Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sen. Leahy: Court's decision most partisan since Bush v. Gore

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 12:14 PM
Original message
Sen. Leahy: Court's decision most partisan since Bush v. Gore
Source: The Hill


Sen. Leahy: Court's decision most partisan since Bush v. Gore
By Susan Crabtree - 01/28/10 11:50 AM ET

The Supreme Court’s decision on campaign spending is its most partisan since Bush v. Gore, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) said Thursday.

Leahy took a broadside to the decision in a floor speech, criticizing it for overturning nearly a century of restrictions on corporate and union independent expenditures in elections.

“The Citizens United decision turns the idea of government of, by and for the people on its head, and creates new rights for Wall Street at the expense of Main Street,” Leahy said in a Leahy said.

He condemned it as the court’s most partisan ruling since its decision effectively declaring George W. Bush the winner of Florida and the 2000 presidential election.

Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/78527-sen-leahy-courts-decision-most-partisan-since-bush-v-gore-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. KNR!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SPedigrees Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Give em hell Leahy!
Edited on Thu Jan-28-10 12:31 PM by SPedigrees
I'm so proud of our Vermont senators. A pity Washington doesn't have more of Leahy and Sanders' ilk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, Duh!
Seeing as the same criminals (and their assigns) are responsible for both, it stands to reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. One leads to the other, and if the first was a crime ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thank you Senator Leahy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. Someone on Olberman last night described it as "political expression" . .. !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. KnR4VT but, really, it can't be that partisan if a good chunk of the Dems wept for joy when the
ruling came down...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. How should we count moles in the partisan equation? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
road2000 Donating Member (995 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. Had Bush v. Gore not happened,
we wouldn't be mourning this decision today.

And no matter how disillusioned many on this board are over Obama, he did not -- and will not -- appoint a right-wing nutcase to SCOTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. How do you know?
Bush's two Justices were both in his second term. It's no done deal that Gore would have been re-elected in 2004. He might have, but 16 years of one party controlling the WH seems rather unlikely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marthe48 Donating Member (473 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. FDR+Truman = 16 yrs
1932 to 1948 -- the Repugs screwed over the country good enough in 1920's for the electorate to be turned off their party, and they're doing another good enough screwing now, 16 yrs in Dem control could happen. The way things are going, it won't, but it could.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. except that Truman left office in 1953, following Eisenhower's
election in 1952.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marthe48 Donating Member (473 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. and FDR died without finishing his 4th term
but it was a great run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SPedigrees Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. That is the truth, Road2000. And the key to overturning this and preventing
other equally bad decisions is to keep Obama in office for a second term and vote in another dem after O's second term. Decades of republican rule unleashed this band of jackals on us, and only democrats can tip the scales by appointing sane judges (and hopefully young healthy ones) over the coming years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. Turn the heat up, Pat
Turn it up higher.

In fact turn it up so high that Alito's wife starts weeping uncontrollably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
santamargarita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. And we really got fucked on that too!
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laylah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. Flay them!
www.supremecourtus.gov
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
14. K&R. And yet a la Gingrich, the GOP accuses the other side of wanting activist judges.
When their appointees have been the most activist.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:54 AM
Response to Original message
18. Yes, it is another major power grab by the GOP Gang of Five.
Count me among those who want Democrats to go after the Supreme Court. Investigate them. Investigate their hunting trips with Cheney. Make their benefactors come to congress and discuss the fancy manner in which the justices are kept on their hunting and golfing outings at the expense of people who have major economic or political interests in the cases before the court.

Scalia should be impeached and removed for misconduct, including inappropriate gifts from litigants before his court. Alito and Roberts should be impeached and removed for lying under oath to congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
19.  The founders
were not perfect men,one of their biggest mistakes was making supreme courts justices a life time job.Just as cabinet members,they should serve at the pleasure of the standing president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC