Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Military review: Troubling signals from Fort Hood suspect missed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 11:15 AM
Original message
Military review: Troubling signals from Fort Hood suspect missed
Source: CNN

Washington (CNN) -- An upcoming military review of the Fort Hood, Texas, shootings finds that the alleged shooter, Maj. Nidal Hasan, was promoted despite supervisors' concerns about his extremist views on Islam and odd behavior.

The review also says that a lack of communication between the U.S. military and a terrorism task force did not allow the sharing of information to determine whether he was a terrorist threat months before the shooting.

CNN was told details of the Pentagon review by a U.S. official with direct knowledge of the report. The official did not want to be identified because the report, requested by Defense Secretary Robert Gates, will not be officially released until Thursday.

The Defense Department review, led by former Chief of Naval Operation Adm. Vernon Clark and former Army Secretary Togo West, will recommend the Army and the entire military focus more on looking internally for potential threats among the troops, according to the official.

The review does not look into the reported e-mail communications between Hasan and the radical cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, who is based in Yemen and also has possible ties to the Christmas Day airline bombing plot. Those ties are being looked at in a separate criminal investigation by the Army.

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/01/12/fort.hood.suspect/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
change_notfinetuning Donating Member (750 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Again, a failure to connect the dots, plain and simple. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Some failures are simple failures.
My grad department just about imploded but that "failure" to connect the dots was actually an incredible resistance to connect the dots.

When the connect-the-dot picture was presented to the department, they all got out their erasers and tried to erase the lines connecting the dots and, when that failed, they tried altering the numbers to say that the lines were misdrawn and that "suspension of admissions", "faculty positions to remain open indefinitely" and "spiritual malaise" were actually "increased funding", "here, have even more faculty positions," and "joyous, happy grad students".

The dean was not amused. Amazingly not amused.

So it was with Hasan. And I expect Obama at some point to be not amused. Amazingly not amused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Looks more like a purposeful failure to connect the dots . . . unless...
up is down, war is peace -- and insanity is sanity?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Rather, it looks like we were trying to keep someone with potential as a "terrorist" around ...
Wonder why?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC