Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

For (SecDef) Gates Aides, No (Military) Fatigues at Work

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 06:36 PM
Original message
For (SecDef) Gates Aides, No (Military) Fatigues at Work
Edited on Mon Jan-18-10 06:38 PM by RamboLiberal
Source: NY Times

WASHINGTON — Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates has told his military aides not to wear combat fatigues to work at the Pentagon any more, reversing a symbolic change of protocol ordered in the harrowing days after the attacks of Sept. 11.

There was no formal announcement that Mr. Gates had directed his military staff to shed their fatigues in favor of business uniforms — the smartly pressed ones bedecked with combat medals and service ribbons that are the military equivalent of civilian coat-and-tie, worn with dress shoes, not combat boots.

But throughout the Defense Department, where every action by the civilian boss is parsed by officers with a care akin to old-school Kremlinology, Mr. Gates’s decision is likely to prompt deliberations across the armed services on whether to follow his example.

The defense secretary’s instructions took effect with the start of the new year, and were directed at only some of the 23,000 employees at the Pentagon. Even so, the change has been noticed by recent visitors to Mr. Gates’s third-floor suite of offices and has become a topic of conversation along the Pentagon’s 17.5 miles of corridors.

The switch to camouflage and flight suits became the norm in the days after Sept. 11, 2001, and it made a statement: The building itself was a terrorist target; the nation was on a war footing; and it was thought important that even military personnel on the home front should dress for combat.



Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/19/us/politics/19pentagon.html?hp



IMHO, he needs to make that Pentagon-wide if personnel are doing office jobs. Oh and good for the Navy - they never went to BDU's at the Pentagon after 9-11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aSpeckofDust Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. You called?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That makes no sense at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. That looks like Rumsfeld in a mask and gloves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PacerLJ35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. You give him too much credit...
Rummy isn't in that kind of shape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pjt7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Gates is CIA
& they should NEVER be in charge of our military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasProgresive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. What does Gates being ex CIA have to do with this order?
Edited on Mon Jan-18-10 08:20 PM by TexasProgresive
I thought it strange that military personnel were not in proper uniforms when not in combat. This must've been something that Rummy came up with along with the order that only the pretzeldent could be call commander in chief - so CiCPAC and all the rest lost their traditional titles to boost the ego of the AWAL deserter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
19. Hear, hear - bring back the CinCs

It's ridiculous to have these stupid 'combatant commander' titles out there just because multiple CinCs was confusing or threatening to that little coward, Shrub.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodyM Donating Member (127 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. A few weeks back
I saw the coffins of some of our soldiers who were in killed in action being unload from the plane. The ones who were doing this duty was dressed in fatigues. As one who’s military service in the Army, National Guard and Reserves together reach almost fourteen years and going from private to major this enraged me.

This was no work detail or common every day assignment. They should have been dressed in a dress uniform that was clean, well fitting and well pressed. Any and every thing that could be shined and spit polished should have been done so. Each man should been wearing every award, decoration or ribbon he had ever earned.

This was an Honor Duty!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. If I die on AD, I want to be carried by USAF aircraft maintenance troops...
Edited on Mon Jan-18-10 10:52 PM by PavePusher
Crew Chiefs, Engine, Hydraulic, Fuels and Electrical troops, with the dirtiest, most grease, oil, fuel, hydro, sweat and blood stained BDU's they can find. Better yet, coveralls. Preferably folks from the helicopter world.

I didn't get my job done by sitting behind a computer looking pretty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Doubt Gates (or the CIC) is responsible for choice of uniform for troops at that level, but
Edited on Mon Jan-18-10 11:12 PM by No Elephants
you make an excellent point. Maybe you should email or call the WH about that; and someone there can pass down the word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. I had no idea.....your POV is enlightening.
So the whole tenor of the military has changed, is that what I am hearing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PacerLJ35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. Uh....so?
I guess the NY Times ran out of things to write about. Wearing service uniforms (ie, button-up shirt, tie, slacks) is pretty standard in most headquarters units. Many of them even have a "utilities" day (sort of like "Jeans Friday") where you can wear your utility uniform or flight suit. But for the most part, service personnel assigned to staff jobs typically wear their service uniform, not utilities. It's probably a topic of discussion now because Pentagon folks got used to wearing utilities (which are much more comfortable...think wearing sweats and sneakers to work versus a suit). But this isn't really news. The Air Force has instituted a service-wide mandate that those not engaging in activities requiring utilities must wear their blue service uniform on Mondays. I have no idea what it's supposed to do, but hey, that's what the boss wants. So I promptly try to get put on the flying schedule every Monday so I can wear my flight suit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. Dress uniforms are hideously uncomfortable, impractical and expensive...
Edited on Mon Jan-18-10 10:58 PM by PavePusher
and should be binned as soon as possible. And I think my USAF Blues are incredibly ugly. A blind Boy Scout with Parkinsons could have designed something better.

I don't know what the Uniform Boards are given to smoke, but I think I'd like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. particularly for women
Hey, remember when that AF Chief of Staff wanted to use uniforms that looked like Navy uniforms?

I am old enough to remember wearing khakis.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I just missed khakis...
And had to extend my commitment (due to promotion, yipee) long enough that I won't be able to retire in BDU's. I'll have to get the ABU's for at least a year or two. Damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PacerLJ35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. ABUs are terrible
It's like wearing a suit of cardboard. Back when DCUs were authorized, lots of aircrew would wear the DCU in theater when they weren't flying because it was more comfortable than the DFDU (desert flight suit). Now it's the other way around...no one wears the ABU unless forced to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PacerLJ35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I think the blues were made for victims of a famine...
Because I normally have a 35/36 waist, and I need to buy the size 42 and have the waist hemmed in just so my damn legs fit in the pants without looking like I have spandex on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. LMAO
I can just imagine seeing that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Ditto. they are really horrible for sitting.
Seems the entire uniform was designed only for people who stand all day. But they forgot to tell that to the shoes... (Ouch!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 06:02 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. Depends on the Service
back 40 years ago, when I was a newly minted Ensign, USNR. the Navy officer dress blues were no more uncomfortable than your average business suit. The dress whites were a tad uncomfortable because of the high snug fitting collar. I even found the service dress khaki comfortable, if it was not to hot outside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
18. Combat boots to work in the Pentagon? Spare me. Bush was the dress up President.
Always very conscious of his outfit, be it a flight jacket or golf shoes. But, none of it matched his life. Well, okay, maybe the golf shoes.

He was like America's Barbie doll. You can put her in scrubs, but that doesn't mean she knows squat about medicine,

Republican politicians seem fixated on empty symbolism, making a big deal about wearing flag pins, as they vote against veterans' benefits over and over, until even Don Imus screams about it.

Lord, I just have no respect for them as a group. And no respect for anyone who buys into and/or publicizes that shat, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
20. Navy probably didn't switch because their ''fatigues'' are so ugly they look like prison uniforms



They make sense squeezing between pipes and boilers in the bowels of a ship, but on land, they just don't look right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
22. ''Business Uniforms'' sums up what the Military Industrial Complex is all about.
Trillions missing, let alone wasted. Wall Street's doing well, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 03:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC