Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Senator) Grassley: White House Staff Should Enroll in Exchanges

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 03:42 PM
Original message
(Senator) Grassley: White House Staff Should Enroll in Exchanges
Source: NY Times

Senator Charles E. Grassley, Republican of Iowa, said on Monday that he would propose legislation requiring President Obama and White House officials to obtain their health insurance through the new government exchanges that will be established under the health care bill that Mr. Obama is planning to sign on Tuesday.

Mr. Grassley succeeded in winning adoption of an amendment to the Senate bill that would require members of Congress and their staffs to obtain insurance through the new exchanges, rather than through the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program that they currently use.

“It’s pretty unbelievable that the president and his closest advisors remain untouched by the reforms they pushed for the rest of the country,” Mr. Grassley said in a statement. “In other words, President Obama’s health care reform won’t apply to President Obama.”

He added, “There’s no justification for the double standard, and I’ll continue to work to establish fairness.”

Read more: http://prescriptions.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/22/grassley-white-house-staff-should-enroll-in-exchanges/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, I'd be all for the entire federal government having to do that
it would be a very fitting sort of justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. As much as I don't like Grassley, and hope anything he proposes fails...
Edited on Mon Mar-22-10 04:09 PM by hughee99
What's the problem? The exchanges are supposed to provide good health care at reasonable costs, aren't they? Does anyone oppose good health care for government employees?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
icee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. I really don't see what difference it would make. If Obama signed
Edited on Mon Mar-22-10 07:41 PM by icee
up for health insurance on the exchange, he will still get whatever he wants from the insurance--because he is President. Now if Granny Doe signs up on the exchange, she will be treated slightly to majorly different. That's simply the way it is. People in our society are not always treated the same at Doctor's offices. To do this, Obama's doctor would have to be registered with the exchange's IP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whats_a_zip Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #27
53. It could make a difference to others.
It wouldn't make a difference for Obama, or Biden, or even Pelosi.
But it WOULD make a difference for the average Congressperson and their staff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
icee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #53
59. Not even at that level. Below that, I'll go along with your answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
29. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
43. One of the arguments
Was that we will finally get the same coverage that Congress receives. So why not put all federal employees into the system?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. great idea. It would be the fastest way to correct problems w/in the system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Federal Employees do something very similar already
Read about Federal Employees Health Benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
34. EXACTLY, that's what I was going to write, and may do so to grassley.
damn the repugs! (and I haven't said that very often, but I suspect they're going to be REALLLLLY obnoxious now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
60. Fucking grassley is just grandstanding llike the hypocrite
he is..he's already taking credit for contributing to the HCR in a press release today.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=433x244651
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Second hughee's idea!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. The exchanges are similar to the FEHB. Both have several
insurance companies with similar plans, compete for our business. They also have to conduct themselves ethically or will be kicked out of the pool. I bet it is the FEHB repackaged with a different name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. It would be interesting watching them trying to squirm out of it, wouldn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. Most of them up there...
have more than enough money to afford it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
35. That's what 'we' govt employees do, already, fyi.
We are all members of a very large 'exchange,' and it works very well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. and it is run by the OPM which will be running the exchanges
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #39
45. I fergit; IS it OPM?
At least, a separate office, and they'll need to increase their employee base to run 'new' exchanges, I expect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Yes OPM
and no they won't have to have a huge increase - they already do the same function for federal employees.

Here is the link to the exchanges they already have for federal employees http://www.opm.gov/insure/health/search/plansearch.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. Thanks, never looked at it that way.
I was a fed ée, still married to one, so have used fehb for 30+ years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #49
52. So you must be CSRS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #52
58. Yes, I'm an 'old' retiree, doing ok.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #35
63. I belong to the FEHB trough my union. I'm retired but I
am still able to participate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
62. The Federal Employee Health Benefit plan is what one
could consider an exchange. Most likely the exchanges were modelled after the FEHB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. They ought to put lifetime limits on farm subsidies. Just like welfare.
Charles Grassley and his family are welfare queens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Really Mr. Grassley?
Aren't you the same scumfuck who told someone that they'd have to work in a government job to get the same insurance as government officials get?

Fuck off, go to hell, and go fuck yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
61. that sums it up for me too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Pure busywork. This is going to backfire on Grassley like everything else the GOP has tried.
What an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BunkerHill24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Fools like Grassley is why I support term limits. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moosepoop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. I guess Grassley opposes the idea that
"If you like the health insurance you already have, you can keep it."

Will he insist that all citizens give up the insurance they already have, even if they like it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. Uh, Chuckie, the president doesn't have a medical insurance policy per se,
he simply has a doctor on staff and free access to medical care at government facilities as a perk of the job, which can be quite dangerous and occasionally result in death.

You want him to have to pay premiums and make appointments and such WHILE HE IS PRESIDENT???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. Yes. And he does make appointments. Usually the Prez goes to Walter Reed.
I would imagine he doesn't have to "wait" for an appointment and there is a Doctor on the WH staff but he should still have to pay premiums and be covered like the rest of us. He will still receive special attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #23
66. actually, usually he goes to Bethesda Naval for anything more serious than a regular visit
there's not a lot of traditional medicine that goes on at Walter Reed anymore, it's more of a rehab facility for wounded soldiers. There is a basic medical clinic inside the White House, with at least five doctors on staff (a civilian in charge and four military docs, one from each branch) for anything that your local doctor's office can't handle, Bethesda Naval is right up the road.

and no, he shouldn't have to pay premiums for himself (perhaps his family) the President's health is quite literally a matter of national security. Just as active duty military personnel don't pay premiums for TriCare, neither should the President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. What a jackass...
Mr. GrASSley, you piss me off and I hate you.

There...said it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhill926 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. perhaps all Americans could instead have.....
the same access to healthcare as Mr. Grassley.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Indeed. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Optimistic Donating Member (139 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
15. I agree, but in addition
All elected officials should have that, also they should give up their pensions and only get Social Security, All the retired politicians should have to pay back all the money they got in pensions too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
16. Hey Chuck
Eat shit and bark at the Moon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. I thought he already did such!
Edited on Mon Mar-22-10 07:31 PM by Plucketeer
Grassley's just ONE MORE corporate shill. Nothing more - nothing less. :dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
18. Isn't there federal law that prohibits reducing or increasing the President's salary
Edited on Mon Mar-22-10 06:23 PM by LiberalFighter
and other benefits during their term of office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
19. As long as they raise their co-pays to what
everybody else has, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Itchinjim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
20. Once again this Iowan must say:
Fuck Chuck.
Sorry about him and Steve King everybody. They really are not a good representation of the majority of Iowans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q3JR4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
21. Huh. This is interesting...

Mr. Grassley succeeded in winning adoption of an amendment to the Senate bill that would require members of Congress and their staffs to obtain insurance through the new exchanges, rather than through the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program that they currently use.


Is that amendment now the law of the land with the house vote?

Q3JR4.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q3JR4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Call me crazy but
that makes me a bit more optimistic. Too bad we have to wait 4 years for them to come online...

Q3JR4.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moosepoop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. Not crazy at all.
Apparently even Grassley sees the exchanges as a better deal than he has now, since he insisted on switching to them himself if the legislation were to pass. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
22. I actually like this idea.Why shouldn't they be required to join?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
31. once again chuckles the clown proves he has shit for brains
federal employees have a choice unlike the people who have employer insurance or no insurance at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #31
48. The point is there shouldn't be one set of laws for government and another for plebes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost-in-FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
32. Wasting time in such petty resolutions. What a f____ng shame! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarLeftFist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
33. Chuck 'Death Panels' Grassley?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
36. I'm agreeing w/ a Republican. Weird. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
37. Well I would hope the next time Mr. Grassley and his ilk vote for a war
They will either enlist or send their children to fight as well. If he's concerned about people not being touched by the reforms and policies they advocated and pass. That sounds right to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nightrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
38. knr. and they should have to pay for all costs out of pocket, as if
they were buying an individual plan. Fair is fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
40. What an idiot - they are

1)The exchanges will be run by OPM which does the same for Federal Employees

q) Part IV of subtitle D of title I of this Act is
19 amended by adding at the end the following:
20 ‘‘SEC. 1334. MULTI-STATE PLANS.
21 ‘‘(a) OVERSIGHT BY THE OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
22 MANAGEMENT.—
23 ‘‘ (1) IN GENERAL.— The Director of the Office
24 of Personnel Management (referred to in this section
25 as the ‘Director’) shall enter into contracts with

snip

7 (at) least 2 multi-State qualified health plans through
8 each Exchange in each State. Such plans shall pro9
vide individual, or in the case of small employers,
10 group coverage.



2) This is what their exchange, run by the OPM does


http://www.opm.gov/insure/health/search/plansearch.aspx


Its just unbelievable that this guy was involved in the negotiations for months.

He doesn't understand even the basics of the bill.

A complete idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #40
55. No one ever accused Grassley of being all that bright. Besides, Obama
has plenty of money. It wouldn't effect him no matter what in any way. It is a complete waste of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
41. You first, douchebag.
It's pretty unbelievable that Mr. Assley (sic) remains untouched by the PROBLEMS he INSISTs remain in place with absolutely no solution for 45,000 Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blacksheep214 Donating Member (682 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
42. You don't suppose
the POTUS would have free medical as a perc of the job?

Grassley is a dick who scares older citizens.

What type of jerk keeps voting for this turd?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
44. Why is anyone at the NYT paying attention to drivel like this?
Edited on Tue Mar-23-10 07:12 AM by No Elephants
Every time a Republican farts, it gets more media coverage than the two plus wars* in which America's sons and daughters are currently engaged.

When did our nation's priorities get this upside down? And why do we get caught up in it, instead of putting a stop to it?



*O.k., technically, they are not wars, but people still die and get injured every week, and they still cost a frickin' fortune, no matter what they are technically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
martymar64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
46. Martymar1964: Chuck Grassley should go fuck himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
50. Grassly Should Drop His Federal Healthcare. Put His Money Where His Mouth Is....
Also, as Grassley knows, the exchanges won't be in effect until 2014.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
51. Agree ... every Ameican should have the same health care . . .
no INCOME TESTING, no RISK POOLS -- just preventive care and necessary care.

I'm also encouraged that this bill is doing more to bring preventive care to America

without extra charge to the patient.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
54. first thing I've agreed with Grassley on, ever---all of Congress, WH staff, POTUS, SCOTUS, etc.
should have the same health care we do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #54
56. But they won't. They, on average, make way more money then we do and Grassley knows this.
Edited on Wed Mar-24-10 10:20 AM by Jennicut
It would not effect them in any way. The Senate is made up of tons of millionaires. A change in the way the exchanges are run for their health plans is not going to hurt a millionaire. Or someone making six figures. It is a political gimmick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #56
67. true, but their staff, as a general rule, aren't
and it's the staff who really run the show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DatManFromNawlins Donating Member (640 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #54
57. Even if they made that change
They STILL wouldn't have the same health care we do.

The master stroke of this entire mess was that the politicians were able to conflate health care and health insurance.

Quality health care is and will continue to be too expensive for the average American.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
64. Grassley should do so as well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
65. Why stop there, Chuckles?
If it's good enough for us, it's good enough for ALL federal employees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC