Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'Jane Roe' Arrested at Supreme Court Hearing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 04:30 PM
Original message
'Jane Roe' Arrested at Supreme Court Hearing
Source: Washington Post

The woman at the center of the Supreme Court's landmark abortion rights ruling was arrested today at the confirmation hearing for Sonia Sotomayor among a wave of anti-abortion protesters who lined the sidewalks outside the Senate office buildings and several of whom made it into the hearing room and disrupted in an attempt to disrupt the proceedings.

Norma McCorvey, 61, of Texas, better known as "Jane Roe" in the famous Roe v. Wade case from January 1973, was arrested after she and another protester started yelling during the opening statement of Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.), according to Capitol Police. McCorvey, whose pursuit of the right to access to abortion in the early 1970s led to the ruling that has been a pivotal part of every Supreme Court nomination process since, eventually become a leading opponent of the procedure.

Sgt. Kimberly Schneider of the Capitol Police said McCorvey and Francis Mahoney, 68, of Florida were charged with unlawful conduct for disrupting Congress, the third and fourth such arrests the police made during the more than five-hour proceedings. McCorvey was part of the group of protesters outside the Hart Senate Office Building throughout the day, a gathering led by Randall Terry, the former head of Operation Rescue, an organization dedicated to ending abortion.

The last two rows of the hearing room were reserved for about 50 members of the public, who rotate into the hearings for short intervals and then must be escorted out to allow other citizens to view the historic proceedings. McCorvey and Mahoney were part of a group being escorted out as Franken was praising the service of Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.), a staunch supporter of the Roe decision. Kennedy left the Judiciary Committee earlier this year, making this the first Supreme Court confirmation fight without his presence since 1965.


Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/13/AR2009071302345.html?hpid=topnews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. How bizarre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasquatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Typical dumbass redneck
Sorry southerner DUers thay you have to live with these people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I don't think Roe is your typical "redneck"
Seems like a woman with an identity crisis that wants to try her hand at all sorts of different lifestyles, from being a lesbian to being a fundie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
musette_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
32. seems like she is mentally ill
i have compassion for her as someone who suffers from mental illness.

but i also don't want mentally ill people supporting legislation based on their unmedicated world views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
34. I've met Norma. On her best day, she's still white trash/redneck.
I always thought she made a rather iffy poster child for the (pro-choice) cause back in the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. me too
and I agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #34
44. Well you met her and sat there thinking 'white trash' a very racist thing
and vulgar as well. And you think she was happy to meet people thinking that? Racist terminology. Tell me, kestrel91916, what term do you use to describe similar trash people who are not white? Is there a pet name you have for such people? Is it a different one for each ethnic type of 'trash'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #44
50. White trash - though not a nice term, is only a term.
The people I run into who dislike it the most seem to have a lot vested in being "white".

Do you go after all racial slurs or is that the one that really gets you?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tanuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. I beg to differ. I am originally from West Virginia, and I have been on the receiving end of this
"only a term" for no other reason than my family's geographical origin. I don't think that being Appalachian makes me trash, and I don't appreciate the suggestion that being offended by a gratuitous insult means I "have a lot vested in being white." I suggest that you rethink this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #50
57. Your implication is most vile and based on nothing at all.
The term is not 'just a term'. It is a race based, classist label originated against poor people by rich fellow whites to mock them as lesser. Feel free to use it if you are comfortable with it. It is not my style to assign labels to people based on the color of their skin or their economic status. It is a term that wounded my mother in her childhood, so I am not fond of it. You are of course free to use whatever language you wish, knowing that others might judge it differently than you do. It is a risk worth taking for such a great phrase, I'm sure!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #57
64. Tom Tancredo, is that you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #44
51. You assume a bit much yourself
How do you know what kestrel91916 was thinking before meeting this lady? Maybe the impression kestrel91916 got was after seeing and listening to what she might have said.

Before you start attacking maybe you could ask?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #44
67. Well, I am white so I reserve the right to call white trash as I see it.
I have been known to refer to LA's black gangs and criminals as "black trash". Does that upset you? And Hispanic trash gets referred to as "Hispanic trash". Same for the local "Persian trash", who are unique in being rather wealthy, but still engaging in trashy behavior. Generally some pretty egregious or ignorant behavior is required to inflame me into using those terms, BTW.

I love the First Amendment, don't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasquatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #34
48. I guess you're bigoted too
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MellowDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #48
59. Yep, just like you...
They always out themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #48
68. Yep. Extraordinarily bigoted against ANY trashy behavior, regardless
of the source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MellowDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #34
58. There just was a hue and cry
about Freepers calling Malia Obama "ghetto trash".

So is ghetto trash wrong to use, but white trash A-OK?

You do progressives everywhere a disservice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #58
69. Malia isn't from a ghetto AND doesn't engage in trashy behavior,
so calling her that is just LOW.

If a white person engages in trashy behavior, I call it as I see it. BTW, I'm white.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MellowDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #69
71. So what?
What if Malia did engage in trashy behavior and was from the ghetto? The whole point of bigoted terms is that they stigmatize a group. Ghetto trash usually means urban, poor, and black. White trash usually means rural, poor, and of course white. Both these groups have been steryotyped and stigmatized and both of these terms have incredibly negative connotations.

Do you really think a progressive should use such terms? Don't you think it might be a wee bit hypocritical to criticize such language on the one hand and then use it ourselves on the other?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mamaleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I pity them as much as I pity the
poor folks in places like Philly that have to live with racist rednecks too.

Yeah sorry to burst your bubble, the South does not have the market on morons.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasquatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. No they don't, they just dominate the market.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mamaleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Or perhaps those living in the more "enlightened" areas
are a bit more stealth about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasquatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Well racism here is like anti-semitism in europe
The South is like our Germany.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. The South is like our Germany.
Jesus!

Yeah they love Jews everywhere but Germany! The Swiss and the Dutch just LOVE 'EM! So do Austrians and Russians! Not to mention Italy where the term "Ghetto" comes from... from when they made Jews live in designated areas...ghettos.

This localizing of bigotry that you do based on some stereotype you read about is akin to racism, y'know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. they just dominate the market.
No they don't. Go West, young man.....

Again I remind you...

Red states not in the South (using 2008 election results)
ID, MT, ND, SD, WY, NE, UT, AZ, KS, OK, MO, WV, AK.... a grand total of 13 states (not in the confederacy)

And red states down South
TX (not really a southern state....cowboys & Longhorns are not a Southern thing y'know. That's the West. But...)LA, MS, AL, GA, SC, TN, KY.... totaling 8

The West is most definitely the new seat of dumb ass rednecks. No doubt about it. Yes it USED to be the South, but not any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blandocyte Donating Member (830 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
36. Prejudice is prejudging
and you say you have a preponderance of evidence about Southerners. That's what all the righwing bigots say when they are making prejudiced remarks about their vicitms, too. We could all do without it. Please just fukkin stop it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasquatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #36
49. Actually I'm making a judgement call based on the information at hand and observations
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #49
60. Actually I'm making a judgement call based on the information at hand and observations
and your obvious hatred of the South.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Shouldn't these wingnuts protest "Jane Roe" instead?
She kind of set the ball in motion here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
43. Naw. She's repentant. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Rotating public...
I was wondering why so many people were filing out while Sen. Franken was speaking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Here's a photo of Norma McCorvey being baptised by an anti-choice preacher:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mamaleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. So she turned on the people who helped her
When did she convert to the anti-choice camp? Was it recent or in the 80s?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Wiki says 1994 at book signing.
They probably discussed market potential. She was probably not making a killing of the liberal crowd, so a conversion made her a viable author for the idiots
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mamaleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. She seems to be a tad confused.
And I think she only reversed the rape charge because it would play better to the anti-choicers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
45. Read the comments about her on this thread
and tell me again who turned on who. She's trash, white trash, a red neck. On her best day, she's trash. This from people who say they met her for the cause.
No wonder Norma crossed over. No wonder. Who'd want to spend time with people who were lined up to meet you, but thinking 'she's white trash'? Would you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. Jane Roe is a fucking asshole, to put it bluntly
I hate fucking self-righteous asshole hypocrites with every fiber of my being.
The asshole gained the right to an abortion, which presumably she desperately wanted enough to go all the way to the Supreme Court, and now she wants to deny that right to others.
May she have a pain-filled life and be eternally unhappy. What a fucking moron and shithead :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Yeah, it reeks of hypocrisy. But geesh....the tone and language of your comment is over the top. n
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deadric Damodred Donating Member (365 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. Sooner or later the Republicans are going to pick up...
...on the message that is being sent out. We constantly call Republicans hypocrites because they are constantly doing things that go against their moral values party line. However, we tend to forget that people are human and we try to make it so that if someone runs on moral values, that they must be as perfect as Jesus Christ. And yet, when a Democrat screws up, like cheats on his wife, nobody says anything because moral values are not in our party line. Sooner or later the GOP is going to figure that out, and while still going after gay and abortion, they'll take all mention of moral values or traditional values out of their party lines and speeches, that way they'll have the same "lisence to do what ever they hell you want" card that the Democrats have. After all, if you don't run on moral values, you can be as immoral as you want to be and nobody can say shit... and that's the exact message we're putting out everytime we call them a hypocrite when they screw up and everytime we ignore it when one of ours screw up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
GinaMaria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #25
66. It's not just about a platform of family values
it's about legislating 'family values'. IOW, creating laws, policies, etc that condemn certain behaviors while engaging in the behaviors you are busy trying to prevent others from doing. It seems to be a sickness. Instead of deciding what can or cannot go on in my bedroom, they need to only be concerned about what's going on in theirs. If you get on your high horse and condemn Clinton for an affair, you better make sure you haven't had one. You always have the option to keep your mouth shut. Sometimes it's best not to say anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
twitomy Donating Member (756 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Actually, McCorvey never had the abortion..
because the court case took too long. She gave her up for adoption...so technically not a "hypocrite" due to the circumstance..

BTW she is now Catholic...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
37. +1 (She is a mentally ill opportunist)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #37
54. Where are you getting the 'mentally ill' bit?
Or is that just the standard DU "mental illness is intrinsically Republican" meme?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. True..."emotionally unstable" would be more accurate...
and there is no doubt about the "opportunist" part
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
16. The anti-choice forces are just going to have to get over it
We worked harder, and we got our guy in. If he gets two court picks, then women will have the right to choose more or less guaranteed for the next two generations, and their movement will wither. They're going to fight like hell now, but they've already lost. Everyone has moved on. They may get a revival in 30 years or so, but it's unlikely. Capitalism needs dual income households to survive, and that trumps everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
twitomy Donating Member (756 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Sotomayor is Catholic..
I wouldnt take her being pro-choice as a given.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Please
Don't be silly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. There are many, many pro-choice Catholics. Kennedy and Kerry to name a few.
Some people believe in the separation of church and state and practice the concept of not having to impose their own personal religous beliefs on others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #20
41. uh, so is Pat Leahy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #20
63. Educated Catholics are overwhelmingly pro-choice.
I would say that she is pretty educated.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downtown Hound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
18. Sorry Jane, but if you want to outlaw abortion now
Then I fully expect you to be willing to serve prison time for the "murder" of your unborn child. There's no statute of limitations on murder, so why should you get a free pass when you are willing to condemn other women to either jail or possible death from illegal abortions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seeking Serenity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. "Jane Roe" never had the abortion.
So no "murder" charge would be forthcoming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichaelHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
22. you mean
Jane "I had mine, didn't like it so you can't have one" Roe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mamaleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. I thought that too, but she never had the chance to.
Her case began in 1970. The final decision came in 73. She did give birth, but she still could be called "Jane-I-Wanted-Mine-But-You-Can't-Roe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
24. Wouldn't you love....
to get a huge group of women to go to her next public appearance and one by one go up to her and thank her for making it possible that they have a choice?

Shaking her hand..."Thank you, thank you so much for giving me a choice!"


Let her stew in her Catholic Guilt!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. Can one experience "Catholic guilt" without being Catholic.....because
as evidenced upthread, it doesn't appear that she is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. as evidenced upthread, it doesn't appear that she is.


really?

From post # 19:


"BTW she is now Catholic..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. Yeah, really.
Look at comment #7.

Pictures speak a thousand words.

And maybe it's just me, but I don't think Catholic priests are in the habit of baptizing people in swimming pools. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
twitomy Donating Member (756 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #38
61. Try not to strain yourself in following this logic...
Edited on Mon Jul-13-09 07:48 PM by twitomy
She initially was a fundie (hence that picture) but eventually became catholic...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
35. These people need to get it through their thick skulls:
ABORTION WILL NEVER GO AWAY. NEVER. No matter how many dead fetuses they display or how crazy they get. IT WILL NEVER GO AWAY. They need to sit down and shut the fuck up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
40. "Lake of Fire" Abortion movement documentary that 'Jane Roe' is in
She explains in the documentary that she started having second thoughts on abortions because of the late term abortion issue. She was working in a clinic, assisting women to get abortions when she started having second thoughts. Then the dude in the picture baptizing her, his name is Flip if I recall, moved in next to her and her roommate. He then approached her and told her he hoped she was happy being responsible for the deaths of millions of babies.

As far as her "abortion" goes, again, according to her in this documentary, she was approached by the two lawyers that fought the case. It wasn't like she set-out to get an abortion and then hooked up with some lawyers to fight, she took the opportunity and in my opinion, did it because she was a fame-seeking individual, which is why she is now in the anti-choice camp...she's getting much more attention there than she was in the pro-choice camp.

Anyway, Lake of Fire... if you are at all interested in what the extreme right is doing on this front, you should rent it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tanuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
42. The NY Times ran this piece on McCorvey's defection to the anti-choice camp several years ago.
She evidently felt snubbed and pushed to the side by pro-choice advocates, while the Operation Rescue folks actively courted her and made her feel welcome. She seems to be someone who is easily manipulated and she has had a difficult life with some tough breaks early on. Anyway, the article is interesting:
http://www.nytimes.com/1995/08/12/us/new-twist-for-a-landmark-case-roe-v-wade-becomes-roe-v-roe.html?pagewanted=2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. I can believe it. I met her shortly before she flipped out.
There was a big rally at the Louisiana state capitol. Afterwards, there we were, just the two of us, outside on the steps. No one else was even around her, let alone asking for her autograph or anything. A few years after that, the anti's put the bite on her. :(

the Operation Rescue folks actively courted her and made her feel welcome.

That's pretty much their M.O. with everyone. In fact, that's pretty much every cult's M.O. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #42
53. I'd read that back then. That was my impression too...
The lawyers (Weddington and Coffee) were catapulted to prominence while she was left with the continuing hardships of being poor, not-highly-educated single woman in the 70's: crap jobs, trouble making ends meet, and plenty of sexism.

Maybe Weddington and Coffee did expoit her, maybe McCorvey came to feel that they did because she wasn't seeing any benefit from having been "Jane Roe". Certainly she felt snubbed.

So on the one hand you have someone discontented an possibly easily manipulated. On the other hand you have... Fundies leaping into that other hand because they recognize a PR coup when they see one. (Look to Bill Murray, Madeline Murray O'Hair's son for another example of Fundy counting-coup-conversion.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
47. Emotionally unstable OPPORTUNIST
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MetaTrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
56. I guess I've missed all the major news coverage of veterans being arrested at peace protests
Typical MSM pandering to the crackpot minority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
62. she must have discovered that "doing the right thing" wasn't paying the bucks that
selling your soul draws ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #62
65. Strange that Randall Terry is still walking...
around free so that he can organize scenes like this. Sort of surprised that Fred Phelps wasn't there as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #62
70. No kidding. I wonder how much she got for this gig. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC