Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama to incorporate GOP ideas in health plan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Cherchez la Femme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:05 PM
Original message
Obama to incorporate GOP ideas in health plan
Source: msnbc

Subheadline: "Announcement is not likely to win him any votes from Republicans"


WASHINGTON - President Barack Obama will incorporate Republican ideas on medical malpractice reform and trying to rid the health care system of waste and abuse in a revised proposal he hopes jump-starts his stalled overhaul drive, a Democratic official told The Associated Press on Tuesday.

Obama planned to send a letter to Democratic congressional leaders later in the day detailing his plan and make a statement at the White House on Wednesday.

A Democratic official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the White House had not released the letter, said the plan would include expanding the use of fraud investigators disguised as patients to uncover waste and abuse. The plan also would expand pilot programs on medical malpractice reform and would address health savings accounts and Medicaid providers.
Story continues below ↓advertisement | your ad here

Democratic sources have confirmed with NBC News that these four areas will be addressed by the president's letter. The president is also expected to tell Congress he supports a comprehensive approach and that he does not believe "piece meal" plan will work.

Obama's announcement is not likely to win him any votes from Republicans, who want Obama to tear up the existing bills and start over, but it could give wavering Democrats political cover by showing the party has been willing to compromise in the wake of last week's televised bipartisan health care summit.

~snip~

Read more: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35656271/ns/politics-health_care_reform/



Why is it that it is the Democrats who must compromise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lindsay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because the corporations
say so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obama is either naive or stupid for thinking that continual pandering to the GOP will actually work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Or, of course, he generally agrees with Republican positions. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
37. Shush.
That's not cleared for release.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. No, he hopes that we are naive or stupid enough to think he's actually one of us.
Obama is the world's biggest DINO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bend over for the GOP, and they still won't offer help. When will
Obama learn?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm not against Fraud protection and some malpractice reform just because the GOP likes it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Me either, but I don't like the idea of including anything concerning HSAs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArcticFox Donating Member (654 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. May I ask why are you not against it ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. Because we're the majority, silly.
:grr:









.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cherchez la Femme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
33. Ah, I see
Edited on Tue Mar-02-10 05:02 PM by Cherchez la Femme
just like the Republicans --the majority of that time-- of the last administration did noting but compromise to the Democrats? Like push through all their vileness, nevermind what the Democrats had to say; lock the Dems out of any input at all in their bloody and mercenary little plans
...right down to shutting out the lights on the Dems
--done within a government, hence owned by The People, building!

Ah, the power of the majority! OIYR :puke:

What I wouldn't give to see a quarter of the chutzpah and will of the 'pukes transfer, even by osmosis (which should be easy as they really are in bed with each other) into our Democratic elected officials.


By intimating, heck, saying the Democrats must compromise the perception that it is they who are not cooperating (cooperating for the GOOD of the people or being bipartisan for its own sake?);
when in actuality they are grabbing their ankles and begging for some, uh.... well I'll leave it to your imagination
and they don't even ask for lubricant. No, no Santorum for them!

Curiously our Party seems to like it, as they do this so frequently.


Sorry to be crude, but I've had enough of this shite.
If I wanted to be known as one of a group who are laughed at constantly, I'd have graduated from Clown College. There's a much easier way to achieve this; all one has to do is belong to the Democratic Party!
Speaking of which, the Democratic caucus seems to have morphed into the Professional Division of Clown College, irregardless of their (recent but dropping) power, mandate and general citizens approval of their stated, but never put into practice, 'ideals' -- if you could call them ideals anymore.


Edit: That subheadline (is that the term?) IS quite funny! I can just see the tongue sticking through the cheek of the article's author :lol:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #33
41. "THANK YOU SIR. MAY HAVE ANOTHER???!!!" The new DNC motto. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. "A Democratic official" = Rahm
Probably the latest round in the giant pissing match between him and the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. This is nice. It's compromise, without having to compromise



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. Start with a moderate Republican type plan, then make it more Republican?
Are we sure he's on our side?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Speaking for myself
I am beginning to have doubts that he was ever really on our side!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
31. You aren't alone. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
12. "We finally win power in the House, Senate and White House and we're sitting on our hands."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. if these guys were cops, they'd put serial killers in charge of investigating murders
and ask their advice for how to prosecute them.

Oh wait, they already do that with Wall Street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. We shall see!
Based on recent history, I predict that the compromise will include the removal of any workable means for those severely injured or killed by doctors and hospitals due to negligence under the moniker "tort reform", the ability for health insurers to "cross state lines" to find the most permissive state in terms of regulations and a general loosening of any remaining enforcement provisions in the bill. In short, the compromise will be the health insurance industry's wet dream. The Democrats will call the bill when they pass it with reconciliation a HUGE win and the GOP will still get the red meat they desperately need to feed their idiot constituents. At the end of the day, a bill that health insurers have only dreamed of will get passed by Democrats.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArcticFox Donating Member (654 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. And forum shopping by the insurers
A recent supreme court case has made it harder for plaintiffs to bring actions in state courts:

http://www.abajournal.com/weekly/article/supreme_court_adopts_headquarters_test_hampering_forum-shopping_plaintiffs

Please understand that the ABA leans toward the right, so when they say "hampering forum-shopping plaintiffs" what they really mean is "enabling forum-avoiding defendants."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subterranean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
14. It would be nice if he'd incorporate a public option while he's at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
32. No. THATS a "Democratic" Idea.
Obama only likes "Republican" ideas.

The whole Kabuki Theater from last week was just ANOTHER excuse for Obama to move even FURTHER to the RIGHT.

"By their works, you will know them".

BTW: Health Care Savings Accounts should SCARE any REAL Democrat.
It IS the first step in giving FICA money to Wall Street.


"There are forces within the Democratic Party who want us to sound like kinder, gentler Republicans. I want us to compete for that great mass of voters that want a party that will stand up for working Americans, family farmers, and people who haven't felt the benefits of the economic upturn."---Paul Wellstone



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArcticFox Donating Member (654 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
15. Stupid stupid stupid
It's like there's a rabid dog lurching at him and he knows throwing it a steak won't stop it from eating him alive, but he throws steak after steak after steak anyway just to show the rest of america that he was bending over backward to satisfy the dog. He doesn't realize that all the dog wants is a piece of HIS hide.

I have a big problem with medical malpractice reform. The jury system in this country worked fine for 200 years; courts and juries do a pretty good job of limiting damages already. The people with power and money in this country simply do a wonderful job publicizing the very rare instances where somebody ends up being overly compensated. (Notice I don't say "ending up better-off," because I wouldn't think any amount of money can make you better off if you have one less leg or can no longer eat solid foods).

I can't believe the dive this country has taken in my short thirty years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
17. Gay doctors will wear pink triangles...
and be required to wear a red flashing light and siren, so homophobic patients can choose not to be served by them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
18. Is there ANYTHING left of this package that is Democratic?? okay, no. of uninsured covered.


CBO said tort reform "anti-patient's rights" will only save about 1% to 2%.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phlem Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
21. What a bunch of losers.
How do we insure the folks we have in our party work for the people as we elect them. I'm sick and tired of politicians campaigning for us when they need to get elected and then doing an about face when they're actually in office. We're not going to get accountability from the R's, but how do we insure our own party's accountability. There should be zero conservaDems in our party.

-p
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Libertas1776 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
22. ...and nothing from his own party
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Altoid_Cyclist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
24. This has been posted before, but it bears repeating whenever "tort reform" is mentioned.
Get rid of the "Doctors" who have no business being allowed to practice and see how much that reduces costs to provide health care.

Do Democrats own a lot of stock in Johnson & Johnson? Because they seem to want to increase sales of K-Y Jelly every chance they get. Their stock goes up and the American public gets the K-Y politics of bi-partisanship.

This is from Public Citizen:

Excerpt:

The medical community has argued that medical liability litigation constitutes a giant "lottery," in which lawsuits are purely random events bearing no relationship to the care given by a physician. In reality, a small percentage of doctors are responsible for the bulk of malpractice in the United States, and better oversight by state medical boards could drastically reduce the damage they cause.

Public Citizen’s analysis of the National Practitioner Data Bank, which covers malpractice judgments and settlements since September 1990, found that about five percent of the doctors in the United States are responsible for half the malpractice. Specifically, 4.8 percent of doctors (40,118) have paid two or more malpractice awards to patients. These doctors are responsible for 51 percent of all the reports made to the Data Bank, and have paid out nearly $21 billion in damages, more than 53 percent of the total damages paid.

14,293 doctors, representing 1.7 percent of the doctors in the U.S., have made three or more payments, totaling $11 billion. These doctors are responsible for 27.5 percent of all malpractice awards.


Rest of article:
http://www.citizen.org/congress/civjus/medmal/articles.cfm?ID=8308
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
25. Why don't we just pass the repig plan? It covers 3 million people! That's better than nothing! No?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
26. Maybe this will finally make the Republicans love him! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cherchez la Femme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #26
35. Is it me, or
does that seem to be the only real item on the Obama agenda?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #35
43. It's not just you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paranoid Pessimist Donating Member (432 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
27. I Wish He Would Give Up on the Bipartisan Dream n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
28. Neither of those are terrible ideas.
Ineffective gimmicks, maybe, but not directly harmful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Unprincipled weakness and pandering to the right is always harmful. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
29. Twelve long years with a despicable, unprincipled, weak little man in the WH... eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlingBlade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
34. Drip, Drip, Drip ...Deja Vu All over again ...
They need to just come out and tell us what we already know

This IS the fucking GOP Health Care Reform idea short of just killing it outright
which in my opinion, As it stands now, Should be killed

Single Payer or Bust ya Corporate Whores !

K & R For TRUTH !
This earns a place in the ....
Democratic Party Suicide Prevention Thread
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x7814462
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
36. Game over.
Straw...meet camel's back.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
38. k
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
39. I hope we aren't going to make it easier for a doctor to sue you than for you to sue them
I don't consider that "reform".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
40. k
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
42. "to incorporate?"
Obama to incorporate GOP ideas in health plan

WHat's left? The bill, as it is, is already a creation of the republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scottsoperson Donating Member (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. germany does not allow you to sue doctors
very few lawsuits against doctors in britain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scottsoperson Donating Member (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. cbo says obamacare will bring down premiums a little...
and will cover 94% of americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scottsoperson Donating Member (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. the problem is not just the corporations...
most americans are afraid of change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC