Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP Sources: Obama likes national health exchange

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
demoleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 04:56 PM
Original message
AP Sources: Obama likes national health exchange
Source: ap

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama has indicated support for a national clearinghouse where consumers could shop for health coverage and an end to the decades-old antitrust exemption enjoyed by insurance companies, Democratic officials said Tuesday.

In signaling his preferences, Obama is siding with House Democrats over their Senate counterparts on issues crucial to negotiations on his health care overhaul.
...
Obama met with House Democratic leaders last week as they sought support from the president on other priorities. He is now indicating support for creation of a national exchange rather than the state-based structure in the Senate bill, and for revoking the antitrust exemption, which the Senate bill does not do, the officials said.

The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because the negotiations were private.


Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100112/ap_on_bi_ge/us_health_care_overhaul
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. But will this mean anything?
Unless he says he won't sign it unless it includes a national health exchange than what is it worth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-13-10 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
19. A Democratic President has no influence at all on a Democratic Congress?
Edited on Wed Jan-13-10 12:42 AM by No Elephants
I've posted since February or March that Obama will sign almost anything called a health care reform bill that gets to his desk for signature and declare victory. IMO, he really cannot do anything else if he wants to be re-elected--and, as of now, he clearly does. However, I don't think his statements about his preferences are for nothing, either. Besides, the Democrats in Congress want him re-elected, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. so what? he "liked" single payer a long time ago, he "liked" a public option
oh, and "the negotiations were private."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shopgreen Donating Member (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-13-10 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
18. I thought he always said single payer would not work in America?
Edited on Wed Jan-13-10 12:37 AM by No Elephants
I thought his statements about single payer were always along the lines of "Single payer is the best way, but it wouldn't work in America because we already have all these legacy plans." (not exact words)

BTW, by "legacy plans" I assume he meant primarily employer provided insurance, but I was never sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-13-10 04:18 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. yes, we had to give that up without even trying
the same way legalizing marijuana is a joke that can't even be considered
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. He Likes Fairies and Harry Potter, Too?
Why not like something that exists already in society, and works? And then fight for it! That's what he was hired to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. What? Maybe I'm misunderstanding you.
In the context of health care, what is that already exists, works, is worth fighting for, and that he was in fact hired to fight for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I'm guessing, simply extend Medicare? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Yes, that is likely what Demeter was thinking, and I agree.
I don't know where my head was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. dupe-self deleted
Edited on Tue Jan-12-10 05:21 PM by Demeter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. "National clearinghouse" could be similar to FEHB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shopgreen Donating Member (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Its Tom Dashel's plan. Read his book or plug into goggle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. Boxers or briefs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. K-Y or spit?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groundloop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
12. Yes, but will Joe like it?
Seems that pleasing Lie-berman is all that's going to matter in this mess. It'll be interesting to see if Joe will allow congress to revoke the anti-trust exemption.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. duh?
He said this in his September speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. Hmmmm.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
15. It's still shoveling money to the private insurers
with no guarantees of access to care.

And, I wonder if a "national exchange" means the crooks can sell across state lines so they'll all head for the state with the least regulation, just like the credit card companies did.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #15
23. Could be how they market cutting off states' ability to regulate?
I thought that was separate though and was a sure bet to be in the final bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-13-10 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
17. Hate to interrupt the snark here, but THIS is the important part: ENDING THE ANTITRUST EXEMPTION!
> President Barack Obama has indicated support for ... an end to the decades-old antitrust exemption enjoyed by insurance companies...
> In signaling his preferences, Obama is siding with HOUSE Democrats over their Senate counterparts ...

He wants the House bill, the one that has the best deal *so far*. He wants the health insurance corps to be subject to antitrust laws, which is huge.

This is good news. I don't give a damn if the negotiations are private as long as it gets done and we get the House bill instead of the Senate one. If the negotiations were public at this point we'd have the usual teabaggery, obfuscation, and outright lies from the Repubs and their RWnut talking heads, and it would be stalled yet again.

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-13-10 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
20. Eliminating the antitrust exemption might be easier if the negotiations were not private.
I cannot imagine anyone who wants to get re-elected having a good story for why they honestly believed the health insurers should continue to have a monopoly.

Would competition by all insurers on a national exchange mean regulation in individual states would have to go, as the Republicans have been arguing for?

As always, the devil--or the divinity--will be in the details, and we don't have those yet. For that matter, we don't know if this will come to fruition.

I am not sure about the national exchange, but I will email my Senators and Representative that the monopoly exemption should go.

Of course, if Martha Coakley does not win in Massachusetts, we may get no health care reform except what her Republican opponent wants.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-13-10 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
22. Don't care what he likes. The American people have been ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC