Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

California Legislature passes health reform, but the governor may not

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 09:49 AM
Original message
California Legislature passes health reform, but the governor may not
Source: LA Times

Legislature passes health reform, but the governor may not

Lawmakers vote to bar insurers from dropping sick patients, and approve several other bills. But Schwarzenegger says his pen is on hiatus until lawmakers act on water and prison issues.

By Patrick McGreevy and Eric Bailey

The California Legislature passed a measure Tuesday that would curtail the ability of insurance companies to cancel coverage for patients diagnosed with serious illnesses

The bill addresses a practice known as rescission, which was the subject of a series of articles in The Times exposing how several major healthcare companies, including Blue Cross and Health Net Inc., canceled medical coverage for sick policyholders.

The practice has since been the subject of probes by law enforcement agencies in California and sparked congressional hearings. Government officials say thousands of policyholders in California have had their coverage dropped.

"The insurance industry has made billions by unfairly canceling health policies, with little to no oversight before rescinding a patient's insurance coverage," said Assemblyman Hector De La Torre (D-South Gate), author of the measure, AB 2. He said the bill "protects consumers and will put an end to this shameful practice."

The proposal, pushed by the California Medical Assn. and other advocacy groups, would allow regulators to block the rescission of coverage unless they find that a patient intentionally lied to the company about preexisting conditions.

It also would clarify for consumers what information they must provide to insurance companies when they apply for coverage, and simplify the forms on which patients report the information. And it would require the companies to complete a check of a patient's health history before approving their coverage.

The measure, approved by both houses of the Legislature, will go to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger once the Assembly approves minor changes. But as lawmakers acted on the health insurance issue and dozens of other matters Tuesday, the governor vowed to stop signing bills until further notice.

<snip>


Read more: http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-legis9-2009sep09,0,6129243.story?track=rss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. What happens in California if the Gov doesn't sign? Pocket veto or passive acceptance?
I don't know, but I have the idea that in some states, if the governor doesn't sign within a particular time period, the law goes into effect anyway, but in others, it dies.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bette Noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. It will only become law without the Governor's signature if his term
expires in the meantime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. That's incorrect. CA Gov has to veto a bill or it becomes law. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Thanks! Does he have until January?
that's what it looked like from your post (I admit I didn't read the link).

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. No. Since it's the end of the first year of a two year session the Gov's got 30 days from
the Leg's adjournment to take action on enrolled bills that reach his desk. Based on the legislative calendar, Oct 11 would be his last day to veto the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. In CA bill becomes law if Gov does not veto.
Edited on Wed Sep-09-09 12:28 PM by Garbo 2004
"Governor
If both houses approve a bill, it goes to the Governor. The Governor has three choices: sign the bill into law, allow it to become law without his or her signature, or veto it. A governor's veto can be overridden by a two-thirds vote in both houses. Most enacted bills go into effect on the first day of January of the next year. Urgency bills, and certain other measures, take effect immediately after they are enacted into law." http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/guide.html#Appendix_A
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. Lame excuse, butthead...
I can't wait until he's gone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. No shit!
What an arrogant prick - wonder when his brain returns from hiatus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
W T F Donating Member (400 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. A 50 state stratagy would put a big strain on the lobbyist fighing health care reform
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. Easy to get around, just raise the rates until they can not be met
That way they do not ever have to cancel anyone's insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. Steroid Boy vetoed single payer twice
He's shown he's on the side of the insurance racketeers. I expect him to keep being their rent boy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. again, it's pitiable how many Dems here voted for him as a "new" kind of Republican
people really are that gullible...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I can't forgive Angelides and Westley for destroying each other
They tore each other apart and just let Arnold sit back and coast to another term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. Can we just impeach this weasel yet?
Resign or do your job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PHIMG Donating Member (814 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. CA will have single payer in a few years
They passed it before and Arnold killed it. There were so many reasons for that little coup in CALIFORNIA. Preventing Single Payer was a big reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC