Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House: Official ‘misspoke’ on Goldstone report

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 12:33 AM
Original message
White House: Official ‘misspoke’ on Goldstone report
Source: JTA

<snip>

"The White House says an official "misspoke" when he said the Obama administration would not allow the Goldstone report recommendations on Israel's conduct in the Gaza war to reach the International Criminal Court.

A top White House official told Jewish organizational leaders in an off-the-record phone call Wednesday that the U.S. strategy was to "quickly" bring the report -- commissioned by the U.N. Human Rights Council and carried out by former South African Judge Richard Goldstone -- to its "natural conclusion" within the Human Rights Council and not to allow it to go further, Jewish participants in the call told JTA.

Tommy Vietor, a White House spokesman, called JTA later to say the official "misspoke" and that administration policy on the Goldstone report remains as articulated last week by Susan Rice, the U.N. ambassador.

Rice described the UNHRC mandate as "unbalanced, one sided and basically unacceptable. We have very serious concerns about many of the recommendations in the report. We will expect and believe that the appropriate venue for this report to be considered is the Human Rights Council and that is our strong view."

She did not mention what the United States would do were the report to be referred to the ICC."

Read more: http://jta.org/news/article/2009/09/23/1008097/us-pledges-to-quash-goldstone



Related thread:

U.S. pledges to quash Goldstone recommendations

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=4073989&mesg_id=4073989
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Rahm, Is That You?
Bucking for Head Traitor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. Honestly, the version from the White House official who "misspoke" doesn't
sound too different from the bullshit official version.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. Is prompting a war a defense to war crimes charges?
I'm not aware of the they started it defense. I'm aware that the defense doesn't hold water when issued by children. So it should be a real no brainer when it comes to nations using it. Is there anything stopping a separate investigation of Palestine's war crimes against Israel? I think an equal protection of international law would be the better way to go. Now THAT I understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BunkerHill24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'm glad so I didn't comment on the first report ....
Now I await if this report will stick.....


K&R


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. A top White House official told Jewish organizational leaders in an off-the-record phone call...
Edited on Thu Sep-24-09 05:42 AM by shadowknows69
WTF kind of journalism is that? An off record comment shouldn't be used as an anonymous source. The news today has become nothing but a self-sustaining tabloid rumor mill. I was taught to have a named source 99% of the time and take as few "said on the condition of anonymity...", "source close to the..." et al. as possible. Extreme cases, like say, Watergate, "Deep Throat" is acceptable but should never be the whole basis of your news reporting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. Apparently, a lot of us have good bullshit sniffers. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC