Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Governor says no more Arkansas parolees

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
The Northerner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 04:05 PM
Original message
Governor says no more Arkansas parolees
Source: KING 5 TV

SEATTLE - A major announcement comes from Washington Gov. Christine Gregoire in the bitter clash between Arkansas and the state of Washington over the handling of the Maurice Clemmons case.

Gregoire anounced beginning today, Washington state will no longer accept convicted criminals on parole from the state of Arkansas.

Gregoire says she is extremely troubled by emails that surfaced Tuesday. The emails showed Arkansas officials didn't want to keep a warrant in effect which would have kept Clemmons in Pierce County Jail. The emails also showed how desperately officials in Washington – prosecutors, a sheriff’s deputy, the Attorney General’s Office and the Department of Corrections – were trying to get Arkansas to work with them to keep Clemmons in jail, but it appears Arkansas wasn’t willing to help.

“I am so troubled that today I've asked (DOC Secretary Eldon Vail) to discontinue, under interstate compact, accepting any individuals from Arkansas until we can have a further review of not only the interstate compact system and whether it's really living up to its responsibilities, but whether Arkansas is living up to its responsibilities and I have a major questions in my head about that," said Gregoire. "And until I am confident they are, I've asked the secretary not to accept any interstate compact (inmates) from Arkansas.”

Read more: http://www.king5.com/news/Governor-says-no-more-Arkansas-prisoners-78341957.html



Let's see who'll be faulted first in the upcoming blame game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why were we doing it in the first place?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flaneur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. There's something called the Interstate Compact...
...that allows people paroled in one state to serve their parole in another.

Why do we do it? Say you live in New Jersey, but get busted and go to prison in Nebraska. You get out on parole. You have no reason to stay in Nebraska and Nebraska had no reason to want you there, so they allow you to parole to where you are from.

This will mean Maurice Clemmons can't get out of prison in Arkansas and go shoot cops in Washington. It will also mean that that guy from Seattle who got busted in Arkansas won't be able to go home until he's off parole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyc 4 Biden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. If someone is arrested and convicted in state court,
they can be sent to a prison in a different state??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flaneur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. No, well, actually, yes, but mainly no.
People convictd in state court are sent to prisons in the state where they were sentenced--unless that state's prisons are full and it is paying another state to take its prisoners.

And actually, people imprisoned in one state can apply to be transferred to their home state.

But that isn't what this is about. It's about ending cooperation with Arkansas on the Interstate Compact governing parolees from there going to Washington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Parolees should always go to a state not their own state
In fact, they should be required to serve parole at least two states away.

That would remove them from the circle of acquaintences where they got in trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flaneur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. That would be counterproductive.
Not only would it remove them from their "circle of acquaintances," it would remove them from their families and the world they know. And it would be unnecessarily cruel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Often it is their families and the "world that they know" that got them into trouble
in the first place. As to "cruelty", if they don't want to comply with the terms of parole, they can stay in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flaneur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. So let me get this straight:
You want someone who grew up in Nebraska, committed a crime in Nebraska, and went to prison in Nebraska to have to do his parole in North Carolina?

Typically, when prisoners get out of prison, they have few resources. The state usually gives them something like $50, a bus ticket home and a set of clothes. If they are returning to their community, they have a social network that can support their successful re-entry into society. If they are paroled in a different state, they know no one and have no support network, making their successful re-entry less likely. Is that what you really want?

And by the way, those parolees you would like to see stay in prison cost taxpayers about $30,000 a year each.

But you're not about successful re-entry, are you? You're all about punishment. Frankly, I think America goes way overboard on the punishment stuff, which is why we're the world's leading incarcerator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Prison is pointless if you simply turn the prisoners back to the same social situation
Sure, it might cost more to support them in getting a new start in a new community. But they would have a better chance at getting their life together and not simply winding up back in prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I'm fine with that. Good job Gregoire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flaneur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. I think it is an overly broad response that will hurt some Washington families.
This means the guy from Seattle who got busted with pot in Arkansas will not be able to return home to do his parole.

Gregoire could have/should have limited this to violent offenders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 05:26 PM
Original message
An interstate compact....
...is an agreement between two or more states of the United States of America. Article I, Section 10 of the United States Constitution provides that "no state shall enter into an agreement or compact with another state" without the consent of Congress. Frequently, these agreements create a new governmental agency which is responsible for administering or improving some shared resource such as a seaport or public transportation infrastructure. In some cases, a compact serves simply as a coordination mechanism between independent authorities in the member states. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstate_compact">link)


- In this instance the compact covers the http://www.interstatecompact.org/">Interstate Commission for Adult Offender Supervision

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. That should be easy to enforce.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
winyanstaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. as far as I knew...people were paroled in the state they committed the crime in.
It is normally very difficult for a parolee to move to a different state.
Myself, I have a hard time understanding how ANY violent offender ever gets back out...and why non-violent drug offenders stay in prison in the first place while murderers and child rapists go home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Non-voilent inmates are money makers for the Prison Industrial Complex
Hard-core prisoners can never earn their keep, thus the street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
winyanstaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. exactly...and it thereby insures even more reason for gun control etc...
when they turn violent people lose.
And in the meantime...slavery is alive and well and behind big cement walls where the public cant see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. So rather than recognize Washington State's recklessness with his parole and
his subsequent arrest a few weeks ago, she's blaming Arkansas? Too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foxfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. AFAIK, she has not suggested that Arkansas is solely responsible
for Clemmons' release from the criminal justice system. Nor has she "refused to recognize Washington's 'recklessness' with his parole and his subsequent arrest a few weeks ago." Washington State will investigate its own role in the situation and will certainly take steps to avoid future such occurrences. Refusing to accept parolees from Arkansas is the first, most public step in that process. Whatever the nature of Washington's failures, Arkansas failed catastrophically in its obligations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. So you think that it was okay for a 16yo to be sentenced to 99 years for burglary?
Unbelievable and truly sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foxfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. So you're fond of putting words in other people's mouths?
Dishonest and truly cheap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. WA has a problem too but granting clemency to everyone isn't one of them.
Edited on Wed Dec-02-09 06:55 PM by superconnected
Our jails/prisons are underfunded which is the only reason prisoners get out - to let more in.

We've been way underfunded since President bush cut the federal funding for all states back in 2001. I was working at the City of Seattle court and jail when the email came out that they had no more money and could only afford lock up offenders that were immediately violent threats. They also shut down the parole office because of lack of funding. It(the parole office) ended up being run by cops in a make shift operation in the police dept and only for the worst criminals.

This was around the time Oregon was threatening to let all of it's sex offenders loose due to lack of funding. Both states routinely have let out sex offenders that normally would stay in over the last 9 years - because of the lack of funding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. Gregoire does her best
work when she is angry and this is a good starting point for this mess.
Arkansas and their goofball ex-governor failed miserably in this instance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
14. And the blame is now back in Arkansas' court. Good job Gregoire.
Huckabee certainly tried to blame it on Washington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
18. PA Gov. Rendell froze all State paroles in '08 when it was found
that a Philadelphia police officer was murdered by bank robbers who had just been paroled for violent felonys. All 4 had gun violation charges dropped in plea bargains - one was just released and supposedly on his way to a halfway house, decided to rob a Philly bank instead using more stolen guns.
ALL 4 individuals would still have been in prison at the time of the robbery if they had not been paroled, and the cop would still be alive.

I understand that parole for violent convicts just began again on December 1, and I am trying to find what changes were made to our evidently defective system

Prisons jammed with drug buyers while murderers are paroled-great idea.......


mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC