is quite open, and indeed vulnerable, to analysis.

I have a problem with the word "efficiency" ... a word slung by free marketeers on a regular basis. As an engineer I have been taught to always ask, "Efficient with respect to what value/parameter?" My heavily modified 1991 Camaro with the 350 ci V-8 and over sized throttle body injectors very efficiently converts gasoline to torque. However, it is somewhat less efficient at turning a gallon of gas into miles traveled. Free market economies seem to have become efficient at turning the talent and effort of workers into cash for the rich, and far less efficient at contributing to the economic structures that provide the basis of a dynamic culture capable of adapting to unforeseen events. Pardon me if I have a problem with that.

I am not sure why corporate bureaucracies are inherently superior to government bureaucracies. The usual arguments are, after 30 years in corporate America, less than convincing to me.

For these reasons, and the course of recent events, the axioms of free market ideology can no longer be sacrosanct fundamental statements or assumptions.

None of the above should indicate to you I am a fan of centrally planned economies. Rather, I advocate that it is possible to achieve a creative tension between active markets and active government can be quite productive to the national interest. I propose that there are some areas in which we cannot expect businesses to perform in a manner that advances the public good, and that in those areas government must needs exert its influence.


Trav
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. Central Planning is an EPIC-FAIL.
The lie that socialism automatically refers to central planning is right-wing BS, same with the Right-wing lie conflating Capitalism with Free Enterprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trthnd4jstc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. End the Tyranny of Banking over Humanity. End Fake Money created by Debt. Have a Currency Based On
Labor. Labor should be the Basis for all currency. End the Rule of the Rich over the rest of us. They are no better, nor any smarter than the rest of us. There desires should never carry more weight than any other group of people end Tyranny. The collapse of the global economy is tied to the collapse of the financial industry. The problem is lack of sufficient regulation, created by A$$holes who control our governments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainegreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's Hugh!
O'Mally.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
24. Sorry I'm too late to recommend this. THANKS FOR POSTING!
The Irish workers' message is clear and compelling: DON'T TAKE THE CRISIS CREATED BY THE RICH OUT OF THE HIDES OF THE POOR!

Hear that, President Obama? Hear that, Congress? The Irish are not the only people who are onto this putrid Bushwhack game!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC