Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anti-Obama GI's Afghan Orders Revoked

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 10:56 AM
Original message
Anti-Obama GI's Afghan Orders Revoked
Source: military.com

The attorney representing an Army major fighting deployment to Afghanistan because he believes Barack Obama is not legally his commander-in-chief is declaring victory after the Soldier's orders were revoked yesterday.

California lawyer Orly Taitz says any service member may now refuse any order by questioning Obama's legitimacy.

"Do you know what this means?" Taitz asked in a telephone interview with Military.com Tuesday, about an hour after hearing from Maj. Stefan Cook, the officer fighting his deployment to Afghanistan. "It means the Obama administration has blinked. They have no cards to play with. The moment I filed a lawsuit, they didn't even fight!"

"Can you imagine what are the consequences? This is disastrous" for the administration, she said. "We'll have no military. Because anytime any Soldier, any Sailor, any Airman does not want to follow any orders, all he has to do is call an attorney and say 'I don't want to follow this order because I question the legitimacy of the commander in chief.' "

U.S. Army Maj. Stefan Frederick Cook, the reserve soldier who says he shouldn't have to go to Afghanistan because he believes Barack Obama was never eligible to be president, has had his deployment orders revoked, Army officials said.

Read more: http://www.military.com/news/article/anti-obama-gis-afghan-orders-revoked.html?col=1186032310810
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. That woman reads like a bad novel. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. Olbermann still annoys me, but he's good now and then.
Recalling his own determination in the 1960s that, if drafted, he would oppose it because he didn't want to get shot and killed, he said: "too bad Maj. Cook doesn't have the guts to say that. Then he might be deserving of his rank rather than an embarrassment to all those who served without cowardice."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. Not quite.
Given that an officer the rank of Major has the ability to get lots of people killed, he has proven himself unfit to serve.

Should an officer who comes to the same conclusion be allowed to serve? I think not. What other fucked up ideas is he going to come up with?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. When is this traitor's court martial? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. What does this really mean? I would suspect that the Army has discovered that Maj. Cook isn't
really the type of person that want in charge of anybody else.

" The paper said Cook, as an Individual Mobilization Augmentee, had volunteered for a year's deployment to Afghanistan on May 8 and his orders were issued June 9. Quon told the paper that IMAs who volunteer may ask for a revocation up until their reporting date, but that Cook had not asked for this. Quon also told the paper she could not say why the Army had revoked his orders, citing the Privacy Act."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. So he volunteers in May, but now has an issue with Obama's legitimacy?
yeah, right. What a dickhead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatGund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Oh, it's more than that.
http://badfiction.typepad.com/badfiction/2009/07/smell-of-rat-laced-with-skunk.html

In a nutshell,

1 Feb - Cook signed on as a plaintiff for Dr. Orly
25 March - Cook comments on Free Republic that he's a plaintiff
9 May - Cook volunteers to be deployed. As a volunteer, he can change his mind up to 24 hours before deployment
9 June - Cook gets orders to be deployed on 15 July
10 July - Dr. Orly files a lawsuit to get a TRO, trial date is 16 July
14 July - Cook's orders to deploy are revoked.

This is such a setup by Dr. Orly and Cook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. I don't understand - isn't this woman openly encouraging
insurrection? Or treason?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I would say yes. Yes, she is. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushmeister0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Can you say "mutiny"?
Edited on Wed Jul-15-09 11:34 AM by bushmeister0
"Taitz claims she has 170 service members who have joined her legal battle against Obama."

It walks likes mutiny, it talks like mutiny . . .

I wonder what would have happened if a service member had said he didn't want to fight in Iraq because George Bush was never really elected? How do you think that would have gone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. That's why I don't understand why these "Army officials" aren't
making it clear that this is an isolated case. I realize they can't divulge why his orders were revoked, but this article gives the impression that any service member can refuse deployment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. Filing an action in the courts is not mutiny. For mutiny, you need
to take illegal actions. According to Article 94 of the UCMJ, you have to commit the following:

"...with intent to usurp or override lawful military authority, refuse, in concert with any other person, to obey orders or otherwise do his duty or creates any violence or disturbance is guilty of mutiny;"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
9. Is this the end of the story? Or does it end with Maj Cook being
Edited on Wed Jul-15-09 11:35 AM by RaleighNCDUer
summarily dismissed from the service?

As he should be.

Edit: for spelling the name right - I've had fumble fingers all day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
47of74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #9
18. Well, it got him canned from his civilian job
Keith mentioned it tonight and I just found it on Daily Kos that this idiot managed to get himself canned from his civilian job as a systems engineer at the Department of Defense.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/7/15/753824/-My!-That-was-fast!-(Maj.-Birther-fired-from-civvy-job)

Simtech, Inc - who Cook worked for - was informed shortly after the DoD vacated Cook's orders that they didn't want him on DoD property anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
12. Deployment halted so charges can be brought.
That's my guess. We'll see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. Once they cancel deployment
They kind of lose the issue of refusing to deploy.

I imagine their will be a courts martial but it does seem odd they canceled his orders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. I agree with the poster who speculated that deployment has been
deferred as a Court Martial is being prepped!

Army JAG is burning the midnight oil to put together a case to fry this Cook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
auburngrad82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
14. I think he should be deployed to Leavenworth. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. Right-wingers think this is a "victory."
They will see that it is no such thing. I'm surprised they don't realize it already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasi2006 Donating Member (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. They love cowards like Rush, Hannity, and Cheney nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
17. Orly,Orly
please produce your birth certificate,your law degree,your dental degree,or shutup,Oh by the way I agree with one of the female posters,that stated that you look"like you had been ridden hard and left wet".You aRE TRULY A SKANK in the Colter mode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
20. olbermann said cook is a systems engineer for a Pentagon contractor
the army, being sued by this guy, said he wasn't welcome at department of defense facilities--which is where cook was working. "not anymore."

what a moran!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehBxUhPvNtI
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
23. How do we KNOW.....
...that this Orly Taitz person is a legit American??? ORLY? sounds French! :rofl: Hey!!! But for realz, where's her birth certificate???

- Someone should checked into that. Maybe if the FBI isn't doing anything.....

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC