Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bank of America, 3 Other Banks’ FDIC Fees May Top $10 Billion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 06:31 PM
Original message
Bank of America, 3 Other Banks’ FDIC Fees May Top $10 Billion
Source: Bloomberg


Sept. 29 (Bloomberg) -- The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.’s plan to bolster its reserves may cost Bank of America Corp. and three of the largest U.S. banks more than $10 billion.

Bank of America, the biggest U.S. lender by deposits, may owe $3.5 billion under the FDIC proposal for banks to prepay three years of premiums, based on the lowest assessment rate multiplied by the bank’s $900 billion in second-quarter U.S. deposits.

“This seems like a very hefty amount,” said Tim Yeager, a finance professor at the University of Arkansas and former economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. “The FDIC’s projections of future losses are pretty severe, and they are trying everything they can to avoid tapping the Treasury.”

U.S. bank premiums range from 12 cents per $100 in deposits for the safest lenders to 45 cents for banks the U.S. considers risky, said Chris Cole, senior regulatory counsel for the Independent Community Bankers of America. The FDIC proposed asking banks to pay premiums for the fourth quarter and next three years on Dec. 30. The fees will raise $45 billion.

The FDIC is required by law to rebuild the fund when the reserve ratio, or the balance divided by insured deposits, falls below 1.15 percent. It was 0.22 percent on June 30 and will sink to a deficit tomorrow. The fund, drained by 95 bank failures this year, had $10.4 billion at the end of the second quarter. The fund will erase its deficit by 2012, the FDIC said today.


Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aaZTaeysFJPY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. If it wasn't for taxpayers BofA would be in liquidation right now
They should be very grateful, and shut their mouths and pay their fees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sub Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. When I lived in San Diego, there was an uproar because B of A was actively pushing home loans
for those in the country without legal authorization.

Bank of 'America' my ass. Unless you're presuming that 'America' is going to be your piggy bank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. Originally, Bank of America helped immigrants and those hurt by the 1906 earthquake in San
Fransisco. Such good beginnings. And look at it now. Changes in our antitrust and banking laws enabled this.

Too bad we couldn't make the relevant lawmakers and lobbyists financially responsible for the bailout, eh?

Instead, we pay them to enable our getting screwn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Where it should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Many of the largest banks failed to pay anything to the FDIC for years
Zero

Nada

Zip

Its about time they stopped getting away with dodging their obligations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katkat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. DJ13
? I'm curious as to how banks have been avoiding paying the fees, can you explain what you mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Now-needy FDIC collected little in premiums
Globe Staff / March 11, 2009

With fund going strong, banks didn't pay for decade


WASHINGTON - The federal agency that insures bank deposits, which is asking for emergency powers to borrow up to $500 billion to take over failed banks, is facing a potential major shortfall in part because it collected no insurance premiums from most banks from 1996 to 2006.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, which insures deposits up to $250,000, tried for years to get congressional authority to collect the premiums in case of a looming crisis. But Congress believed that the fund was so well-capitalized - and that bank failures were so infrequent - that there was no need to collect the premiums for a decade, according to banking officials and analysts.

More....
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2009/03/11/now_needy_fdic_collected_little_in_premiums/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. In short, the FDIC is broke, and cannot afford to foreclose on broken banks.
If the oversight laws had been applied, and banks had been held accountable, this would not be an issue.
It is an issue now. I am amazed that people have not been taking their money out of the riskier banks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Po_d Mainiac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. U gotta be brain dead to do business with BofA-holes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. Now I know I have a heart . . . .
'cause it's breaking!



:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. As long as it does not
cut into executive bonuses, who gives a shit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
11. All I can say is it's about damn time!
Why go at the lowest assessment rate? Why not somewhere in the middle?

Why not ALWAYS collect the premiums? If the money accumulates, then let it collect interest. Let it work for us instead of the big banks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC