Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Tells Liberals Public Option Doesn’t Have Votes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 07:03 PM
Original message
Obama Tells Liberals Public Option Doesn’t Have Votes
Source: The Plum Line

The Plum LineGreg Sargent's blog
Posted at 03/04/2010, 05:37 PM EST
Obama Tells Liberals Public Option Doesn’t Have Votes

* In a private meeting at the White House this afternoon, Obama told a roomful of House Dems he doesn’t think the votes are there to pass the public option, and urged them to take the long view and to support the Senate bill as merely the beginning of reform, Dem Rep Lynn Woolsey tells me.

Also: Obama thanked the assembled, mostly liberals, for their ongoing insistence from the left over the months that the bill be improved, Woolsey says. “He thanked us,” she recalled. “He said the bill wouldn’t have been nearly as good as it is if we hadn’t advocated.”

Woolsey, the co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, who was present with around seven or eight other liberals, says Obama compared the health reform fight to the passage of Social Security and Medicare.

“He was very clear: He thought this was as good as it’s going to get,” Woolsey said, referring to the plan to pass the Senate bill and fix it via reconciliation.



Read more: http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/terrorism/obama-tells-liberals-public-option-doesnt-have-votes/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. This story is not reliable
Sounds a little too kiss and tell to be taken seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I find the plumline to be quite authentic
and Sargent is a careful journalist. Of course I want confirmation, but I would bet this is accurate to the event.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sub Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. 'Liberal' this and 'liberal' that. Sounds biased to me.
:twocents:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. He met with them
It sounds like what he would tell them, because it's true. The votes in the senate aren't there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Let me be very Clear. Bull$hit. I demand The passage of MEdicare part E for EVERYONE NOW.
I do not give a fuck who believes it can or can not pas. I demand an up or down vote. Lets' find out who is on our side and who is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. If it doesn't have the votes,
Why doesn't it, since the people definitely want the public option?

In fact, why not just bite the bullet and go with single payer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Absolutely, Single Payer, Universal Health Care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
30. "I understand some countries may already have it."
I heard that rumor somewhere too. Can't be true, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. So which tool of the health industry is now campaigning against Public option?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
32. Which tool? About half of the Democratic Party.
The bought half.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. Neither will Obama in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
d_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. ^^
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissDeeds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. Just what I was thinking n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swilton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
24. ++100
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
t0dd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
29. yep.. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
44. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golddigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #7
47. +14, the number of my family members!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
48. No credibility, no votes..
.. Obama must really think we are all stupid.

It didn't have the votes because you made sure it didn't, sir.

Please, only the folks not paying attention haven't seen through your inspiring speeches to the complete and utter lack of action behind them.

The bankster bailout were enough to make you a one-termer, you'd think that since you're already dead in the water you'd try to accomplish SOMETHING in your term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zenj8 Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. It has the American people's vote
but I guess the America where Representatives and Senators actually represent the people instead of corporations is a thing of the past. Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #8
43. Obama has the bully pulpit and a way with words that no one else has
he could pass anything he truly wants but he doesn't want this and fuck us all. 2012, may it either end in apocalypse or in the election of someone with a pair. this guy? Not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. Huffington Post article gave a different take on this:
Of those, only Kucinich voted no, but Christensen and Bordallo don't have a vote on the House floor. None of the members, including Kucinich, indicated that they would vote any differently this time around. "I think left the meeting leaving the impression with the president that he's a no-go," said Schakowsky.

But, said one attendee, Obama pointed Kucinich toward single-payer language that Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) was able to get into the bill. Kucinich fought for an amendment that would allow states to adopt single-payer systems without getting sued by insurance companies. Obama told Kucinich that Sanders's measure was similar but doesn't kick in for several years. "He definitely wrote it down," said one member of Kucinich, suggesting that he'd look into it.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/04/obama-to-progressives-thi_n_486426.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Very interesting, thanks for the information. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
12. The very least America deserves is transparency, seeing who votes for and against a public option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
53. Abso-frikkin-lutely. Obama and Reid got to stop protecting those who are
not in support of the PO and give out their names.

You notice once http://whipcongress.com/ started to show all those in support, the bulls eyes started to shine brighter on exactly who didn't support it. This made them VERY VERY nervous (them being Reid and the WH), they started taking action right away so people wouldn't get the list of names not supporting it. They need to show those not in support of it because Dem's need to know this. It is the least they can do if they are going to screw us over with the Senate bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
RogueBandit Donating Member (168 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
16. There can be more than one vote!
What's wrong with making the vote on public option? If it doesn't' pass then make the next vote.

I think there's something wrong with the reporting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
17. "thanked (them) for their ongoing insistence"
First, this isn't LBN and will be alerted.

Nevertheless, this made me laugh:

Obama thanked the assembled, mostly liberals, for their ongoing insistence from the left over the months that the bill be improved, Woolsey says. “He thanked us,” she recalled. “He said the bill wouldn’t have been nearly as good as it is if we hadn’t advocated.”

I wonder if "the assembled, mostly liberals" thanked Obama for his lack of support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
18. It doesn't have the votes
but just how much arm twisting has he done to get these votes? He sure caved on mandates pretty quickly and wouldn't even allow the vote on drug reimportation until he twisted enough arms to make it fail. Once again progressives have to be the ones to give in or it will fail, it never reads the other way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crowman1979 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
19. Public Option doesn't have votes = Obama can forget about votes in 2012
Milk that single term for all it's worth, because you can in the words of the Sopranos FUHGHETABOUTIT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bkozumplik Donating Member (391 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. oh I think he knows he's done (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
20. if it doesn't kill the bill and go with single payer medicare or what congress has or say goodbye to
all your jobs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lifelong Protester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
23. Can we just quit 'saying' it doesn't have the votes and VOTE?
I want it voted on (as I guess many here do) and I THEN want to find out who would not vote for it. I am sick of this 'forgone conclusion' thinking.

UP OR DOWN, VOTE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stranger81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
25. It doesn't have the votes b/c Obama won't expend the political capital to support it.
This is just more of the same directed at progressives -- STFU & get in line.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoeyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
26. Military spending, more spying on Americans, and more money for criminals
didn't have the votes either, but he was sure as shit willing to send out the attack dogs to make the liberals get in line.
It's all about priorities. If he isn't fighting for a better bill it's because he doesn't want one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
27. Obama doing what he does best: surrendering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stumbler Donating Member (599 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
28. From this "liberal" to Obama:
I wanted Medicare for all. You said 'no.'
I wanted at least a public option. You still said 'no.'
I wanted advocates of both to have at least a seat at the table. You said 'no.'
I wanted us to strong-arm our way through Republican opposition. You said 'no.'
I want(ed) you to end your call for "bipartisanship." You said (& still say) 'no.'

After 8 years of an administration who routinely told me 'no,' I "hoped" you'd be different. After spending hours campaigning for you, and waiting in line for over an hour, I "hoped" you'd be different.

But your endless calls for "bipartisanship" while sacrificing your base has yielded you what, exactly? I'll tell you one thing you've reaped: When you ask for my vote come 2012, guess what I'll be saying.... (Hint: Starts w/ 'N' and ends w/ 'O')
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
31. we were....
....a few votes short of 60....now we're a few votes short of 50....except for war and corporate bailouts, we always seem to be a few votes short....it must be new math....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlingBlade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
33. More BullShit from the BullShit King !
Edited on Thu Mar-04-10 09:48 PM by SlingBlade
Don't ask but TELL them and Tell them we will hold them accountable.

Call, Write, Fax and E-mail OUR Representatives
Now, Today and tomorrow and everyday that remains
Tell them that we demand Single Payer NOW, Not ten years from now.

Contact the White House
http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact

Call the White House
(202) 456-1111

Call, Write, Fax and E-mail your Representatives, House and Senate
http://www.contactingthecongress.org /

There my very well never be another chance. Do it before they pull the trigger.
Do it for your children and your loved ones, Just do it.

K & R
This one joins its neighbors at ...
The Democratic Party Suicide Prevention Thread
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x7764365
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
34. Obama doesn't want the public option, he never did.
Remember, he is the one who said early on in these 'negotiations' that it was 'not that important'.

It is now up to Congress. The votes will be there if the people let Congress know that they will pay a price if they do not start working for the people who elected them.

Forget the WH, they are working for the Insurance Industry. I know, so is Congress, but elections are coming up in the Fall, and they are far more in danger of losing their jobs than the president at this point.

I am so disgusted with this administration at this point. If we had a president who wanted Single Payer and who refused to have secret meetings with private insurance lobbyists, we would have have it. There will never again be a more perfect situation to get it than there was in January of 2009. We lost the opportunity because the party we supported didn't want what we wanted. It really is that simple.

I do NOT buy the 'no votes' excuse and never will. Leadership is what we don't have, NOT votes. Good leaders get votes. Obama already said, he got 95% of what he wanted in the Senate Bill. Had he wanted a PO, we'd have it.

Why is anyone paying any attention to what he says anymore? Pressure Congress, forget the WH. They already forgot who elected them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scentopine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
35. they've been grooming us for failure since day one - I call Bullshit
Obama cut deals with the money bags and that's why single payer is dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
36. Oh? And how do votes get made?
That's the REAL question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
37. Snake oil salesman, that's what Obama has turned out to be!
We voted for transformational change, and we ended up with another corrupt Chicago politician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
39. It didn't have the President. Agreement was made in advance with insurers and big Pharma
Matt Taibbi warned us early on that the fix was in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
droidamus2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
40. How about this
Since Obama is pushing for an up or down vote on 'his bill' I think the liberal/progressive caucus should insist on an up or down vote on the strong public option. Even if it has to be done as a separate bill. Make all those Democrats and obviously all the Republicans stand up and say no to the public option. If they think the public is so against it they should have no problem making their stance known.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
41. Well, GET THE VOTES. It's called LEADERSHIP. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
42. Meh. more kabuki theater. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
45. No We Can't get the change We The People voted for,
because We The People aren't important enough, not like those who can pay the payola.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 03:59 AM
Response to Original message
46. So, it's business as usual
Except now we're mandated to purchase a product from a private company.

Gee, can I get that same deal for my business? It would certainly help me employ more people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
49. Well, when he threw Single Payer under the bus last year, it didn't help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
50. Gee President Obama, IF you would of had the courage to place "Single Payer" on the
negotiation table from the START, we might have been able to get a "Robust Public Option" in play by now.

I'm NOT buying this charade. :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
51. Enjoy your ONE TERM Mr. Coward. Thank Rahm for your downfall.
Though, I ultimately hold you responsible for your own failure. After all, you are the one who decided to abandon your campaign message for that of your twisted DLC whore, Rahm. You are the one who frittered away the health care debate by positioning yourself such that a public option was never really viable and only used to placate the grassroots.

F' You, Mr. President.

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
52. NAME THE DEMS WHO WON'T SUPPORT IT !!!!!
Because we don't support them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC