President Obama to Set Higher Bar For Keeping State Secrets

[cal04]

Source: Washington Post

New Policy May Affect Wiretap, Torture Suits

The Obama administration will announce a new policy Wednesday making it much more difficult for the government to claim that it is protecting state secrets when it hides details of sensitive national security strategies such as rendition and warrantless eavesdropping, according to two senior Justice Department officials.

The new policy requires agencies, including the intelligence community and the military, to convince the attorney general and a team of Justice Department lawyers that the release of sensitive information would present significant harm to "national defense or foreign relations." In the past, the claim that state secrets were at risk could be invoked with the approval of one official and by meeting a lower standard of proof that disclosure would be harmful.

That claim was asserted dozens of times during the Bush administration, legal scholars said.

The shift could have a broad effect on many lawsuits, including those filed by alleged victims of torture and electronic surveillance. Authorities have frequently argued that judges should dismiss those cases at the outset to avoid the release of information that could compromise national security.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/22/AR2009092204295.html?hpid=topnews

---

Justice Dept. Plans to Limit Use of State Secrets Privilege
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/23/us/politics/23secrets.html?hp

[babylonsister]

1. Who wrote this? Not going there or trusting the wapo. nt

[BlooInBloo]

2. Guess we'll see tomorrow if it's true. Sounds like a good step, though.

[cal04]

3. here's the article from the NY Times

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/23/us/politics/23secrets.html?hp
Justice Dept. Plans to Limit Use of State Secrets Privilege

[DCKit]

4. And poor Dick Cheney stuck in bed after surgery can't tour the MSM deriding the Administration.

It's TORTURE!

[laughingliberal]

5. Heh, heh nt

[Torn_Scorned_Ignored]

6. Meaningful for some, I hope

HEY ACLU, interested now?

The shift could have a broad effect on many lawsuits, including those filed by alleged victims of torture and electronic surveillance. Authorities have frequently argued that judges should dismiss those cases at the outset to avoid the release of information that could compromise national security.

[Nuclear Unicorn]

7. Get ready to file those FOIA's, folks

[Overseas]

8. K&R. Glad to see this move toward more transparency. //nt

[No Elephants]

9. Sounds like a positive step. K & R

[Vidar]

10. It's a move in the right direction. Thank you, Obama.

[SpartanDem]

11. K&R

[Solly Mack]

12. K&R