Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush should have executed Gitmo detainees, says former CIA officer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 11:29 AM
Original message
Bush should have executed Gitmo detainees, says former CIA officer
Source: Raw Story


Bush should have executed Gitmo detainees, says former CIA officer
David Edwards and Rachel Oswald
Published: Friday February 27, 2009

A former CIA officer has said its ridiculous that the Bush administration didn't execute numerous prisoners at Guantanamo Bay, regardless of whether they have had a trial, when it had the chance.

"Many of those individuals that are there are enemy combatants and that's based on the Geneva Conventions and should be executed," said Gary Berntsen, who spent 20 years with the CIA, to Fox's Gretchen Carlson on the show, Fox & Friends. "It's ridiculous that the Bush administration, after seven years, didn't deal with many of those that we know are enemy combatants."

Berntsen, who commanded a team of CIA and special forces in Afghanistan in 2001, is the author of The Attack on bin Laden and Al-Qaeda: A Personal Account by the CIA's Key Field Commander. A Bush supporter, he sued the federal government to win the right to release his book, which detailed his experiences hunting for Osama bin Laden in the Tora Bora region of Afghanistan. In 2008, Berntsen also actively campaigned for John McCain.

Carlson seemed to agree with Berntsen assertion saying of the detainees, "I'm thinking to myself, they've been, many of them, there since 2002. What was the wait?"

Read more: http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Fox_guest_Bush_should_have_executed_0227.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. hell, why not just gas a bunch of 'em at once? More efficient...
And anyway, since we're clearly morally superior, who cares about methods?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. These people (Berntsen, etc) should be exiled to Afghanistan
IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. Now why would you wish that upon Afghanistan?
Just send them to the World Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malletgirl02 Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #23
39. You are Right
Afghanistan has enough problems, the last thing they need is that psychopath former CIA agent running around. The Hague is the best course of action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. Because dead people (and children) tell no tales
This is certainly delightful, isn't it? I can't imagine what ritualistic sadism this piece of work Gary Berntsen was involved in. And, true to form, the Senate Intelligence Committee's proposed "investigation of the CIA's detention and interrogation programs under President George W. Bush" is planned to be a whitewash from the beginning with it's statement that "the inquiry was not designed to determine whether CIA officials broke laws."

Fox's desire to start this idea going is understandable as I'm sure they were all set to make a reality series around it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. That's why the need to get Saddam done & over with
Couldn't have him chatting it up with any investigations, could we?

I am sure I will get flamed foor saying this, and here is my disclaimer that I am not a Saddam supporter in any way. I'm just saying that he should have been imprisoned until after the war, not tried and hanged in the heat of the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truth2power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. You'll get no flame from me...
We supported Saadam back in the day, and we were even instrumental in putting him in power in the first place.

We wanted him dead because he could have started running his mouth about our complicity in various operations we wanted to keep hidden.

When he was hanged, I didn't feel sorry for him. It had nothing to do with the fact that he was a tyrant and a thug. I figured he was just too stupid to live on account of ever having put his trust in the American government. Whatta moron!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #20
44. No, no flame here
I thought of that when they executed him--then I thought about Noriega. There must be a lot of skeletons in someone's closet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yes, and Nixon should have burned the tapes
Seems we've been down this path before. :evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. Charming
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. And This Is Why JFK Wanted to Shut Down Poppy's CIA
Is Blackwater the backup, in the event somebody actually can clean out that nest of vipers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. Guilty until proven innocent doesn't work if you execute the guy.
It's bad enough they suspended habeas corpus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well at least this makes it clear to anyone who had any doubts that
some working for the CIA support breaking the law. Hell, he thinks the law is ridiculous, as long as we are doing it of course. John Yoo and David Addington step aside, Obama, you have just met your new poster boy for why there needs to be a special prosecutor to confront the abuse of power by the Bush administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. Um, one of my mother's friends was a Gitmo detainee
he WORKED FOR A CHRISTIAN MISSIONARY GROUP but was hauled down to Gitmo because of his Muslim name and the fact that he was born in the Sudan. He spent six months there before the missionary group could convince them that he wasn't a Muslim extremist. Now if an administrator with International Friendships Christian Missions can end up at Gitmo, can't pretty much ANYONE with a Muslim name?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
14thColony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. This type of lawless, immoral thinking has become so entrenched
I am not sure if we can step back from the abyss anymore. 10 years ago this would have been a shocking statement. Now it passes with little notice.

I hope there is an afterlife, and I hope Thomas Jefferson beats Gary Bernsten's ass with an iron bar for all eternity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. Kill more innocent people
I'm surprised they didn't kill them all too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. hateful, mean, self loathing man
so so many of them seem to be part of the bush team. I cannot even begin to fathom these people's minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. Maybe there were too many
human rights on-lookers for them to get away with it? Otherwise, I would think tidying up those loose ends would have been a major priority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. "commanded a team of CIA and special forces in Afghanistan in 2001"

Fail.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
15. Yeah, that whole due process thing is pretty overrated
Just ask Mr. Berntsen. He can tell if someone's bad just by looking at them. Just walk folks past him for a thumbs up or a thumbs down. Far more efficient and far less "ridiculous," to use Mr. Berntsen's own word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nbcouch Donating Member (209 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
16. History is replete
with cases of "known criminals" who were summarily executed and then exonerated posthumously. Some of these cases have even played out in modern times, as opposed to the Dark Ages, but if it's the Dark Ages the CIA wants to return to, by all means, let them. Just don't drag us there with ya, okay boys?

I would like to know if any of Berntsen's "known enemy combatants" are juveniles, since we know there are juveniles who have been held at Guantanamo Bay. Were any of the hundreds who were held there and then released without charges, much less a trial, previously "known" to be "enemy combatants"?

Moreover, why does Berntsen want us to behave like the barbarians we are supposed to be fighting? If this is the way we should be defending America, then America is not worth defending.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. If this is the way we should be defending America, then America is not worth defending.
AMEN to that, my friend.

NOT in MY name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
17. Didn't we, in fact, do this? (torture some people TO DEATH)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
primavera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
18. Thank gawd he's a "FORMER CIA officer"
Although I suppose what that really means is that he's now gone to work for Blackwater where he can torture and murder with impunity and get paid more through no-bid government contracts than he was making as a humble civil servant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
19. The American Taliban speaks !
GITMO is a Concentraion Camp for TERRORISTS.
They are in GITMO, so they must be TERRORISTS!!
Off with their heads!

Simple logic for the Simple Minded.
This will really resonate with the Conservative Base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
21. hmm, in Honduras, during Gen. Gustavo Alvarez's 1980-84 reign of terror,
he had his own butchers butchered, to close any loose ends (Donald Schulz, The United States, Honduras, and the Crisis in Central America)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
22. Yeah, don't try to determine whether or not they're guilty of anything, just execute them.
Why create tensions with China, just execute the Uyghurs that were guilty only of opposing Chinese rule over their people.

If you kill the innocent along with the guilty, you'll also get the guilty. And if you do it without the least due process, you'll totally erase the distinction, anyway. After all, then you will be among the guilty, among the terrorists. And since the world will know what you've done, many more terrorists will arise in revulsion against you. So you will have simplified the job of identifying terrorists -- everyone will be a terrorist. That will greatly simplify things: just terminate the entire population of the world.

Wow, those CIA folks sure can play with logic, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
24. Please God don't let this article get out to the rest of the world.
Too late.

Oh well, the world already thinks we're about the lowest of hypocritical scum after the past 8 years.

We should have EXECUTED POWs REGARDLESS whether they'd had any kind of trial whatsofucking ever???

So should we have GASSED them???

Holy fuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nbcouch Donating Member (209 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Berntsen belongs
to the same class who would lecture us on the "original intent" of the Founders, and the framers of the Constitution and the Republic itself, and then twist the words of those noble citizens beyond all recognition. That is to say, he is a standard issue Neoconservative fascist, or nihilist, if you prefer. We as a nation rejected totalitarian rule over 200 years ago, but this crowd loves it. Bush, with his not so Freudian slip all those years ago, said it all: "If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
27. Somebody should point out that the same could be said about
quite a few CIA jackals. Especially those who operating in Central and South America. I mean, weren't they down there enabling terrorism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #27
45. and that's the crux of our foreign turmoil
does the CIA aid and protect the US or are they a protection racket for major international corporations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnie624 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. I just happen to be reading this essay:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downtown Hound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
29. CIA-the most undemocratic institution in the U.S.
Far from helping us, most of the time they are the ones that create the very enemies that we end up sending kids to fight and die years later. The agency either needs to be dissolved or put under the control of an independent review boards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeep789 Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
30. If Bush were smart he would have not only executed the
detainees but also the guards and CIA officers to eliminate all the evidence. Luckily, for the officer's sake, Bush isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
31. As a former CIA Officer and former member of that unit (SAD).
Edited on Fri Feb-27-09 04:35 PM by formercia
I recommend you watch this video to see what happened to those who didn't make it to Gitmo:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x4902904#4902943
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnie624 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #31
42. Interesting. Thanks for the link.
Edited on Sat Feb-28-09 02:14 PM by ronnie624
Always searching for al Qaeda, but never quite finding it; only people who are caught up in circumstances created by U.S. foreign policy and many years of intervention by the CIA. Most of our 'enemies' in Afghanistan are guilty of little more than living in a region of the world that is central to the struggle for access to and domination over hydrocarbons.

Every time I hear cable 'news' people like the four buffoons featured in the OP, discussing any aspect of the "war on terror" as if it was real, I feel as though I'm trapped in a bizarre world where logic and reason no longer exist. I wonder if these people are truly unaware of the obvious chain of historical events that have led to the current situation in Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Logic and reason never did exist.
People read the book '1984' and wondered if it could ever happen, when in fact, they were part of the real-life version.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
32. So which chapter of the Geneva conventions says that captured enemy combatants should be executed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. Not only that, but I'd love to know Berntsen's definition of "enemy combatant."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
33. One might call that murder given 55% of the people at one time
Edited on Fri Feb-27-09 04:49 PM by mmonk
there had engaged in no combat at all against the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
34. And here we get a glimpse of how the mindset that let the CIA
assassinate and torture with impunity is still alive and well. Not to mention drug running and too much else to mention.

Why does it not surprise me he's a Bush supporter? Pure evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
35. Wild guess: Berntsen and Carlson are both Republicans who actually believe they are
pro law and order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
37. Good lord, what a monster. Imagine all the heinous acts he committed
when he was with the CIA. Someone needs to weed these types of monsters out of the system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malletgirl02 Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
38. Berntsen
Berntsen is a nutcase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sivafae Donating Member (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
40. I guess that would have been one "solution." eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GinaMaria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
41. How, how did someone even think for a second that this was
an okay thing to say out loud let alone to the press? This says he thinks there is nothing wrong with this statement. And that is the frightening part of this. Do you have to be like this before joining the CIA or does the CIA create agents who think like this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davekriss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
46. Since when is it OK to execute prisoners of war at whim?
Berntsen used the term "enemy combatants", not the Bushonian "unlawful combatants", so by his own words the prisoners at Guantanamo are subject to the protections found in the Geneva Convention. You don't get to simply take a prisoner outside and shoot them just because we are at war with the nation they are from. That would be a clear war crime. Berntsen is advocating war crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
48. If only Bush had done the right thing, declared himself Dictator and
declared the Constitution null and void, then none of this ugly discussion would even be happening now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC