Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Minority Turnout Was Critical to Obama's Election, Data Show

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 11:54 AM
Original message
Minority Turnout Was Critical to Obama's Election, Data Show
Source: WSJ

Census Bureau data released Monday show the extent to which strong minority-voter turnout in the 2008 election helped President Barack Obama win over swing states and make inroads into Republican strongholds.

About five million more people voted for president in November than four years earlier, with minorities accounting for almost the entire increase. About two million more black and Hispanic voters and 600,000 additional Asians went to the polls.

While the figures reflect a long-term demographic shift, they also attest to the success of the Democrats' extensive campaign to register their supporters and get them to the polls. Overall, the 64% turnout was unchanged from four years earlier.

The data also show an increase in turnout by young voters. Those between 18 and 24 had a 49% turnout rate, up from 47% in 2004 -- the only age group to see a statistically significant jump at the polls.

Read more: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124813588601666995.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, in a nutshell, it seems...
More Dems, including democratic minorities and young voters, came out than ever before AND more republicans stayed home. It is interesting the article states clearly the first part of my previous statement but leaves out the second part. They simply say this: "Overall, the 64% turnout was unchanged from four years earlier."


Oh, wait a minute, it's the WSJ....never mind.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I thought it was good compared to some of the other OPs on this subject.
Makes the situation clear, who it was that got Obama elected and why, and in the WSJ too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I have no argument re better than some...
it's just fascinating how the WSJ and other MSM outlets are very quick to point out the effect from only one side of the equation while ignoring the other side, that being that more republicans stayed home.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well, yeah, that's sort of why this one struck me.
It was so clear and balanced and to the point. Usually in the WSJ I expect smoke and mirrors and howling wind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Make7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Didn't Obama win by almost ten million votes? ( n/t )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lindisfarne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. I never understand these articles "minority turnout important". Well, of course it was. It was even
for McCain. An extra few % of votes in a few key states in a presidential election decides (almost) all presidential elections. For the same reason, the disabled vote was important as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. And, I thank "the minorites" for
being a hellava lot smarter than the whatevers who voted for the ugly mccain-palin ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yeah, McCain/Idiotwoman
would have won if all those young people, Black people and Hispanics would have just stayed home. :sarcasm: Like they don't really really count.

Here's a newsflash.

The world is run by people who show up. Good for us for showing up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sick_of_Rethuggery Donating Member (853 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. Kind of silly to think that 3 million more minorities
helped him win, when he actually won by close to 10 million votes -- all those extra minorities could have sat home and he would have still won by 6+ million votes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC