|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
sabra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-09 11:47 AM Original message |
(Senator) Byrd gives Obama heat over 'Czars' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gormy Cuss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-09 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
1. Byrd's right. It's time for this "Czar" crap to stop. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-09 11:54 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scytherius (576 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-09 12:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Respectfully disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gormy Cuss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-09 12:27 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. That may be true but the Czar nonsense is shifting the perception to these being executive branch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-09 05:31 PM Response to Reply #1 |
22. Yep. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tularetom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-09 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
2. Did he ever bitch about kkkarl rove, WH "czar" of everyfuckinthing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sutz12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-09 11:56 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Actually, he did... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
biopowertoday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-09 12:17 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. yes, and it is a very valid concern. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tularetom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-09 12:37 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. Well Byrd is the only one still around who remembers when there were real czars |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-09 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
3. Oh please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bertman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-09 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
7. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this "executive privilege right" just another made-up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sutz12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-09 01:21 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. You're wrong... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bertman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-09 01:25 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. That's my point, sutz12. It's exactly that: a question. It seems that a strong Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
biopowertoday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-09 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
9. Thank you Sen. Byrd. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apnu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-09 05:33 PM Response to Reply #9 |
23. Where the hell was this under the Bush admin? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happygoluckytoyou (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-09 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
11. RIGHT ON!!! no more czars... we need some...despots and kings, but enuf of the czars.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-09 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
13. Byrd's correct. We've had enough unitary executive and executive privilege. Our Constitution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marshall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-09 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
16. Byrd is really going out on a limb here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seeking Serenity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-09 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
17. Byrd gives Obama heat over 'Czars' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-09 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
18. Byrd is 100% correct. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lost in CT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-09 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
19. Byrd is on target with this one for a multitude of reasons. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoxFan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-09 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
20. Grumpy Old Man |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alarimer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-09 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
21. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blueclown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-09 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
24. Byrd is 100% correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Apr 20th 2024, 12:43 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC