Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Former CIA Dir) Hayden: CIA assassination program 'would be valuable'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 11:22 AM
Original message
(Former CIA Dir) Hayden: CIA assassination program 'would be valuable'
Source: WTOP

WASHINGTON - The ability to kill dangerous terrorists through a CIA assassination program other than missile strikes would be of value to the United States, former CIA Director Michael Hayden tells WTOP.

"Without confirming or denying what the nature of the program is, the fact that three different directors over the course of seven years returned to the issue, I think you'd have to say, 'Yes, it was valuable,'" Hayden says.

As new details about the program emerge, there are still more questions than answers. One of those questions is whether Vice President Dick Cheney ordered the CIA to keep quiet about the program.

"I was never directed by the vice president, as some have alleged about this program, not to brief this or frankly anything else to Congress. If Congress feels that we should have told them more about this program, my only response would be that this program didn't meet a threshold for me to even brief inside the Executive Branch," Hayden says.

Read more: http://www.wtop.com/?sid=1752195&nid=778
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. Statements like that make the United States less safe
Valuable? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. 'Cause BushCo*, as a whole, did so much for national security.
I'd trade two Saddams and one Al Qaeda to have those eight years back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. So, he was killing people and not telling the White House?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. what.the.fuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. +1
:wtf:

:wtf:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. yeah, let me correct that. what i meant to say was:
:argh::argh::argh::argh:

:nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke:

:banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. what threshold was that? Autonomy or what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. I remember at the time this prick was confirmed by the Senate.............
.........all the press and Senate were saying how reasonable this motherfucker was. My belief is that "these" people from the Bush Administration should never work again in the US, period. Not at McDonalds, cleaning shitters, giving blowjobs, nada, nothing. What they should be is in fucking jail, but fat chance for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
7. Didn't Congress enact some law or another about the CIA and briefings to Congress?
Decisions by the CIA to murder folks doesn't fall within that law?

Sumpfin sounds mighty wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
9. The CIA division of the Bush Crime Family IS the world's largest terrorist organization
and the parent company of "Al Qaeda" (whatever "Al Qaeda" actually is. And it ain't what the Bush Crime Family and the whore media told you it is)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Without doubt. Bushco no more "governed" than did my Aunt Fanny. THEY LOOTED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
10. Was Hayden head if the CIA all eight years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
11. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. Cue the Mission Impossible Theme,,,,
Da da da da
da da da da
da da da da
da da da da
,,,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lsewpershad Donating Member (964 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
15. Hideous Hayden
is now telling us it is OK to murder in our name. What if a terrorist decide to murder Hayden I guess that would be OK as he would have a right to protect himself. If this ever happens would we invade the country from which the terrorist hails regardless of how many innocent people are killed in the process?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
16. Oh sure, no potential for mischief here
Shorter Hayden: "Nobody had to tell me to keep my yap shut to Congress; I knew I was breaking the law." And if some nosy parkers in Congress "feel" they should have been briefed, they can go suck a lemon for all Mr. Hayden cares - he wasn't even talking to people in the White House (who didn't evince a whole lot of curiosity about what was going on in our name with our tax dollars).

But hey, if you all don't mind paying the price for all this CIA clandestine skullduggery, why should we investigate any of this? YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH! And Mr. Hayden is here to tell you what truth the American people can and cannot handle. And if we sustain another terrorist attack due to these secret shenanigans, then we'll hare off for another round of military adventurism, which will be a great financial boon to our good friends in the defense industries. Isn't representative government a wonder?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
17. I want the list of names. Who did we kill. Who will we kill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piewhacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
18. Great Idea Hayden.! We'd sure have solved a lot of national security problems...
if some CIA operative had simply taken you out back
and shot you in 2002.

Would have been good for the nation,
and frankly.. just jake with me.
Hey.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
19. That puts Hayden in agreement with most dictators and terrorists.
They also think assassination programs are valuable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soryang Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
20. Mr. Dragnet Surveillance pops off again
As NSA director he initiated eavesdropping on all electronic communcations at ATT hubs but publicly demonstrated he didn't know the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. Probably gets his legal advice from David Addington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC