Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

N. Korea’s Kim appears to have entered China

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 09:51 PM
Original message
N. Korea’s Kim appears to have entered China
Source: Reuters

Reported trip, first in four years, comes amid escalating tensions with South

North Korea's hardline leader Kim Jong-il appears to have entered China, his isolated state's biggest benefactor, for a rare trip abroad as tensions are running high on the peninsula, reports said Monday.

China has the most influence in curbing the North's military grandstanding and Kim's previous trips to his neighbor have led to steps that have reduced security concerns for the economically vibrant region.

The trip to China would be the first in four years and comes at a time when Seoul is considering ways to respond to a suspected North Korean attack on one of its naval ships. South Korea lost 46 sailors in what could be one of the deadliest strikes since the end of the 1950-53 Korean War.

Read more: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36906231/ns/world_news-asiapacific/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CLANG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Let me know when he enters the gates of hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jkid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. This would be a great time for someome on behalf of the World Court
...to arrest Kim Jong il
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Easier to shoot the bastard IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 03:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. On what grounds? Is DPRK an ICC signatory?
I don't think so. There is no more basis for this than the arrest for any leader of a non-signatory state leader. US should conclude a peace treaty with DPRK and establish diplomatic relations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 03:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I agree, though it pains me to say it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I don't think North Korea wants to sign a peace treaty.
The siege mentality is ingrained to the point of national pride there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Pretty much this. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. North Korea only recently opened the door to that possibility.
Until this past January, North Korea has always refused to even discuss peace with the United States, and their position on negotiating with South Korea has been "Remove all U.S. troops from South Korea, demilitarize the border, and then we can discuss reunification". For obvious reasons, South Korea has always declined those terms.

This past January, for the first time ever, The DPRK has indicated a willingness to enter into a formal and permanent peace agreement with the United States. It attached all sorts of conditions to those talks, however, including requirements that human rights, their nuclear weapons program, the status of Korea as one nation or two, and the absolute military rule of the country not even be broached as topics. The Obama administration responded by refusing the offer, saying that signing a new treaty is pointless if they aren't even willing to live up to the obligations they agreed to in previous treaties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. There were suggestions of a coup attempt the last time he left the country
Images and signs of Kim suddenly vanished all over the place, military started acting weird, etc., then things were back to abnormal in a few days. I don't think anyone outside the country ever figure out what happened there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC