Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Insurer Antitrust Exemption Repeal Gets Push From 18 Dem Senators

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 04:52 PM
Original message
Insurer Antitrust Exemption Repeal Gets Push From 18 Dem Senators
Source: P&C National Underwriter

WASHINGTON—Eighteen Democratic senators have written congressional leaders and the White House urging that the final health care reform bill draft include language repealing the antitrust exemption afforded health and medical liability insurers.

At the same time, insurance industry officials are lobbying senators not to vote for any final bill that includes such a provision, especially as it regards medical liability insurers.

The senators’ letter was written under the aegis of Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and sent to President Obama, Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., and Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., the speaker of the House. They are leading intense negotiations aimed at producing a compromise bill combining versions of health care delivery reform legislation passed by the House and Senate.

“For nearly 65 years, the insurance industry has been exempt from federal antitrust laws. Regulation of the insurance industry has been left with the states, which often lack the time and resources to effectively investigate antitrust conspiracies,” the senators wrote.

Thus, the letter said, “the competitive activities of health insurers and medical malpractice insurers remain effectively unchecked.”

Read more: http://www.property-casualty.com/News/2010/1/Pages/Insurer-Antitrust-Exemption-Repeal-Gets-Push-From-18-Dem-Senators--.aspx



Odd source, I know, but slim pickings just yet.

Signatories (an interesting mix, frankly) were Senators John F. Kerry, John D. Rockefeller IV, Joseph I Lieberman, Dianne Feinstein, Russell D. Feingold, Ron Wyden, Mary L. Landrieu, Charles E. Schumer, Maria Cantwell, Frank Lautenberg, Bernard Sanders, Claire McCaskill, Sheldon Whitehouse, Roland Burris, Edward Kaufman, Michael Bennet, Kirsten E. Gillibrand, and Al Franken.

The only full text of the letter I could find is here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
naaman fletcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. how can anyone be against this?
I have yet to find anyone like National Review or any republican politicians explain the rationale for why the anti-trust exemption should be upheld. Does anyone know where I can find one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alstephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I asked the same question on another thread.
WHY do the insurance companies say they need an anti-trust exemption??? I can't think of any good reasons either...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sen Landrieu??? She must be putting on pressure for more lobbyist money. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I know, right?
...And show me another official document with Lieberman and Franken both signing on. I mean other than the Congressional parking pass applications. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bravo Sen Cantwell. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. Gee... I don't see Indiana's Senator Evan Bayh on this list.
Could it be because his wife's relationship with the health industry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThisThreadIsSatire Donating Member (697 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. The way to get this through...
... is to pass the bill now "as-is" and then introduce this ON ITS OWN, where it won't get lost among any other provisions.

A vote on this lone provision, prior to the election could force people's hands -- after all, open competition & free markets are more of a 'Republican' principle. But forcing any industry to compete the way all the others must is sure to have overwhelming public support -- so why add it to a bill where attention can be deflected to other issues and have it fail for the wrong reasons?

If we can get the bill as-is, and add this before the midterms, it would not only do more than a watered-down public option or 55+ Medicare buy-in would to lower costs, but would also ensure greater success for both health care reform and the Democrats...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. Lieberman signed on??? Makes me wonder about the details if he agrees with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Indeed. Some odd bedfellows here. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. Insurance ought not be the province of private enterprise.
It is the classic case for communal action. This is an attempt to stave off the "public option", which is and always has been the only sensible option for any sort of individual insurance against common calamities, if one is concerned about the public interest. Medicare and Social Security are both huge successes and ought to be emulated wherever appropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. impressive. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IRemember Donating Member (118 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. Wow, no Max Baucus. Big surprise.
Corrupt bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. How many of them are up for re-election I wonder?
I'm surprised to see Lieberman on the list. Maybe those devastating polls have finally reminded him of who he is supposed to be working for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC