Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' hearing Tues.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 02:21 PM
Original message
'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' hearing Tues.
Source: MSNBC

From NBC's Courtney Kube
A senior defense official says to expect Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Admiral Mike Mullen provide more details about the end of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" during the Senate Budget hearings next Tuesday and Wednesday.

Another official said the current idea is to have the Senate Armed Services hearing on the budget for a few hours and then switch to Don't Ask Don't Tell for the last hour or so.

The Joint Chiefs still have not worked out details on how military policy or infrastructure may change if DADT is repealed. One senior defense official said they will examine the need for actual changes in infrastructure -- separate berthing, showers, etc. -- NOT because they believe there needs to be separate facilities, but only to be prepared for critics who have said this could be an issue for the military.

Last summer, Gates asked the Defense Department's general counsel to examine whether the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" is implemented humanely -- for example, should a jilted lover be allowed to expose someone's sexuality.

Read more: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2010/01/28/2188039.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. i wont ask, if you dont tell
did you notice when the President announced that, the military row did not stand up....:grr: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiller4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They are not supposed to show any display of support or opposition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Oh, but they did anyhow.
The scowls on their faces deepened when he mentioned it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. BS -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kYW_fgaDDM&feature=player_embedded - start watching around 58 minutes... they all stand and cheer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. They aren't there to show reaction. In fact, they are not suppose to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. Thats why they stood and clapped at other comments


Check out the standing ovation from the Joint Chiefs at 59:00 when the president mentions sticking it to Iran over their nuclear program

Youtube of the speech: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kYW_fgaDDM&feature=player_embedded
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Few hours - budget", "An hour or so - DADT"
Does that sound like they are actually going to do anything to begin addressing this?

Sounds like a crumb to me in a desperate attempt to try to hoodwink anyone out there whose not paying attention that the Obama Admin now cares about some of those under the bus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It only takes 1 moment to say the Military won't enforce DADT and request Congress to pass a repeal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. You really think that's what they are going to do? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. And a year for Congress to fight the idea tooth and nail. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
31. Or, to act under the Constitution and/or 10 U.S.C. 12305.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gcomeau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Don't be ridiculous.
The entire freaking defense budget is about a thousand times more complicated than discusing one single personnel policy. Devoting that percentage of the session to the issue most certainly does sound like they're taking it seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. So you don't think THIS personnel policy is troublesome or time consuming??!
Perhaps I'm misreading it but an hour "or so" sounds pretty small for THIS particular personnel policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gcomeau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. AS troublesome and time consuming...
...as all the details contained in a multi hundred billion dollar defense budget?

NO. It isn't even in the same league.

So am I worried that it is "only" getting like a quarter of the entire session all to itself when it's roughly a thousandth as complex an issue? About as worried as I'd be if the entire nation devoted "only" 1% of their earnings to deposits into my personal bank account... that's about how worried that makes me.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. FWIW, I'm not "worried"
I'm skeptical that anything real is going to come of it in that kind of time frame.

Maybe I'll be proven wrong. I'll happily eat crow if that's the case. I'd really love for something to begin happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. YES we can when we want to...come on guys, just do it already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
14. Good. Let's finish this idiotic, bigoted law. The faster the better. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
16. Pentagon To Announce Some "Don't Ask" Details Next Week
Source: The Atlantic

Jan 28 2010, 2:16 pm by Marc Ambinder
Pentagon To Announce Some "Don't Ask" Details Next Week

Before President Obama announced last night that he would work with Congress and the Pentagon to end the military's ban on service by gays and lesbians, the White House consulted Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Adm. Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, to sign off on the language he planned to use, administration officials said. They did. "The Pentagon is with us," the official said. And Geoff Morell, Gates's spokesman, e-mails me to say that "The Department leadership is actively working on an implementation plan and will have more to say about it next week." So -- Obama's pledge to repeal Don't Ask, Don't Tell was more than words -- he's instructed the military to get it done as soon as Congress repeals the law. A Senate hearing is set for February 9.

Read more: http://politics.theatlantic.com/2010/01/pentagon_to_announce_some_dont_ask_details_next_week.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Very encouraging.
I hope he will also intervene as necessary to make sure NO MORE service members are discharged under DADT between now and the day it is repealed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Not that Congress will repeal it, of course; the senate lacks the necessary 120 votes
Also, wow does Angst's comment on that post ever win the Stupid Award for the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
21. Pentagon plan on 'don't ask, don't tell' ready for Congress
Source: CNN

Washington (CNN) -- Defense Secretary Robert Gates will unveil the Pentagon's plan to prepare for repealing the controversial "don't ask, don't tell" law regarding gay soldiers at a committee hearing Tuesday, a Pentagon spokesman said.

"The Defense Department leadership is actively working on an implementation plan and the secretary will have more to say about this next week," Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell said on Thursday.

President Obama said in his first State of the Union address Wednesday night that he would work with Congress and the Pentagon this year to repeal the law that prohibits military members from acknowledging openly that they are gay.

According to the Senate Web site, the Senate Armed Services Committee has scheduled an hour to discuss the issue at Tuesday's hearing on the fiscal year 2011 defense budget, which Gates will attend.



Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/28/gates.military.gay/index.html?eref=rss_politics&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+rss%2Fcnn_allpolitics+%28RSS%3A+Politics%29&utm_content=Twitter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. There, now, that wasn't so difficult, was it? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. So not difficult, in fact, one has to wonder why
it took a year to do it?

I guess better late than never, but. . . . okay, better late than never without the buts.




Tansy Gold
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Its already been a year actually
so its would be why does it take two years?

Equality California is pushing the issue too (and they should):

http://www.eqca.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?c=kuLRJ9MRKrH&b=5609563&content_id=%7B0A9F8576-3117-46DF-BF4F-4C819B5A83D1%7D¬oc=1

Equality California Urges President Obama to Repeal DADT Immediately

“We appreciate President Obama reiterating his commitment to repeal Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, but words do not end discrimination – actions do. We call on President Obama to immediately cease discharging openly lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender service members and to take a stand for equality in the military.” - Geoff Kors, Equality California

SAN FRANCISCO– Equality California called on President Obama to immediately end the discriminatory federal policy known as "Don't Ask, Don't Tell,” after the President reiterated his commitment to repeal DADT in his State of the Union address.

“We appreciate President Obama reiterating his commitment to repeal Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, but words do not end discrimination – actions do,” said Equality California Executive Director Geoff Kors. “We call on President Obama to immediately cease discharging openly lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender service members and to take a stand for equality in the military. Thousands of LGBT service members have bravely served our nation, and they deserve the same protections as all Americans. We urge President Obama and Congress to act swiftly to overturn this discriminatory policy.”

Equality California sponsored a resolution introduced by Senator Christine Kehoe (D-San Diego) that calls on the United States Congress to pass and President Barack Obama to immediately sign the Military Readiness Enhancement Act, which would end the unfair policy and allow gay, lesbian and bisexual Americans to serve openly in the armed forces. The resolution recently passed the State Assembly Judiciary Committee and is now on the Assembly floor.

"Don't Ask, Don't Tell" was first authorized in 1994. Since that time, more than 13,500 service members have been discharged under the policy, including more than 800 specialists serving in 'critical operations,' such as counterintelligence, medicine, and translation. According to a General Accounting Office report, 323 language specialists have been discharged, resulting in a critical shortage of qualified translators in intelligence gathering posts. Currently, 186 members of the U.S. House have signed on as co-sponsors to the Military Readiness Enhancement Act, which would repeal "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" and replace it with a policy of non-discrimination across the armed forces. Last year, 77 members of Congress sent a letter to President Obama requesting he immediately suspend discharges under the discriminatory policy.

More than 24 other nations currently allow gay, lesbian and bisexual individuals to serve openly in their militaries, including Canada and the United Kingdom, alongside whom American forces have served in combat. Recent public opinion polls show that a majority of both the American public and active service members believe the policy should be overturned and that gay and lesbian Americans should be allowed to serve openly in the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. Somehow, we defeated Germany and Japan in WWII without such a ban. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. Is this actually ever going to really happen . . . 20 years after Clinton???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. Public opinion on this issue - basically generational - has changed hugely in the past 20 yrs. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #21
29. Whatever the plan is I'm sure there's a big transfer of money to rich people in it.
Edited on Fri Jan-29-10 01:55 AM by salguine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
30. I'm not surprised, even when there is good news
people shit on it.

I mean why hasn't Obama fixed ALL the world's problems yet? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
32. This is a non-event. Before I cheer or boo, I'll wait to see what, if anything,
actually happens.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. They decided to wait and "study the problem" another year
that's what happened, even though the top military brass all agrees DADT needs to go, now.

The Congressmembers couldn't even agree on issuing a moratorium on releasing GLBT troops while they "study the problem".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC