Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

$130 Million for Helicopter Obama Doesn't Want

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 03:47 PM
Original message
$130 Million for Helicopter Obama Doesn't Want
Source: Sphere

(Dec. 16) -- What he really wants is health care reform. But Congress' Christmas present to President Barack Obama may instead be a helicopter he insists he doesn't need. The 2010 defense appropriations bill is expected to provide more than $100 million to continue work on the VH-71 -- the next Marine One -- even though it was officially terminated this spring.

"The helicopter I have now seems perfectly adequate to me," Obama joked in February when asked about the troubled program, whose costs had spiraled to over $13 billion. "Of course, I've never had a helicopter before -- maybe I've been deprived and I didn't know it."

Just a few months later, in May, the Pentagon officially canceled the program to build the new fleet of the helicopters.

Managed by the U.S. Navy, the VH-71 is under contract to a team of companies led by Lockheed Martin and based on a commercial helicopter produced by AgustaWestland. Five helicopters were built before the contract was deep-sixed.

So why fund a terminated program? Either way, the government owes the contractor cancellation fees, but in this case the requested $130 million appropriation looks like Lockheed and its congressional allies are trying (to borrow a phrase) to keep hope alive.

Read more: http://www.sphere.com/nation/article/130-million-for-helicopter-obama-says-he-doesnt-want/19282313



:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, they've always got a few billion for the MIC
it's we, the taxpayer, who doesn't get squat for our money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Even if Obama does not want, it's the Marines job to protect him.
Perhaps some people think a new helicpter would go a long way for protection when hes with the Navy.
The current helicpter designs are getting pretty dated.
If it were my job to protect the president, I'd want the best I could get. :shrug:

Besides, it helps save hundreds of American jobs. Not such a bad thing IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm sure homeless veterans will applaud this
"Pass the soup, I'm hungry", said one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cutlassmama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. It may save jobs, but what about all the other stuff the money could do for Americans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. The US military is under CIVILIAN control. Just thought you should know. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. The current helos are Korean era design and are basically deathtraps in case of a
major in flight emergency. A new one is well overdue for that reason alone.

Prior versions were a government/contractor hybrid. However this version was contractor only. They kept repeating the analysis until they found a way not to have the team that has kept Marine 1 updated and flying participate in the latest version.

A better answer would be to return to that paradigm and fund at a lower level until times are better and then build a mature design at much lower risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brendan120678 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Interesting story...
More from the article:
------------------------------------------------
It's hard to know precisely what factors drove up the price of the VH-71, since much of the equipment installed on the helicopter is classified. But at least some items on the government's wish list appeared capricious. "Rumor had it that the helicopter doors were moved from one side to the other," Aboulafia says. "Bizarre stuff."

There are also amenities, like a bathroom and a kitchen, that further increasing the total price tag.

Aboulafia, who visited Lockheed's facility in Owego, N.Y., notes that the airframes are just sitting in the factory -- and that rebooting a new presidential helicopter program from scratch in the future would be a losing proposition for everyone. "It makes zero sense," he says. "It's not as if there are other possible contenders."

Democratic Rep. Maurice Hinchey, whose New York district includes Owego, has spearheaded efforts to keep the program going, and argues that starting over would cost the Pentagon billions more. The approximately $130 million the current draft of the defense bill requests for the helicopters is clearly not enough to complete the $13 billion program; instead, it's intended to help keep workers in place and some momentum intact. "It's for continued work on communications and software," says Jeff Lieberson, a spokesman for Hinchey.
-------------------------------------------------------

I'll admit, I was a big proponent of this airframe over the Sikorsky alternative when the source selection was ongoing. Probably because I'm originally from that area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlipperySlope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. If he doesn't want it, he is welcome to give it to me.
I'm not kidding - I think it would be a blast to own a Presidential helicopter, even if I could never afford to fly it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hassin Bin Sober Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Sounds like you could live in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. Dangerous vehicles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. Either that or more money that can be re-appropraited to "off the books" missions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. why fund a terminated program? In whose district is it being built?
Edited on Wed Dec-16-09 06:28 PM by SemperEadem
find the representative and senator of that district/state and you will find the reason for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Owego, New York ---> Rep. Hinchey (D)
Has been a NY Rep almost 17 yrs. Seems fairly progressive.
He's in the Comittee on Appropriations (Subcommittee on Defense).

$100M is alot of money and jobs for his district.
I would hope any Representative fights for local jobs like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. Heh.
Well, there's really very little Obama can do if the Secret Service decides he needs an upgraded helicopter (short of going down to the assembly yard and beating up the foreman).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC