Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jailed Mich. militia members could be released

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 05:26 AM
Original message
Jailed Mich. militia members could be released
Source: AP/Yahoo

Nine jailed militia members accused of conspiring to overthrow the U.S. government have won the latest round in the fight over whether they will be freed while they wait for trial. In a ruling late Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Victoria Roberts said she would not further suspend her Monday order that releases the militia members with strict conditions, including electronic monitoring and curfews.

..snip..

"Defendants are presumed innocent of all charges against them. ... This presumption of innocence is part and parcel of why, 'In our society liberty is the norm, and detention prior to trial or without trial is the carefully limited exception,'" Roberts wrote, quoting a 1987 U.S. Supreme Court decision. The members of the southern Michigan militia, called Hutaree, are charged with conspiracy to commit sedition, or rebellion, against the government and the attempted use of weapons of mass destruction. They have been in custody without bond since late March.

Authorities, citing secretly recorded conversations, say the group planned to kill a police officer and bomb the subsequent funeral. Defense attorneys say it was nothing more than hateful talk.
Prosecutors claim the suspects are too dangerous to be released from jail. But Roberts has set many restrictions and appointed third-party custodians, mostly family members, to keep watch.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100506/ap_on_re_us/us_fbi_raids_militia




Ruling came late Wednesday, AP reported 3:17 am ET
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mrs_p Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. this is so confusing
i thought alleged terrorists don't get out on bail. plus,

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varelse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. Let me guess...
they are white and "christian", right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Maybe you should take your wild-assed guess and format it into a complaint to Judge Roberts
Edited on Thu May-06-10 10:31 AM by slackmaster


...Hon. Victoria A. Roberts of Detroit is currently a federal judge for the Eastern District of Michigan and served as the 62nd president of the State Bar of Michigan. Her strong leadership in voluntary legal services to the poor and dedication to pro bono and public service initiatives earned her nomination by the D. Augustus Straker Bar Association. During her State Bar presidency, she appointed the State Bar Task Force on Racial/Ethnic and Gender Issues in the Courts and Legal Profession and implemented the State Bar's first "Access to Justice for All Hotline" for the public during the State Bar's Annual Meeting....

http://www.michbar.org/news/releases/archives99/9_10e_99.cfm

Maybe, just maybe Judge Roberts decided that the government doesn't have much of a case.

This thread will now sink like a rock, without anyone admitting they've made an inaccurate knee-jerk assumption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Thanks Slack some of us knew that
Hon. Victoria A. Roberts was appointed by President William Jefferson Clinton in 1998 with the unanimous advice and consent of the U.S. Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varelse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. So... they're not white "christians"
woops, my bad...

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yet if they were muslims with brown skin they would be being waterboarded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. The "White Privilege" Canard. One more time - Here is some information about the judge in the case.
Edited on Thu May-06-10 10:29 AM by slackmaster


...Hon. Victoria A. Roberts of Detroit is currently a federal judge for the Eastern District of Michigan and served as the 62nd president of the State Bar of Michigan. Her strong leadership in voluntary legal services to the poor and dedication to pro bono and public service initiatives earned her nomination by the D. Augustus Straker Bar Association. During her State Bar presidency, she appointed the State Bar Task Force on Racial/Ethnic and Gender Issues in the Courts and Legal Profession and implemented the State Bar's first "Access to Justice for All Hotline" for the public during the State Bar's Annual Meeting....

http://www.michbar.org/news/releases/archives99/9_10e_99.cfm

I think that makes four threads shot down by this information in the last three days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. I agree with the judge's ruling, I also disagreed with
Edited on Thu May-06-10 11:00 AM by sabrina 1
permanent detention of Muslims without access to the justice system, with no chance of bail or public trial. For stating that many times, I was attacked by both left and right. Right when Bush was president, left when Obama took over.

The question is, will there be a huge outcry over her decision since these defendents are NOT Muslims? Her statements are correct, she is abiding by the rule of law. But if these people were Muslims, Fox, Limbaugh et al would be all over this judge, calling her a 'Liberal making law from the bench'. Now, let's see if the reaction is the same for these defendents.

The problem isn't whether the judge is black or white. The problem is the disparity between the way the public will react to Muslims plotting these kinds of acts and how they will react to White Christians being released. We'll see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Thanks for your thoughtful comment. I pretty much agree with everything you wrote.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alcibiades Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. Just look at what they are accused of
You can plot to kill a cop and his mourners and still get bail?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. These restrictions better include not getting their guns and bomb making materials back.
Or are gun groups pleading their case already?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Federal law prohibits anyone who is under indictment for a felony from having a gun
But of course you didn't know that, because you have NEVER bothered to learn anything about the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Hey, guns laws are being loosened daily.
Some people want to be able to 'march' with guns right up to the White House and Capitol.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boycottfaux Donating Member (161 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
6. Where is Faux??
How come faux isn't using their airwaves to urge these militia
'terrorists' be tried in military court?

[crickets]
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. If it has anything to do with guns, they love them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tencats Donating Member (226 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
13. Federal appeals court has stopped the release of nine jailed Michigan militia members
May 6, 2010 10:48 AM
The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati issued an emergency stay Thursday morning.
http://www.chicagobreakingnews.com/2010/05/judge-to-let-michigan-militia-members-free-on-bail.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. thanks for the update

I guess the Court of Appeals went with the 'detention prior to trial or without trial is the carefully limited exception' part of her ruling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC