Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BP completes first of three containment domes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
B2G Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 12:43 PM
Original message
BP completes first of three containment domes
Source: The New York Times

BP completes first of three containment domes
Firm says it will shoulder cost of Gulf cleanup
By Campbell Robertson, New York Times | May 4, 2010

NEW ORLEANS — BP reported some progress yesterday in its efforts to stem oil leaks from an undersea well off the Louisiana coast that have created what President Obama called a “potentially unprecedented environmental disaster.’’

Bill Salvin, a company spokesman, said that crews had finished building a containment dome, a 4-story, 70-ton structure that the company plans to lower into place over one of the three leaks to catch the escaping oil and allow it to be pumped to the surface.

Two more domes would be completed today, Salvin said, and crews hoped to install all three domes by the weekend.

“That will essentially eliminate most of the issues you have with oil in the water,’’ he said.



Read more: http://www.boston.com/news/science/articles/2010/05/04/bp_completes_first_of_three_containment_domes/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. I Really Hope This Works
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plaid Adder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
29. Yeah, me too!
Cause what @#$! happens if it doesn't?

I mean, that's the thing that's really terrifying about this...that nobody knows for sure how to stop it. It's just going to be a big trial-and-error-fest.

:scared:

The Plaid Adder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dulcinea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
34. Same here.
I love the Gulf Coast. This story has made me heartsick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLPanhandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. I hope these work.
However, I'm also worried this could damage the pipe further and cause even more flow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. BP made $5.3 BILLION this quarter -- should be barred from further involvement
in oil industry -- as well as Halliburton!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. All three installed by the weekend? Wow.
I'd been reading about how it might be months.

I hope all goes well, I don't care who fixes it...

Just get it done.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B2G Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. The 'months' estimate is for the relief wells
not the containment devices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. They can't be sure these will hold up at 5K feet....
.....hope...what a concept. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B2G Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. At 70 tons, I think they stand a good chance of 'holding up'
Edited on Tue May-04-10 12:59 PM by B2G
It's the placement that has me worried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Exactly. The pressure of water is from both sides of metal, so no worries.
It's how they put it down, do they cover the leak, and will it stand (hey, is the ground even horizontal?). It will be filled in a jiffy, in which case it will try to float and might flip over. They should pump the oil out before it fills up. It's a dynamical situation and I don't know how the conduit will work. At this length, assuming it is filled with oil, it will try to float and might displace the dome. It all depends on the numbers - I hope their engineers are on top of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B2G Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. My understanding is that the bottom of the ocean there is very soft & muddy
The dome will sink approximately 15 feet upon placement, so that shouldn't be a worry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
32. They Need To Have The Valves On The Dome Pipe Kept Open
So the flow is already going up the pipe as it's being placed. That would relieve the upward pressure against the dome and it won't fill up as fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. the thickness...not weight...at that depth... .has never been tried... that is my concern. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 05:15 AM
Response to Reply #22
36. You're still focussing on the wrong thing ...
The thickness is only an issue with respect to the pressure differential.

The bigger problem is landing it in the correct place when you are working
a mile below the surface of the water ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. I don't trust BP to get anything right.... their genius started this FUBAR. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Well, then, perhaps
They should just walk away?

Accidents happen. I know this doesn't seem to be a popular concept in the last couple of weeks but nothing is 100% risk proof. Just walking out the door of your house and getting in your car (or on public transportation) holds unknown risks for yourself and others. There will never be a mechanical or electrical system that is completely immune to failure. No matter how many fail safes you have in place, there is no guarantee there won't be a complete system wide failure.

Shit happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Oh, I never thought of that....
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MellowDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. Actually, the cause hasn't yet been determined...
and might be the fault of another company. So far BP is the only one willing to go and clean it up who has the means and the engineering to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. Here is a video of the construction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. They have my sincere wish for success here.
Please, oh please, let this work.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riskpeace Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. These really need to work, please!
I'm one containment dome away from bankruptcy at this point. It seems like trying to drop a thimble on a volcano, but I'm no expert.

BP showed up in Panama City, FL to mobilize a new staging area. I'm glad they're here, but that's sort of like when Jim Cantore from the Weather Channel shows up in your town during hurricane season.

http://www.newsherald.com/news/hosting-83532-address-meeting.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meeshrox Donating Member (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. My question is...
Edited on Tue May-04-10 01:28 PM by meeshrox
all of this oil they are lapping up, and will be collecting in these domes, where will it go? Will it go to the refineries at a profit to BP? No well testing, pumping, etc. Pure profit, even now...

edited to add: not that I would want them to waste it...but just consider this when they balk at paying more than the $75 million they will be required by law...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B2G Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. There is a 5000 ft pipe attached to the top of the structure
The oil will flow up to the surface through the pipe and be collected in container ships.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meeshrox Donating Member (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Yes, I understand...
I mean, once they collect it in the container ships...where will it go?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B2G Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. To a refinery I would imagine
To separate the sea water out and be processed. What else are they supposed to do with it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meeshrox Donating Member (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. It almost seems like you just skimmed my first post
I said that, too. I am simply bringing up the fact that they'll be claiming this $6 million per day loss when they are really making some money on the leak...not sure of the offset, but it obviously will not be nearly as bad as they will report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B2G Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Whatever. That's the least of my worries at the moment. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meeshrox Donating Member (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. That's fine...no worries
Hope things are ok...:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Yup, otherwise they could just use one of these.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
15. “That will essentially eliminate most of the issues you have with oil in the water,’’
Two things.

1. It's a catastrophe, one that your company caused, not an "issue."

2. IF it works (never been done before) it will prevent any ADDITIONAL contamination. The gigantic spill that has already happened will still be there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B2G Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I would assume he meant 'additional' oil
And these containers are routinely used. Just not at this depth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. I think his words were crafted to minimize the impression of the damage. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B2G Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. A little late for that, no? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. One would think so. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
26. Everything they're doing might make it worse rather than better.
My gut instinct tells me that there's a greater chance it will get worse rather than better. Ugh.

We brought this on ourselves. We're gluttons. This may be our final moment in a horrible Monty Python sketch... Mr Creosote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #26
38. How would this make it worse?
Even if there were not 100% containment, slowing the leak down drastically minimizes the impact on the environment and buys time to come up with a more permanent solution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B2G Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
27. Maybe someone can help me with this
Take a look at the riser pipe. There are 3 leaks and each container will be place on one of them. The riser pipe is connected. What will happen to the pipe when the containers are placed? Will it sever the pipe or what? If so, why do they need 3 of them? Confused by the logistics...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Feeling their way back from the end of the pipe to the main complex?
Also if the domes along the riser and at the well head don't crimp the riser, oil will continue to flow along it. Thus all three leaks do need to be plugged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B2G Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. NYC_SKP was kind enough to post this in another thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
33. I didn't read the article linked to, so this may have been addressed
but my understanding has been that, while this could be a very successful solution once in place, that guiding the boxes into place at that depth, and in those conditions, may prove the tricky part.

Here is to hoping for success! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC