Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Admiral Mullen: foreign policy is too dominated by the military

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 11:04 PM
Original message
Admiral Mullen: foreign policy is too dominated by the military
Source: CSM

The Pentagon’s top officer said the military cannot continue to do the bulk of the heavy lifting overseas, and it’s time for the State Department and other agencies to step up.

Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Wednesday evening that there are limits to American military power and diplomatic efforts must be just as important if not more so. But despite recognition of this, the military has become the default for American foreign policy.

“It’s one thing to be able and willing to serve as emergency responders, quite another to always have to be the fire chief,” Mullen said in prepared remarks at Kansas State University.

Read more: http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Military/2010/0303/Admiral-Mullen-foreign-policy-is-too-dominated-by-the-military
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dyedinthewoolliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Stop the fucking presses!
Edited on Wed Mar-03-10 11:07 PM by Dyedinthewoolliberal
No shit Sherlock...........
comments made to Mullen not the OP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yet another reason it's good to have a bubblehead as Top Cat. Thanks Sec. Gates! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 05:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Admiral Mullen is a black shoe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I stand corrected. I thought those were dolphins on the photograph. It's interesting how Gates
Edited on Thu Mar-04-10 08:27 AM by Captain Hilts
gave so many appointments directly involved in the Iraq Wars to admirals and cleaned a lot of generals out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Unusual, Mullen was promoted to CJCS and
another black shoe was promoted to CNO. Been a very long time since two surface admirals were consecutive CNO's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeresyLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good man.
I hope someone listens to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyy1998 Donating Member (984 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Agreed
Very pleasantly surprised by this. Obviously this doesn't mean the military industry complex will end very soon, but maybe they will see a decline in their role in the future. You do see the State Department under Hillary playing a much bigger role in foreign affairs. I have a lot of friends from overseas(Europe and Asia) and they love Obama and they think highly of Hillary Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. The State Department had been completely demoralized under Bush with Powell and Rice.
Rice tried to make something of it, but 100 times zero is still zero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyy1998 Donating Member (984 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. That's very true. But it seems like Hillary is doing a good job in
reasserting the role of the State Department in global affairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PacerLJ35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. A very true statement
Ever since the end of the Cold War, the US military has been THE foreign policy tool. This needs to end, IMO. There are times and places for military action, but it seems the military gets deployed far too often for nearly anything and everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
6. It's not like State willfully shirked, or dropped a ball.
Edited on Thu Mar-04-10 02:20 AM by snot
Many career diplomats resigned in protest against the invasion of Iraq and other Bush policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 03:19 AM
Response to Original message
7. "...the military has become the default for American foreign policy!" Hear! Hear!
What ever happened to "war is last resort"?

What ever happened to the "peace dividend"?

What ever happened to our Founders' opposition--and many generations' opposition--to the U.S. maintaining a standing army?

Wasn't this one of the reasons for the American Revolution? That the colonists were forced to quarter British troops in their homes? We aren't forced to do that, exactly, but how many military personnel are we being forced to support--housing, food, training, equipment, medical care and other individual and family benefits--by paying taxes under threat of serious penalty? And how many military bases worldwide? And how much fuel at inflated prices? And how many fighter jets, spy planes, bombers, drones, aircraft carriers, tanks, armored vehicles, guns, bullets, bombs, missiles and God knows what all? And how many pilots? And how many technicians and engineers? And how many "special ops" teams? And how many mercenaries? And how many spies, and psyops teams, and P.R. firms? And on and on and on!

The war budget should be cut by 90%, down to a true defensive posture. All U.S. troops should be brought home and demobilized, and all these military bases worldwide shut down! We don't need 90% of what we are spending on war and militarism to defend our shores, or to join UN-sanctioned necessary peacekeeping missions. It is the worst kind of tyranny--and that is WHY our Founders opposed a standing army. They knew what the temptations would be.

Until we can join with others to institute world disarmament, we probably need some defense, but defense is certainly not what is happening now. When was the last time the Pentagon actually defended us? They couldn't even defend our nation's capitol on 9/11! No, what is happening now are wars of aggression--wars for resources, corporate wars--that have absolutely nothing to do with defending us from attack. Even if you buy the official 9/11 story, that it was Saudi Arabians and Yemenis who attacked us on 9/11, what the hell are we doing killing scores of Afghan civilians every week? We are occupying three countries right now--Iraq, which has nothing to do with 9/11, Afghanistan, where 99% of the people had nothing to do with 9/11 and Colombia, which has a long border with another Pentagon oil target--Venezuela.

The new U.S./Colombia military agreement includes U.S. military use of SEVEN bases in Colombia--three on the Venezuelan border--U.S. military use of ALL civilian airports and other infrastructure, U.S. fighter and spy planes and their pilots, U.S. Navy ships and their crews (at the ports), and (if you can believe this number) 1,600 U.S. soldiers and U.S. 'contractors'--hauntingly described as "just a few military advisers--with total diplomatic immunity for all U.S. military personnel and 'contractors,' no matter what they do in Colombia. Tell me what this occupation of Colombia is really FOR! And that is by no means the total picture of U.S. war assets now surrounding Venezuela's oil coast and northern oil provinces.

The temptations are overwhelming--with all this great war machine at the service of those who really run this country--the corporate rulers. We have come to the nether end of the American Revolution and are now committing every mistake that our Founders tried to prevent us from making--from maintaining not just a "standing army," but a huge war machine, worldwide, to an imperial presidency--probably inevitable with the dawn of nuclear weapons, but still, the president was not meant to be a king, let alone the king of the world--to corporations living forever, accumulating vast wealth and power, acquiring "human rights," and dominating all decisions just like the British East India Company!

The problems of undoing these anti-democratic horrors seem overwhelming, but in that case, you've got to take a step by step approach, addressing the first steps to very practical considerations of power. Where does our power as a people reside? It resides mostly in our vote. Who counts our votes? Not us any more. No, we now have a handful of private, rightwing corporations 'counting' all our votes with 'TRADE SECRET' programming code and virtually no audit/recount controls--and one of them, ES&S, just bought out Diebold and now has an 85% monopoly on U.S. voting systems, and they are the worst of the lot--worse even than Diebold--as to far rightwing connections. Changing this is DOABLE. The power over selecting voting systems still resides at the state/local level where ordinary people still have some potential influence. The person who makes those decisions--your county registrar--may live right down the street from you. And for most Americans, the state capitol is not that far away. We cannot reform anything else until we restore vote counting that everyone can see and understand, and can guarantee, through transparency, that the people we vote for in primaries and general elections are the people who take office. This is so obvious that it is difficult to explain. Transparent vote counting is the most fundamental condition for democracy. It has been taken away. We must get it back. We MUST! And until we do, corporations and war profiteers are going to run us, not the other way around, as it should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's What Dwight D. Eisenhower warned us of
the results of a military industrial complex in need of business, and their business is weaponry for wars. No wars, no profits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
13. they need to jusitfy their budget
and protect it from any suicidal legislator who would challenge its bankrupting scale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC