Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Pension Insurer Shifted to Stocks Ahead of Sept. Plunge

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 02:20 AM
Original message
U.S. Pension Insurer Shifted to Stocks Ahead of Sept. Plunge
Source: Boston Globe

WASHINGTON - Just months before the start of last year's stock market collapse, the federal agency that insures the retirement funds of 44 million Americans departed from its conservative investment strategy and decided to put much of its $64 billion insurance fund into stocks.

Switching from a heavy reliance on bonds, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation decided to pour billions of dollars into speculative investments such as stocks in emerging foreign markets, real estate, and private equity funds.

The agency refused to say how much of the new investment strategy has been implemented or how the fund has fared during the downturn. The agency would only say that its fund was down 6.5 percent - and all of its stock-related investments were down 23 percent - as of last Sept. 30, the end of its fiscal year. But that was before most of the recent stock market decline and just before the investment switch was scheduled to begin in earnest.

(snip)

Nonetheless, analysts expressed concern that large portions of the trust fund might have been lost at a time when many private pension plans are suffering major losses. The guarantee fund would be the only way to cover the plans if their companies go into bankruptcy.

Read more: http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2009/03/30/pension_insurer_shifted_to_stocks/




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 03:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. eh, just months before, what a coincidence. sure are a lot of them these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. This could be HUGE.
"The truth is, this could be huge," said Zvi Bodie, a Boston University finance professor who in 2002 advised the agency to rely almost entirely on bonds. "This has the potential to be another several hundred billion dollars. If the auto companies go under, they have huge unfunded liabilities" in pension plans that would be passed on to the agency.

In addition, Peter Orszag, head of the White House Office of Management and Budget, has "serious concerns" about the agency, according to an Obama administration spokesman.

Last year, as director of the Congressional Budget Office, Orszag expressed alarm that the agency was "investing a greater share of its assets in risky securities," which he said would make it "more likely to experience a decline in the value of its portfolio during an economic downturn the point at which it is most likely to have to assume responsibility for a larger number of underfunded pension plans."

However, Charles E.F. Millard, the former agency director who implemented the strategy until the Bush administration departed on Jan. 20, dismissed such concerns. Millard, a former managing director of Lehman Brothers, said flatly that "the new investment policy is not riskier than the old one."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. This guy was Managing Director of defaulted REIT, Broadway Partners
Edited on Mon Mar-30-09 07:02 AM by leveymg
Under his direction, that company went on a buying binge of $13 billion of high-profile commercial real estate properties across the country. Then the whole edifice came crashing down. Bought high - sell low to the receivers. Great business savvy, this gent.

Extreme risk-taker. Right-wing columnist for the NY Post. Just the kind you want to head a pension guarantee agency. See,

REIT Wrecks | High Yield REITs and Commercial Real Estate ...Jan 12, 2009 ... Boston's Hancock Tower Goes Into Default. Broadway Partners, the heavily indebted private equity firm that purchased Boston’s landmark ...
http://www.reitwrecks.com/2009/01/bostons-hancock-tower-goes-into-default.html - 49k -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
25. Yea, and he was hired when? by whom?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 04:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. so they are a Federal Agency but playing the stocks? I don't get it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. Not a federal agency, exactly. Read the story.
Edited on Mon Mar-30-09 08:06 PM by elleng
And they have to 'play' something, considering their job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. just picture how well Social Security would be doing now,
if they ratbastards could have given it to wall street 7 years ago. Imagine how many people would be destitute. And they're coming for it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 06:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. The ratbastards ARE coming for it again
We must not let them destroy Social Security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. crap..
We are all still sliding down that rusty razor, aren't we.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. Keith O says it the best - "why Daddy went to jail"
'cept none of these assholes will...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
9. Probably at bush's request to prop up the market long enough for mccain to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
End Of The Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
10. Betcha they did a credit default swap
with AIG!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
11. Separation: Church and State. Separation: Federal and Wall Street.
Edited on Mon Mar-30-09 09:13 AM by peacetalksforall
The people have been taken to the cleaners by the Republican Party - the party of wall streeters, reverends, corporate media, weapons and war providers and 'serviceers' and lobbyists and politicians who facilitate the crime. And some Dems are not far behind.

We are heading to the rank of the most criminal nation in the world.

Where was the oversight from Congress?






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Diadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
12. That makes me so angry. PBGC has my husband's pension.
Why wouldn't they keep that money in safe investments instead of taking the risk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
13. Pension Insurer Shifted To Stocks (Federal Agency Under Bush Bought Risk Just Before Market Crashed)
Source: Boston Globe

Just months before the start of last year's stock market collapse, the federal agency that insures the retirement funds of 44 million Americans departed from its conservative investment strategy and decided to put much of its $64 billion insurance fund into stocks.

Switching from a heavy reliance on bonds, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation decided to pour billions of dollars into speculative investments such as stocks in emerging foreign markets, real estate, and private equity funds. ...

Nonetheless, analysts expressed concern that large portions of the trust fund might have been lost at a time when many private pension plans are suffering major losses. The guarantee fund would be the only way to cover the plans if their companies go into bankruptcy.

Charles E.F. Millard, the former agency director who implemented the strategy until the Bush administration departed on Jan. 20, dismissed such concerns. Millard, a former managing director of Lehman Brothers, said flatly that "the new investment policy is not riskier than the old one." ...


Read more: http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2009/03/30/pension_insurer_shifted_to_stocks/?page=full
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. The sheer GALL of these bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. They couldn't get SS into the market but they got these guys in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. that was my thought, exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Good God -
I am ready to take to the streets. Where do we meetup?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marketcrazy1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. looking for their performance data, finding other interesting info
In the US, the asset base of pension plans for the various government workers is huge. At the end of October 2008, the $4 Trillion assets held by these plans had fallen by roughly $1 Trillion. As these plans are defined-benefit plans, the governments will make efforts to fill the gap in the future years either by raising the contributions from current employees or by raising taxes. However this does not affect the social security plan since those assets are not invested in the markets.

If employers go under taking the defined-pension plans with them, then the Federal agency Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) guarantees payment to plan participants. However this creates a huge liability for the federal government.

According to a Mercer study in the US, the pension plans of the S&P 1500 companies have lost half a Trillion $ in 2008, of which 80% was lost in the last quarter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. The number of people in plans that are now run by PBGC is growing
Edited on Mon Mar-30-09 10:39 AM by TayTay
There annual reports, since the year 1995, are http://www.pbgc.gov/about/annreports.html">online at their site. PBGC currently is responsible for the plans of 44 million Americans. The liability for this could grow to $500 billion dollars and require a massive bailout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. I wonder if the government borrows from the plans like they borrow from SS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. Is It Me Or Does It Look Like Someone, Somewhere Had A Plan And Implemented It.......
to bankrupt this country? The more and more that gets revealed every day - makes me wonder if this was a plan that was set in motion purposely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Paulson would have known in January 2007 how dangerous that decision would be because

If he participated in the decision............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theblasmo Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. I still think...
... the Repubs were trying to make it so that when Obama took office, he'd have all this crash around him, but it got out of control earlier than they expected, so they had to try and "fix it". Given their politics of the past few years, I wouldn't be surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #13
23. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC