Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sen. Levin moves to block Blackwater’s $1 billion Afghanistan contract

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 11:05 PM
Original message
Sen. Levin moves to block Blackwater’s $1 billion Afghanistan contract
Source: Raw Story/AP

Sen. Levin moves to block Blackwater’s $1 billion Afghanistan contract

By The Associated Press
Thursday, March 4th, 2010 -- 9:43 pm

carllevin Sen. Levin moves to block Blackwaters $1 billion Afghanistan contractA senior Senate Democrat said Thursday the Pentagon should consider barring Blackwater, now called Xe Services, from a new $1 billion deal to train Afghan police because of "serious questions" about the contractor's conduct.

The comments by Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin suggests thinning patience in Congress for the Pentagon's heavy reliance on contractors on the battlefield.

U.S. efforts to rebuild Iraq and Afghanistan using independent contractors has been a boon for companies like Blackwater and saved money and time for the Defense Department, whose forces are busy in combat.

But the outsourcing has made it more difficult for military commanders to control what happens on the battlefield.

Read more: http://rawstory.com/2010/03/sen-levin-moves-block-blackwaters-1-billion-afghanistan-contract/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes!
Good news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Are Xe employees subject to U.S. law for crimes they commit in Afghanistan? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ro1942 Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's about time
Our Defence Dept. is shameful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
18. "our?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Rahm is behind funding these criminals
Nothing happens with out his greasy little fingers massaging the Green $$$$$$
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
19. while i know Rahm is quite disliked on here
but is there any proof of this accusation, or are you just making statements drawn only from your mind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I am drawing on the ignore button
Adios
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Now thats impressive, I ask a simple question and I gets ignored.
Edited on Sat Mar-06-10 01:28 PM by Bodhi BloodWave
*shrugs* Oh well, no skin off my back since it answers my question quite well i guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArcticFox Donating Member (654 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. " saved money and time for the Defense Department"???
I doubt that very much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. I approve of this. Go, Senator Levin!
Rewarding those murderers for electrocuting our soldiers is obscene.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 04:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. +1
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. Once again, Levin makes me proud.
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanonRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
9. Finally somebody with stones
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
10. Yes! And PLEASE end this waste of money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
11. Bandaid. Red meat for the less-informed anti-war left.
Politically popular, perhaps, but does little ... What about the other four contractors who are also bidding for this billion-dollar gig? Are they really to be "trusted" more than Xe?

Congress needs to end the policy of using private contractors in any capacity for tasks that could be performed by military or civilian government personnel. I'm not talking about the truck drivers or sanitation experts, I'm talking about anything these private security companies want to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I Doubt It Will Hold for 24 Hours, Even
Carl is a sell-out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. MY Senator!!! AND his brother now chairs House Ways & Means!
I :loveya: Michigan!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northofdenali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
14. Has our damn military learned NOTHING from Iraq?
Edited on Fri Mar-05-10 03:23 PM by northofdenali
Go, Sen. Levin!!! This contract killers should NEVER be given taxpayer money.

Edited to add (from Vanity Fair):

As Adam Ciralsky observed in the January 2010 issue of Vanity Fair, Blackwater may have changed its name in an attempt at a P.R. makeover—the company is now cryptically called Xe—but that has not quite helped it stay under the radar, as founder Erik Prince surely hoped it would. Quite the contrary: Blackwater has been all over the headlines last week and this week for a number of developments. Two of these should come as relief to the company, however. First of all, Blackwater dodged a bullet last week when charges accusing it of wrongdoing in the 2007 Nisour Square shooting in Baghdad were dismisse by a judge. And this week, it was reported that Blackwater has settled a series of federal lawsuits, brought by Iraqis, accusing of it using excessive force in Iraq, including in Nisour Square. But the third development is likely to renew scrutiny of the secretive defense contractor: The New York Times today reports that two of the C.I.A. agents killed in last week's suicide bombing in Afghanistan were Blackwater employees.


http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2010/01/blackwater-still-making-ripples.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northofdenali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
15. I just found another interesting Blackwater article:
Blackwater Took 100's of Guns from U.S. Military, Afghan Police

Senate Inquiry Shows Contractor Signed for Rifles Using 'South Park' Alias

Employees of the CIA-connected private security corporation Blackwater diverted hundreds of weapons, including more than 500 AK-47 assault rifles, from a U.S. weapons bunker in Afghanistan intended to equip Afghan policemen, according to an investigation by the Senate Armed Services Committee. On at least one occasion, an individual claiming to work for the company evidently signed for a weapons shipment using the name of a “South Park” cartoon character. And Blackwater has yet to return hundreds of the guns to the military.


http://washingtonindependent.com/77476/blackwater-the-senate-and-south-park
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Yea, he signed it Eric Cartman. I just don't understand why
it's taking so long to cut this company & others like them out of our treasury. I guess knowing the right people & where the bodies are buried helps.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
17. Go, Carl, go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warm regards Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
20. It doesn't sound very convincing to me. "Consider," is the key word.
"A senior Senate Democrat said Thursday the Pentagon should consider barring Blackwater, now called Xe Services, from a new $1 billion deal to train Afghan police because of "serious questions" about the contractor's conduct."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
21. Good! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kgnu_fan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
24. whatever takes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
25. Kick
End these contracts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
26. Mercenaries are leeches, tapeworms and loose cannons all rolled in to one.
The use of mercenaries should be outlawed, there is no legitimate, logical reason; to have them, only a short sighted, cynical political motivation can account for tolerating them.

I'm sorry to have missed this one, it's too late to recommend.

Thanks for the thread, kpete.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC