Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nelson’s Investment in Berkshire Hathaway

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 03:48 PM
Original message
Nelson’s Investment in Berkshire Hathaway
Source: New York Times

April 27, 2010, 3:19 pm
Nelson’s Investment in Berkshire Hathaway
By ERIC LICHTBLAU

Senator Ben Nelson, the Nebraska Democrat who switched sides this week to help block consideration of an overhaul of financial regulations, reported last year that he and his wife, Diane, owned up to $6 million in stock in the investment company run by the famed Nebraska investor Warren E. Buffett, who could be hurt by passage of the measure, records show.

Since Mr. Nelson’s surprise vote on Monday, speculation on Capitol Hill about his motivations has centered on his relationship with Mr. Buffett, whose firm, Berkshire Hathaway, has lobbied against one section of the legislation.

After the vote, Mr. Nelson did not address the possible connection with Mr. Buffett and pointed instead to broad concerns about uncertainties surrounding the legislation and the possible negative impact on industries like auto dealers.

But a number of political figures, including Christopher J. Dodd, the Connecticut Democrat who authored the legislation, have pointed to Mr. Nelson’s relationship with Mr. Buffett as another possible explanation. The Wall Street Journal reported this week that Mr. Nelson had successfully pushed in the Senate agriculture committee at the request of Berkshire Hathaway for an exemption that would allow firms with existing derivatives contracts to avoid posting large amounts of collateral.

Read more: http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/27/nelsons-investment-in-berkshire-hathaway/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. A severe conflict of interest
SSDD in DC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. This much is clear.
And why has this become acceptable in our country? It has become very common.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Senators should put assests in a blind trust like the President has to. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ben there, done lots of that

I hope they post his detailed financials in this regard. Would be nice to know his 'motivation'

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newblewtoo Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Is Dodd the pot
or kettle in this piece?? K/R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Isn't it Dodd that created the Bill?
What are you suggesting. He is some kind of counter double agent for the banking industry? :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newblewtoo Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I just find it interesting
based on his record.


Commentary - Bank of America PAC money behind Dodd's Countrywide loan
Jun 19, 2008 1:37 PM (677 days ago) by Timothy P. Carney, The Examiner



WASHINGTON (Map, News) -
"We call it the 'Bank of America bill on steroids.'" A House staffer told me that, demanding anonymity, but speaking on behalf of aides to GOP members of the House Financial Services Committee.

He was talking about the bill whose Senate version has been brought to the floor this week by Sen. Chris Dodd, D-CN, and Sen. Richard Shelby, R-AL. Dodd-Shelby would let mortgage lenders off the hook for bad loans, shifting the burden ultimately to taxpayers. Dodd has received approximately $70,000 in campaign contributions from Bank of America in the last year-and-a-half.

Dodd-Shelby hit the Senate floor this week amid controversy over sweetheart loan deals Dodd and other powerful politicians received from Countrywide Financial, the lender with the most exposure to subprime mortgages at risk of default.

Continues here>
http://www.examiner.com/a-1449448~Bank_of_America_PAC_money_behind_Dodd_s_Countrywide_loan.html


I am just not convinced Dodd should be calling Nelson out. Looks like both could be quid pro quo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 05:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Yep, Dodd did create the bill that makes Professor Elizabeth Warren apoplectic.
I trust her a hell of a lot more than I trust him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's hard to see Nelson's logic in trying to vote in such a way
that makes you look like a fool afterwards.

but that's what he does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. It sounds like we need to disallow our elected officials from owning individual stocks
Let them own broad-based mutual funds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hugo_from_TN Donating Member (895 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. Dodd has a lot room to talk. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozymandius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. Publicly financed campaigns would partially fix this issue.
If he were a judge, then he would recuse himself from involvement in this debate. We really need to work on syncing these two items. Our public servants seriously need guidance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC