Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BP welcomes military help for larger Gulf oil leak

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 08:01 AM
Original message
BP welcomes military help for larger Gulf oil leak
Edited on Thu Apr-29-10 08:48 AM by KoKo
Source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100429/ap_on_bi_ge/us_louisiana_oil_rig_explosion

BP welcomes military help for larger Gulf oil leak

NEW ORLEANS – A massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is even worse than believed and as the government grows concerned that the rig's operator is ill-equipped to contain it, officials are offering a military response to try to avert a massive environmental disaster along the ecologically fragile U.S. coastline.

------

"It's premature to say this is catastrophic. I will say this is very serious," Landry said earlier Wednesday.

From the air, the thickest parts of the spill resembled rust-colored tentacles of various thickness. The air was thick with the acrid smell of petroleum.

Amid several of the thicker streaks, four gray whales could be seen swimming in the oil. It was not clear if the whales were in danger.

BP says work will begin as early as Thursday to drill a relief well to relieve pressure at the blowout site, but that could take months.

Another option is a dome-like device to cover oil rising to the surface and pump it to container vessels, but that will take two weeks to put in place, BP said.

Winds and currents in the Gulf have helped crews in recent days as they try to contain the leak. The immediate threat to sandy beaches in coastal Alabama and Mississippi has eased. But the spill has moved steadily toward the mouth of the Mississippi River and the wetland areas east of the river, home to hundreds of species of wildlife and near some rich oyster grounds.

The cost of the disaster continues to rise and could easily top $1 billion.

More than two dozen vessels moved about in the heart of the slick pulling oil-sopping booms.

Earlier Wednesday, Louisiana State Wildlife and Fisheries Secretary Robert Barham told lawmakers federal government projections show a "high probability" oil could reach the Pass a Loutre wildlife area Friday night, Breton Sound on Saturday and the Chandeleur Islands on Sunday.

In Plaquemines Parish, a sliver of Louisiana that juts into the Gulf and is home to Pass a Loutre, officials hoped to deploy a fleet of volunteers in fishing boats to spread booms that could block oil from entering inlets.

"We've got oystermen and shrimpers who know this water better than anyone," Plaquemines Paris President Billy Nungesser said. "Hopefully the Coast Guard will embrace the idea."


More at.....
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100429/ap_on_bi_ge/us_louisiana_oil_rig_explosion

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100429/ap_on_bi_ge/us_louisiana_oil_rig_explosion



(Whales were seen swimming in the oil...and other info in the article) :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. How 'bout the British military?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happygoluckytoyou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
18. nah...AMERICAN military offers to nuke it...teabaggers offer to steep it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. I am sure the taxpayer will get the bill
why carry that expensive insurance - let the taxpayer cover it.

"Wales" swimming in the oil? It has alredy reached Wales? Good heavens - traveling faster than I thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. More socialized oil drilling.
Spill, Baby, Spill! :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dotymed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Everyone should see this.
:kick: Even if they are billed, they won't pay, we will. Socialized drilling is right, except for the privatized profiting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. If they don't pay the money comes out of the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund
Up to the first billion anyway.

I think people here might do well to refresh themselves with the aftermath of the Exxon Valdez spill and the subsequent creation of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990.

Right now the most important thing to focus on is attempting to offset as much of the horrendous environmental damage about to be done by this spill. Then we can focus on the environmental and financial impact of the disaster and use this as an example of why we don't need more offshore drilling. After that we can focus on stricter regulations for the rigs which already exist and perhaps even higher fees per barrel for offshore drilling to help offset the cost of such tragedies if there ends up being a deficit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. Up to the first billion. That amount could be used up in no time.
I t says that it was raised to 2.7 billion. Hopefully the money is actually in the account and not used to cover some other endeavor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. I didn't know it had been raised. That's good news indeed.
It's been years since I had a reason to follow that bit of legislation. The fund is really just to assure cleanup if a smaller (is there such a thing?) oil company were to create an environmental disaster which exceeds their financial means to clean up.

I don't really expect BP to renege on paying for the cleanup. They'd never again be permitted to tap an offshore well if they did. Which would end up costing them way more in the long run than the cleanup of this disaster. I only mention the fund to assure the masses here that there is recourse available if a corporation were to spill and run. Perhaps this incident could even light a fire to feed new fees into the fund while the all to real ramifications of offshore drilling are still fresh in the peoples minds? One never knows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. FUCK YOU, BP!
I DEMAND that the government make a HUGE profit off of cleaning up BP's mess. Enough with privatized profits and socialized losses.

I am LIVID!

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scentopine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Exxon pays no US income tax...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magleetis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
7. Mobilize all available resources
Edited on Thu Apr-29-10 08:34 AM by Magleetis
This oil spill must be stopped. I get the feeling the big corporate oil companies just don't care. They are not doing enough. Who cares how much it costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. I agree, they will have to work the costs out later.
At this point the priority is stopping the oil spill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
8. Privatise their profits socialise their screw ups. What about the
Edited on Thu Apr-29-10 08:40 AM by doc03
deficit? I say let them pay for the clean up if it bankrupts them let them go under. I saw the guy on CNBC this morning I wanted to reach through the TV and choke the SOB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Why isn't Palin running her mouth about this mess?
Drill Baby Drill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
9. But I thought they didn't want Nasty Big Government interfering in their business?
Oh?

Really?

You mean, when they're confronting massive environmental damage - and extremely costly damage at that - then Nasty Big Government assistance becomes essential?

Interesting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burf Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
11. I'm sure the Koch Bros will
send all their resources to help their BP brethern clean up the mess. Then they can hire "Oil Slick Sarah" to do some promo work on "Drill Baby Drill" to put the oil companies in the public's good graces again.

Seems to me, I remember when the rig first blew up the national news on the radio (can't remember which network, like it makes a difference), said there was no danger from oil leaking from the well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FailureToCommunicate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
13. Will Tea-Partyers and Republicans be okay with adding THIS cost to the deficit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
15. Sounds like the Exxon Valdez all over again.
They did the same type of thing after it ran aground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric_323 Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
19. Is BP in charge of the whole operation
Edited on Thu Apr-29-10 12:51 PM by Eric_323
or does the chain of command simply run through them?


The Coast Guard has urged the company to formally request more resources from the Defense Department.


Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was briefed Thursday morning on the issue, said his spokesman, Capt. John Kirby. But Kirby said the Defense Department has received no request for help, nor is it doing any detailed planning for any mission on the oil spill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC