Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Goldman Sachs execs sold $700 mn of stock: Report

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 09:47 PM
Original message
Goldman Sachs execs sold $700 mn of stock: Report
Source: Economic Times India

14 Jul 2009, 0644 hrs IST, AGENCIES

LONDON: Executives at US banking giant Goldman Sachs sold almost 700 million dollars worth of stock after Lehman Brothers collapsed in September, the Financial Times reported on Tuesday.

Most of the sales, worth 431 million pounds or 500 million euros, occurred when the firm enjoyed the support of 10 billion dollars in US government capital injections, the London-based newspaper said.

The FT based its report on compilings the newspaper had made of filings by banking executives with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

The surge in selling among Goldman partners, at a time when the US Treasury had thrown Wall Street a lifeline through its asset relief programme, is likely to spark criticism from lawmakers in Washington, the FT said.


Read more: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/4774670.cms
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. WOW. Did they also buy the stock?
that whole game is rigged.

On a serious note; who was buying Goldman stock?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 04:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Probably anyone who looked at the current crop of crooks in the
"new" administration grabbed some, knowing that GS wouldn't be allowed to fail.

Just like all the reports of freepers buying up all the ammunition and repeatedly emptying the shelves cause Obama was going to take their guns - of course bullet manufacturers report record profits the next quarter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NBachers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. "likely to spark criticism from lawmakers in Washington"
Yeah, becaues the "lawmakers in Washington" want their cut of the profits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. When will ANYONE do something about this Bloated, Behometh...taking Tax Payer Dollars
Edited on Mon Jul-13-09 10:14 PM by KoKo
raiding our 401-K's and treasury...and filling the Obama Administration with Crooks & Liars and Thieves...

How much more needs to be put out about GS before SOME Regulatory Agency pulls the plug on them.

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. q1-never,q2 doesnt matter there's a reason its called government sacks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. and who said those boyz aren't smart?
smartest fella's in the room :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. As Far as Being Smart Goes,
It actually looks like they panicked and lost money.

The day after Lehman failed, GS opened at $106 and closed at $108. Today it opened at $151.

There's nothing in principle wrong with an insider selling a position -- you just aren't allowed to use insider information. You could presume that Lehman executives should have better iformation about their company's prospects than the average investor and should be able to use that money. But in this case they didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. It sounds like they were hedging
Edited on Tue Jul-14-09 09:00 AM by ShamelessHussy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. They Might Have Been Cutting Their Risk
but it's an awful lot of money for just hedging. Sounds more like a panicked flight into cash, which didn't require any inside information.

Of course, they might have bought their stock back at a lower price a couple months later, but there are no corresponding stories about hundreds of millions of dollars of insider buying.

This is one of the few stocks I've actually followed over the last year. Was looking for a financial company that was unlikely to go bankrupt and bought a little GS at about $107. Wasn't exactly the best timing, but holding paid off in this case.

What's interesting now is this whole program trading thing. Have no idea what they were doing or whether it was legal, but it certainly made a fortune since March. Of course, pretty much anyone who got into the market in March has made a fortune.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Insider Trading. Jail time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IrishBuckeye Donating Member (336 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 04:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Haha, the SEC won't mess with their own kind
I use to think the SEC was just toothless and ballness. I know know that isn't the case, they just don't dare pick on the big players of this fixed game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galileoreloaded Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. The SEC is very important.........
who do you think runs interference for GS? Someone has to take out the competition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
7. Can we hang them now?
Nobody ever gets hanged anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
10. Both the bailout and the stimulus were poor-structured. The federal government
should have put more conditions on both and taken more of the upside on the bailout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
willing dwarf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 05:13 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. I'd say you're too kind
The government and regulators both here, in England and around the globe is rife with former Goldman Sachs employees who seem to be operatives on behalf of their former employer. I suppose they own a lot of GS stock and have made sure it remained secure.

I'd love to see them fall...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
11. I wonder how many of the sales were for meeting margin calls!
It was so ugly at that time that many sales were forced. Others just wanted out after lehman failed - very understandable, but they are probably pissed for selling at the lows!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 05:16 AM
Response to Original message
13. A group worthy of a billion dollar taxpayer funded bailout.
They must have been struggling to survive with such miserably un-diversified portfolios.

The bank declined to comment on the FT report other than to say that its partners receive a big share of their annual bonuses in stock, and that for many, stock sales represent an effort to diversify their holdings.


The shame of it all. It must have been hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
14. I've got a plan
Edited on Tue Jul-14-09 05:29 AM by snot
Adopt a rule that says employees of a publicly-traded company (i.e., a company that you or I might be invested in) may not buy or sell shares of their company's stock, EXCEPT

They may receive stock or stock options; but those MAY NOT be back-dated, forward-dated or otherwise modified after the fact; and

They may not SELL ANY shares until the first to occur of either: the expiration of ten years after ther termination their employment with the company (whether as an employee, consultant, subcontractor or otherwise) OR they're dead (from means other than suicide).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alcibiades Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
16. there's little here
Hate to say it, but there's little suspicious here, assuming these sales were of stocks they got as compensation.

Though if Martha Stewart can go down for less....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
19. Move along people, nothing to see here.



:argh:


This better not be another mess that will be swept under the rug!


:nuke:


Recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
22. The question no longer seems to be "Are they cheating?". It's more like "Does anybody care?"
Edited on Tue Jul-14-09 10:33 AM by redqueen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC