Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Greenspan Wanted Housing-Bubble Dissent Kept Secret

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 09:18 PM
Original message
Greenspan Wanted Housing-Bubble Dissent Kept Secret
Source: Huffington Post

Greenspan Wanted Housing-Bubble Dissent Kept Secret
05- 3-10 03:09 PM

As top Federal Reserve officials debated whether there was a housing bubble and what to do about it, then-Chairman Alan Greenspan argued that the dissent should be kept secret so that the Fed wouldn't lose control of the debate to people less well-informed than themselves.

"We run the risk, by laying out the pros and cons of a particular argument, of inducing people to join in on the debate, and in this regard it is possible to lose control of a process that only we fully understand," Greenspan said, according to the transcripts of a March 2004 meeting.

At the same meeting, a Federal Reserve bank president from Atlanta, Jack Guynn, warned that "a number of folks are expressing growing concern about potential overbuilding and worrisome speculation in the real estate markets, especially in Florida. Entire condo projects and upscale residential lots are being pre-sold before any construction, with buyers freely admitting that they have no intention of occupying the units or building on the land but rather are counting on 'flipping' the properties--selling them quickly at higher prices."

Had Guynn's warning been heeded and the housing market cooled, the financial collapse of 2008 could have been avoided. But his comment was kept secret until Friday, when the central bank released the transcripts of Federal Open Market Committee meetings for 2004 and CalculatedRisk spotted it. The transcripts for 2005 to the present are still secret.

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/03/greenspan-wanted-housing_n_560965.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Complicity: thy name is Greenspan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. complicity? Alan was at the forefront of the movement to privatize and deregulate to let capitalism
flourish and bring wondrous prosperity to all

this has been going on since the 70s, when we started seeing distinct libertarians, the Powell Memo, and the anti-Great Society backlash (even if Dick Nixon did give us the EPA); remember that Greenspan was in Rand's depraved cult of the dollar sign
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. any arrogance here? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Greenscum was the bailout king - remember Long Term Capital Management?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long-Term_Capital_Management

Long-Term Capital Management (LTCM) was a U.S. hedge fund which used trading strategies such as fixed income arbitrage, statistical arbitrage, and pairs trading, combined with high leverage. It failed spectacularly in the late 1990s, leading to a massive bailout by other major banks and investment houses,<1> which was supervised by the Federal Reserve.

LTCM was founded in 1994 by John Meriwether, the former vice-chairman and head of bond trading at Salomon Brothers. Board of directors members included Myron Scholes and Robert C. Merton, who shared the 1997 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences.<2> Initially enormously successful with annualized returns of over 40% (after fees) in its first years, in 1998 it lost $4.6 billion in less than four months following the Russian financial crisis and became a prominent example of the risk potential in the hedge fund industry. The fund folded in early 2000.

**************

this was the preview - after shithead escaped with his gonads on this one, he played the world for an even bigger sucker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. "...to lose control of a process that only we fully understand..."
....does democracy rub you the wrong way, Mr Greenspan?....are the dirty unwashed masses incapable of understand the fucking that you, the banks and wall street have given them?....could unpleasant side-effects result?

....and here your old-lady's a journalist, who earns a living shining light on corruption on behalf of the public....I would have thought that she would have explained to you that sunshine is always the best disinfectant....

....you could have just put a little sunscreen on that moldy old ass of yours and did the right thing....but now, you're gonna get burned....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. Quick, someone check Greenspan's birth certificate!
We need to send him to Gibber where they speak Gibberish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. There Couldn't Be ANYBODY Less Informed Than The Feds and Greenspan
so what's the alternate excuse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. All the more reason for more sunshine and disinfectant. Audit The Fed!
Grayson and Paul were talking about exactly that tonite (Greenspan transcripts)in their final push on Ratigan for Bernie Sanders' Senate version amendment that parallels theirs.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cmJxW3q2go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. How many members of the Fed Board were seated then
Bush refused to fill vacancies in the Fed Reserve Board during his entire 8 years in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. What an idiot ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Indeed: "only we understand". nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
12. Many people fully understood "the process."
It's easy to explain, really.

Real wages (adjusted for inflation) have gone down in the last 30 years thanks to what saint ronnie started. To keep people buying stuff, debt was substituted for income through easy credit. (Most people got multiple offers in the mail for credit cards every week, remember?) After people maxed out that form of credit, another was created -- the house. Mortgage money was available to everyone! No real income or proof thereof required (liar's loans.) Hence, property values bubbled due to all this undeserved credit flooding the market with monopoly money. As prices kept "rising," people used their houses as ATM's with HELOC's to keep buying.

Now that's over, sort of. Now Fannie Mae is doing practically the same thing -- no-down with interest-only option loans. The only difference is that now you must document your income. Gee, what a concept! If only we did that before. Oh, wait...

Anything to prop up the still-artificially-high housing prices to kick the can down the road.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
13. Maybe he didn't want his mother to find out her son is merely a rube.
Was she still alive then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
15. Right . . . because Greenspan/FED work for private interests . . . not nation, not public!!
Edited on Tue May-04-10 12:55 PM by defendandprotect
and we need to take back control of our money supply and POLITICAL decisions

from people with private interests and put them back in the hands of our

Congress. Some of them don't want to make political decisions re the economy

which might hurt them at election time. Puts more tension in play with their

pre-bribed and pre-owned status.

But we elect these people to make these decisions -- and they should be doing it!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC