Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chilcot inquiry: US said Iraqis would welcome invasion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 03:16 PM
Original message
Chilcot inquiry: US said Iraqis would welcome invasion
Source: Guardian

British attempts to persuade the US to plan for the consequences of an invasion of Iraq foundered on a "blind spot" in Washington where senior officials thought "everyone would be grateful and there would be dancing in the streets", the Chilcot inquiry into the war was told today.

(snip)

It was assumed that all would be well, especially if power was handed to an exiled opposition spokesman such as Ahmed Chalabi. "We said they had very little credibility in Iraq," Chaplin told the inquiry.

It is known that Chalabi was feted by the neocons in Washington, including those in the Pentagon who took over the job of deciding how Iraq should be run after the invasion.

Senior figures in Whitehall said the failure to draw up a proper plan to protect the civilian population after Iraq was occupied was a prima facie breach of the Geneva conventions.

Today, Chaplin and Sir Peter Ricketts, then political director at the FCO, said they were dismayed by the way the Bush administration failed to take the issue seriously, despite personal appeals from Tony Blair to George Bush.

(end snip)





Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/dec/01/chilcot-inquiry-iraq-edward-chaplin



I dunno. I think the eventual caving of Tony Blair to Bushies makes him look evermore the poodle.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rumsferatu threatened to fire any of his planning staff that...
Mentioned planning for the occupation..

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2006_09/009469.php

"The secretary of defense continued to push on us ... that everything we write in our plan has to be the idea that we are going to go in, we're going to take out the regime, and then we're going to leave," Scheid said. "We won't stay."

Scheid said the planners continued to try "to write what was called Phase 4," or the piece of the plan that included post-invasion operations like occupation.

Even if the troops didn't stay, "at least we have to plan for it," Scheid said.

"I remember the secretary of defense saying that he would fire the next person that said that," Scheid said. "We would not do planning for Phase 4 operations, which would require all those additional troops that people talk about today.

"He said we will not do that because the American public will not back us if they think we are going over there for a long war."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hearts and minds...
two things missing from the bush admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedSock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. it went off as planned
these guys are far from incompetent. most of what has happened was part of the plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apnu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. I remember this talk during the run up.
It was one of the justifications for the war. Every right-wing pigeon was spouting this after the yellow cake from Nigeria bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh, sure, anybody would support having their country bombed
into smithereens. What a clueless asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. They heard what they wanted to hear
They had people like Chalabi telling them how wonderful it was all going to be and they simply believed it without question.

Most of us have probably had bosses at some point who would only listen to view points that backed their existing opinions, it is a similar situation except these guys had the power to ruin whole nations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC