Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Five Republican judges (From Alabama) switch to Democratic Party

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 09:06 PM
Original message
Five Republican judges (From Alabama) switch to Democratic Party
Edited on Fri Jul-17-09 09:07 PM by kpete
Source: Birmingham News

Five Republican judges switch to Democratic Party, including four from Jefferson County
Posted by Associated Press July 17, 2009 5:05 PM

MONTGOMERY -- Five Republican judges in Alabama have switched to the Democratic Party.

The executive committee of the Alabama Democratic Party voted Friday in Montgomery to accept four Jefferson County judges and one Montgomery County judge into the party so they can run as Democrats in 2010.

The Jefferson County party switchers are Circuit Judges Dan King and Virginia Vinson and District Judges Eric Fancher and Sheldon Watkins. The party switcher from Montgomery County is Circuit Judge William Shashy.

The executive board also voted to accept former Republican state Rep. Johnny Ford of Tuskegee into the party. That will allow Ford to run for a state Senate seat next year as a Democrat.


Read more: http://blog.al.com/spotnews/2009/07/five_republican_judges_switch.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Dem pool is dirty enough without adding more faux dems to it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Are they really false?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. They were GOP. How many leopards change their spots? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katanalori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. I see quite a few leopards changing their spots lately....
meaning former Republicans who just CANNOT tolrate what their party has become. My hubby is one. Finally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. No, I don't mean real people. I mean pols running for office. These judges
are changing so they can run for office. They can't get elected as Repubs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. You really think in Alabama where Obama only won 10% of the white vote
that these judges are switching party's because they feel they have a better chance at getting re-elected?

Just asking...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevepol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #23
40. How do you know it was only 10%? AL is all black box voting, no paper, no audits
as far as I know. Same is true of GA of course and TX is almost 100% unauditable too I think.

Unless the vote is auditable and recountable, it's impossible to have a democracy, much less know how many voted for any candidate. Siegelman won the governorship but was denied the office by a switch at the last minute of the programming of the black boxes.

AL is worse than a banana republic, probably the least democratic state in the union.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tanuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #40
46. The 10% figure comes from exit polling
There is an interesting interactive map in the article below:
http://www.nola.com/news/index.ssf/2008/11/obama_made_inroads_with_white.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #23
62. Why are you citing only the white vote?
Edited on Sun Jul-19-09 10:12 AM by No Elephants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MUAD_DIB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #18
42. They're hitching a ride on the Specter Express.

You're right. Do the Democrats really needs them? Would these judges be inclined to switch back to their original party if the Democrats didn't have the majority?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rrneck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #18
44. The first rule of politics
is find a group of people that are headed somewhere and get out in front of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #15
37. Yes - seems like an organized effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #12
26. that is true for politicians but not necessarily true about judges

My brother is a conservative Republican and was a long time prosecutor before becoming a judge.


He serves in a very small rural area. The new prosecutor is lazy and not very professional.


My brother throws out a high number of cases because the prosecutor doesn't meet the standard of proof.


Many people in his area think that he is a Democrat, and during the last election almost all of his volunteers were Dems.


He lost the election for a higher court because the people thought he was a liberal, he just followed the law.


Ironically they thought he was an activist judge! lol, but he is not he is actually quite conservative politically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Native Donating Member (885 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #26
35. I beg to differ - in our area judges are elected - I personally know
several judges who have changed party affiliations (and more than once) for one reason only - to increase their chances of getting elected. They consider it SOP. I know one particular registered Republican (a bleeding heart liberal - also an atheist) that was appointed by our previous Republican governor. Is this judge a true Republican? Of course not. Will this judge change party affiliation when election time comes around? I'd bet good money on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #35
54. I am guessing that you are in the Eastern part of the US


In the West there is much less commitment to party identification.


Judges in most Western states run without any party identification and party has a lot less impact on municipal and non partisan elections than it has in the East.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #12
49. I know a lot of good people who are Republicans, many of them voted for Obama.
But please, continue with your bigotry, assuming all Republicans are Rush-bot lunatics. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. The Democratic Party is a coalition, not a regiment.
That's part of the reason we're not the GOP.

And if the Democratic Party were to rid itself of everyone you consider to the to the right of yourself, I suspect it could never elect a dog catcher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. The Democratic is soooooo centrist now. It used to be liberal. That's what I remember.
Too many centrists peeing in the pool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #13
64. Was it ever liberal in Alabama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. The Republican party is beoming the party of wing nuts
and, with the number of Republicans moving to the Democratic party, it's becoming the defacto GOP. Actual Democrats are going to have to find somewhere else to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scubadude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. Add to that the fact that the Repubs have moved the entire...
country to the right, through a 40+ year media/Big business blitz that has literally made "Liberal" into a bad word.

In part they succeeded. The center now is to the right of where it used to be. Hopefully in my mind we will move it leftward once more, where it should be.

Scuba
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #24
43. Totally agree...
I keep hoping. I'd like to see a true liberal some time. Far, far too few of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #24
53. Great point
It's amazing that center-left like Obama is considered liberal by the media. "Moderate Dems" are in some cases really center-right. If we get Obama's health care plan passed plus card-check eventually, then we can say we are starting to move the "center" back to where it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikekohr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #20
34. The Democratic Party Is the Progressive, the Centrist and the Right of Center Party
The Republican Party has staked out and controls the lunatic fringe of the radical right. Remember the 80/20 concept: "80% of our problems are caused by 20% of the people." Republicans account for 21% of the electorate.

mike kohr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #20
60. I fear you are correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. Flame bait. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkyDaddy7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #6
33. What amazes me...
Everyone here on DU mocks the GOP for their hard-line views and not allowing diverse political views in their party and yet many here on DU are calling for the same thing within the our party? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #33
50. Black-and-White thinking.
To them it's always good if we do it even though that same thing caused the GOP to degenerate into a gang of racists and fascists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #6
41. "The Democratic Party is a coalition, not a regiment." Nicely said, I'll remember that line.
Too many have a rigid and unyielding definition of who they consider to be a real Democrat. Yes, there are those who believe that anyone to the right of them cannot possibly be a Democrat.

As a Democrat I am proud to be a part of a Democratic coalition and I don't demand that others believe exactly as I do in order for me to consider them to be a Democrat. Yes, let's leave being a regiment to the Republicans who like loyal tin soldiers obediently vote en masse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
48. So you want us to become a party of rabid ideologues like the GOP?
That is doing the GOP good. NOT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. WTF. We don't need any more rightwingers in the party. really. We do NOT.
join the party fine. Join to run, NOT FINE with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Excellent.
Surprising that judges would make a big play of changing parties and I am sure there is a real interesting back story to this ... but the tent is big enough for everyone. Come on in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. +2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. While I may not totally agree with the tent being enough for
everyone, the first thought that came to mind is wondering if they'd seen enough of the corruption relating to Don Seigelman that they're so disgusted that they want no part of it anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #10
32. my first thoughts too. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
57. It is terrible. They are switching parties not ideologies. They will squeeze out legitimate Democrat
s. This is the worst thing that can happen. I do not want them under my tent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. Pulling a Specter!
Edited on Fri Jul-17-09 09:31 PM by waiting for hope
Holding that finger in the wind and felt which way it was blowing .... asshats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scubadude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #9
25. Yeah, I can see the next big meme!
Pulling a Specter! LOL

Scuba
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalLovinLug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
52. Pulling a Specter indeed
They will still rule as ignorant rightwing bigots. They will still hold their same views on women's rights, gay marriage, and capital punishment. Its just that they will claim to be ONE OF US while they do it.

great. I can't wait to see how even more extreme the opposing Republican contenders will be.

Your choice. Dumb or Dumber.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. Most Southern cities are what we call "one horse" towns.
That means there's just one ruling clique of elites, and they stick together like glue. When it's socially preferable to call yourself a Democrat, that's what you do. When it's socially acceptable to call yourself a Republican, you do that instead. But they're all cut from the same cloth, and they all support their rich friends. They're inherently conservative, no matter what they call themselves.

Look at how many Southern politicians have changed party affiliation (Jesse Helms, Phil Gramm, Zell Miller ... and these are just a few that leap to mind). They're all servants of the elite clique that put them into office, and they always will be. It makes no difference what they call themselves.

All this tells me is that it's easier to get elected in Jefferson County (Birmingham) as a Democrat. So, the politicians switched parties. Don't believe for a second that their ideals or investments have changed.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dramarama Donating Member (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
14. Its been a generation
right LBJ? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boddingham Donating Member (80 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
16. Judges with political party affiliations are like . . .
Celebrities endorsing corporate products they know nothing about.

This sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #16
29. They might as well be up front about it.
Look at the SCOTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amos Moses Donating Member (551 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
17. Of course now they will be referred to as "activist judges".
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
19. are they ready to embrace the moral values of the left?
or is just a commodity to get re elected
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
22. I think that is their line of attack. To join the Dems but not be Dems. Everyone hates
the Republicans right now so why not say you are a Democrat but not be one. Besides, that gives more control to mess stuff up. I am sick of it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
27. I know nothing about four of them,
but Shashy has been a constant advocate of relief for inhuman overcrowding in Alabama
prisons, even fining the state for inhumane treatment of them. As that is likely to be
a risky stance in Alabama, I wonder if Shashy was not a Democrat all along who had to
wear Republican clothing for a while for political survival? And maybe not only Shashy?
For years, Alabama has been close to the one-party state that DeLay and Rove sought, to
the point where Rove negated Siegelman's re-election and had him tossed into solitary.

Maybe, just maybe, our tent in the south was bigger than we thought all along, and only
now are some people feeling secure enough to "come out."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
28. Geee...the aren't going to take the other route..."I'm a libetarian"
Seems like the repuke party is losing it's sheep by just about any means possible; even if it means going over to "the dark side".

This really has no significance. The southern democrats of yesterday are really the repukes of today. It's just a name...nothing more. They are still keeping their hoods and gowns pressed in the closet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tanuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #28
38. Somehow, I don't think State Rep. Johnny Ford of Tuskegee is "keeping his hood and gown...
Edited on Sat Jul-18-09 08:38 AM by Tanuki
...pressed in the closet." Ford, pictured below, was a Democrat for 30 years before switching to the Rethugs in 2003. He has now come to his senses, or maybe he is just an opportunist.

http://ts1.images.live.com/images/thumbnail.aspx?q=1078581668204&id=f0605161de8429ba190462bac93e1c11&url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.nmac.org%2fpix%2fBoard%2520Photos%2fjohnny%2520ford%2520(2).jpg



(edit for typo)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
30. Ha ha, another setback for the Party of Nope.
This has been a real bad coupla years to be a stupidass Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubledamerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
31. They must have forgot their Cheney anthrax lessons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
36. Why? So they can trash the place? I do not trust them. There has been
Edited on Sat Jul-18-09 08:19 AM by geckosfeet
so much of this shit going on lately that it seems like an organized effort to get inside and do some dirty work.

Keep the turncoats on a very short leash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
39. their intent is sabotage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #39
51. Prove it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
45. you know what this means , right? sex toys! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
47. All the intelligent Republicans are getting sick of the racist extremists.
Good for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
55. Obviously the handwriting is on the wall -- but who needs these Repugs??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
56. Waiting to hear Larisa's, and Scott Horton's, take on this.
Interesting development.

Canary in the coal mine moment? (Pun intended.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
58. It's a trap!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caseymoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
59. Gives me mixed feelings.

On the one hand, I love seeing the GOP ship sinking.

On the other hand, I hate taking on its escaping rats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
61. I'm not sure this is a good idea. Do we really need more DINOS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
63. From reading the comments, it seems 19 judges went from Dem to Pub in the 90's because
the state was becoming more Pub. So, judges switching parties seems to be SOP for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadEyeDyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
65. I think they just want to keep a job
My uncle ran for judge though he did not get elected. He ran as a republican because the opponent was a dem. He said party didn't really matter at that level. It was just a tag.

These judges were probably dems all along and just had to wait until the tides turned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC