Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP sources: Suicide bomber invited on base

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
darkstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 04:35 PM
Original message
AP sources: Suicide bomber invited on base
Edited on Thu Dec-31-09 04:40 PM by darkstar
Source: AP

WASHINGTON – The suicide bomber who killed seven CIA employees and wounded six more at a remote outpost in southeastern Afghanistan had been invited onto the base and had not been searched, two former U.S. officials have told The Associated Press.

A former senior intelligence official says the man was being courted as an informant and that it was the first time he had been brought inside the camp.

The official says a senior and experienced CIA debriefer came from Kabul for the meeting, suggesting that the purpose of the meeting was to gain intelligence.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091231/ap_on_go_ot/us_cia_afghan_attack



I've got nothing to add. Stunned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. All the more reason to be out of that miserable hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. He likely had the bomb stuffed up his own miserable hole
It's unbelievable. Next will be a mother with her freshly gutted baby that's been stuffed with explisives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I'm guessing a freshly gutted baby would cause difficulties in getting on base.
They invited this guy in, and did not search him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Weird story. Might want to step up security precautions a little, ya think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. One of them main reasons fighting a modern indigenous insurgency is futile.
They are only your friend until they find the opportunity to kill you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darkstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Right. If you can't
trust an informant you've cultivated to the extent that you fly in agents, have the station chief present, etc., there's no winning that hearts and minds ground game, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
givemebackmycountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Boy, post #4 and post #5 say everything that I am thinking.
We ain't gonna "WIN" jack shit so fuck every asshole that says we must be "victorious".
We ain't gonna "change" shit, it's been that way for 2000 years and they kicked everyones ass that said "dudes, you need to change".
We ain't learned dick because last time I looked, there wasn't any Princeton there but these people are smart when it comes to blowing your ass up.
They ain't ever going to love us, respect us, be like us and they just are not that "into us".
We can spend every dime we have trying to make things better for them (while ignoring OUR country) and the first opportunity they get, they will exact revenge.

We need to get the fuck out of there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I've been thinking for a while about this, that since it is so obvious,
we must be there for a reason which has not been disclosed publicly, but which is considered overwhelmingly compelling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. yes, that is so obvious it is painful when I hear talk about "winning"
The purpose is not to "win," it is to control that area of Asia so that the Chinese can't control the flow of petroleum. But that wouldn't win the hearts and minds of the voters in America. You have to jack them up with some fantasy about Osama bin Laden and the Taliban and democracry for people who don't want it. (Especially because our "democracy" means easy access for corporate exploitation.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bermudat Donating Member (985 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Ditto
They blew up the CIA? I thought the CIA were supposed to be badass.

So the CIA can't protect themselves any better than this?

This country needs to get the f*ck out but we won't because Obama

is invested in being a war president and the war profiteers won't

allow it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. As cluster fucks go -- this one is going
To be hard to beat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. So because he was a possible informant they threw all protocol
out the window. What the hell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. It was also the LAST time he was iinvited into the camp,,, FOLLOW PROTOCOL!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pjt7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. The Asian Development Bank
is behind the Afghan Pipleline, who works for them in our Gov.?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BP2 Donating Member (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. Gotta ask:

Why the hell are we there again?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Could be, because our banker wants a pipeline to Iran,
and does not want to take the heat himself. How else can we repay debts, other than as a mercenary army?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. Dick cheney is available. let's send him there as a citizen volunteer nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arrowhead2k1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
16. lol, they really think they can get these tribal people on "our" infidel side? How naive.
Edited on Thu Dec-31-09 07:58 PM by Arrowhead2k1
This ain't Iraq. These people are even more extreme. They should be isolated not conquered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. The base was close to Pakistan
They must have trusted this guy. I wonder if that is significant. I also wonder if this has a connection to the allegations of U.S. forces pulling people (including 14 year olds) out of bed and shooting them. Perhaps a trusted source went off the reservation and decided to extract revenge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I was wondering if there was a connection too.
No way to tell so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. The timing of events is noteworthy
The IED that killed the 5 Canadians was at about the same time, in an area that was supposed to be secure. It could be that somebody may have decided to send a message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. Something like that.
It seems clear they got suckered, and that makes it clear they can be suckered. I have a distinct feeling that - like in Yemen - we are being played.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. The possibility of drugs also occurred to me
Edited on Fri Jan-01-10 07:04 PM by daleo
There is a body of opinion that says intelligence agencies like the CIA get involved with drug running, whether to secure un-sourced "black" funding or just because agents fall prey to the temptations of easy money. If that were the case, undocumented visits by locals in the heroin trade would be likely. Perhaps that explains the lack of security in this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Yipes.
I dunno. Speculating. But the ingredients are all there, and that would make you a real witches brew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
21. since when do they tell us about CIA agents getting killed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. Thank you. I've actually been wondering about that myself.
Doesn't it potentially put other assets in danger of exposure?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #21
35. THAT is a very good question. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
23. WTF is going on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
26. See if he ever gets invited anywhere else again. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
27. Afghanistan Suicide Bomber May Have Been Helped by CIA Informant
Source: Wall Street Journal

KABUL--The suicide bomber who killed eight Americans, including seven CIA officers, this week might have been able to get through multiple layers of security at the U.S. compound aided by an Afghan informant with the agency, a Western official said Friday.

If this is true, it suggests insurgents had turned the tables on the CIA and been able to place their own agents close to the facility the CIA used to cultivate informants.

On Wednesday, CIA officials had invited the attacker onto the base with the hopes of recruiting him as an informant. They used an Afghan intermediary to arrange the meeting. The attacker arrived, wearing an Afghan army uniform, officials said.

The assault shows a strategy the insurgency has increasingly employed here in recent months: using the uniforms and vehicles of the Afghan army and police to carry out attacks.

At times, militants strike with the help of sympathizers in the Afghan forces. In November, an Afghan police officer opened fire on Western forces, killing five British soldiers, and a similar incident happened in early December. Insurgent sympathizers in the police force helped plan both attacks, Afghan officials said.

Read more: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126235171131012657.html?mod=article-outset-box
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. can we declare "victory" and bring our folks home now?
please?


It's not like our staying there is actually helping anything, except the bank accunts of the corporations supplying arms and equipment to the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. It's pretty damn obvious they had turned the tables. It's Afghanistan. Their home turf.
They have an inherent advantage.

Afghanistan is much larger than Iraq, more tribal and less centralized. To state the obvious, this means a different strategy than used in Iraq is required.

Anti-US forces have had six years to plan for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sulphurdunn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. How many CIA spooks do we have over there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigmack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. 7 less than we did.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. Reportedly, our suicide bomber was
being recruited as an informant/collaborator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Why do we think the people we invade are stupid? Afghani's have
been outwitting colonialists for centuries. Arrogance...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC