Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US senator slams delay in release of China currency report

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 09:15 PM
Original message
US senator slams delay in release of China currency report
Source: Times of India

AFP, Apr 5, 2010, 02.36am IST

WASHINGTON: A prominent US lawmaker scolded President Barack Obama's administration today for delaying the release of a report that could declare China a currency manipulator and lead the way to trade sanctions.

"We have a real problem with the Chinese. They are very shrewd and customarily they outmanoeuvre us," said Democratic senator Arlen Specter, one of many American lawmakers clamouring for China to revalue its overpriced yuan.

"They take our jobs. They take our money and then they lend it back to us and own a big part of America," Specter told the "Fox News Sunday" television show, adding: "I'm not too happy about a delay."

US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner on Saturday delayed a semi-annual report scheduled for April 15 that could have declared that China was manipulating the value of its yuan, paving the way for trade sanctions.

The delay was widely expected after China said President Hu Jintao would visit Washington for an April 12-13 summit on nuclear security.



Read more: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/US-senator-slams-delay-in-release-of-China-currency-report/articleshow/5761265.cms
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Chinese don't "take" our jobs. We GIVE them to them. BIG difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SocialistLez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. +1
It is very interesting to hear a Senator say they "take our jobs."
Where I live, it's very common to hear people blame illegal immigrants and say "they take our jobs."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Northerner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. +1
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. They take our jobs.
They engage in unfair trade practices.

They do not enforce environmental standards, allow free labor unions or permit their currency to naturally and freely rise in value in the currency market. They undercut the prices of products we produce by failing to regulate toxic substances (remember Chinese drywall and poisoned pet food?) and by suppressing the natural pressure from workers for higher wages and better working conditions. On top of all of that, they control their currency so that it is not traded freely in the market.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. +1111
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gilpo Donating Member (601 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. We let them take the jobs......in our sick addiction to buying their cheap crap.
we look the other way at all of the environmental, labor and fiscal abuse. no one is forcing us to shop at walmart or target.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theFrankFactor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. + Infinity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. WE don't give our jobs to China. Multi National Corporations do
But still I can't believe that these people who think that their brains are worth 10 of millions of dollars per year in annual salary, didn't have the foresight to think of who would buy their shit after our jobs were all gone. Obviously, it is not the people who got our jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YDogg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. agreed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. plus for moronic Specter, they finance our never ending military exploits he endorses nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. "They take our money and then they lend it back to us"
"They take our jobs. They take our money and then they lend it back to us and own a big part of America," Specter told the "Fox News Sunday" television show, adding: "I'm not too happy about a delay."

They don't "take our money." We gladly funnel it to them with our insane trade policies including the virtual absence of any import tariffs. I think Wal-Mart is now the biggest employer in China.

And the only reason they "lend it back to us" is because of the gutting of the progressive income tax system we had before saint ronnie began the GOP's destruction of our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. K&R
- Arlen is that you???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. maybe he should have served some of that up to Greenscum
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/26/business/26fed.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all

But even as Mr. Greenspan was being celebrated as the economy's "maestro," he sounded far less omniscient behind closed doors.

"We really do not know how this system works," he told members of the Fed's policy-making committee in Washington, according to transcripts released earlier this year. "It's clearly new. The old models just are not working."

Now, as he nears the end of his 18-year tenure in the job, Mr. Greenspan is leaving a brilliant record but a murky legacy.

Despite numerous economic shocks and financial excesses, unemployment and inflation are both lower now than many economists considered possible when Mr. Greenspan took office in 1987. But whoever moves into his spacious office on Constitution Avenue early next year faces a near-impossible task in replicating Mr. Greenspan's success in managing monetary policy.

That is because Mr. Greenspan abhorred rules, was skeptical about economic models and jettisoned practices that were enshrined by the likes of Paul A. Volcker, his predecessor, and Milton Friedman, a winner of the Nobel in economic science. If Mr. Greenspan stood for anything, it was flexibility and the freedom from dogma.

"The Greenspan standard has for the most part meant what Greenspan wanted to do," said Alan S. Blinder, a professor of economics at Princeton and a former vice chairman of the Federal Reserve.

Mr. Blinder will be one of many economists at a Federal Reserve symposium beginning here Friday that will be devoted to discussions about the "post-Greenspan era." Before that, however, the gathering will open with what is expected to be Mr. Greenspan's swan song speech as chairman of the Fed.

Mr. Greenspan, whose term as a Fed governor expires in January and cannot be renewed, is thought likely to devote his speech to the lessons he learned running the central bank longer than all but one of his predecessors, William McChesney Martin Jr. Expected to be listening particularly closely at the conference are three of the leading candidates to succeed him: Ben S. Bernanke, President Bush's chief economic adviser; Martin S. Feldstein, an economist at Harvard; and R. Glenn Hubbard of Columbia University.

But for all his triumphs, Mr. Greenspan also presided over a stock market bubble that burst and, in helping minimize the damage from that fiasco, laid the groundwork for the housing boom - and potential bust - that followed.

<snip>

At 78, his hair is thinning and his gait is becoming stiffer. But he may be as famous as any pop star; he is certainly a larger-than-life figure for political leaders and economists. At a hearing in July before the House Financial Services Committee, lawmakers from both parties showered him with so much praise that they began running out of accolades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
14. Gosh, Arlen, maybe we should quit giving tax breaks to companies
Edited on Mon Apr-05-10 10:04 AM by mbperrin
who offshore. Maybe if some US senators and reps could pull their heads out of lobbyists' butts, we could make it profitable to stay here.

http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/taxes/2008-03-20-corporate-tax-offshoring_N.htm

"The U.S. tax system does provide an incentive to locate production offshore," says Martin Sullivan, a contributing editor to Tax Notes, a non-profit publication that tracks tax issues.

At issue is the U.S. tax code's treatment of profits earned by foreign subsidiaries of American corporations. Profits earned in the United States are subject to the 35% corporate tax. But multinational corporations can defer paying U.S. taxes on their overseas profits until they return them to the USA — transfers that often don't happen for years. General Electric, for example, has $62 billion in "undistributed earnings" parked offshore, according to recent Securities and Exchange Commission filings. Drug giant Pfizer boasts $60 billion. ExxonMobil has $56 billion.

"If you had two companies in Pittsburgh that both were going to expand capacity and create 100 jobs, our tax code puts the company who chooses to put the plant in Pittsburgh at a competitive disadvantage over the company that chooses to move to a tax haven,"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
16. our faux democrat Spector
what an ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC