Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. agency let oil industry write offshore drilling rules

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 07:37 PM
Original message
U.S. agency let oil industry write offshore drilling rules
Edited on Mon May-10-10 07:39 PM by kpete
Source: McClatchy

U.S. agency let oil industry write offshore drilling rules


* Posted on Monday, May 10, 2010

By Les Blumenthal and Erika Bolstad | McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON — The oil industry, not the federal agency that regulates it, plays a crucial role in writing the safety and environmental rules for offshore drilling, a role that critics say reflects cozy ties between an industry and its regulators that need to be snapped.

Nearly 100 industry standards set by the American Petroleum Industry are included in the nation's offshore operating regulations. The API asserts that its standards are better for the industry's bottom line and make it easier to operate offshore than if the Minerals Management Service set the rules.

..................

The agency has a built-in conflict. It's responsible for regulating offshore drilling, but also for leasing tracts on the outer continental shelf and collecting royalties on the oil and gas they produce. The MMS generates more revenue for the federal Treasury than any other agency except the Internal Revenue Service.

So while one arm of the agency is trying to make money, the other tries to regulate an industry where pumping oil sometimes trumps safety and environmental concerns.







Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/05/10/93859/us-agency-lets-oil-industry-write.html#ixzz0nZojYJn5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. When were the current rules written? Under Bush? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Long ago if what I have found is all there is. I think the EPA may have additional regs.
The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 requires offshore drilling operations to submit an environmental management plan. The Clean Air Act (1970) requires offshore drilling operations to submit data on pollutant emissions into the air. The Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 gives U.S. states the right to oppose offshore drilling activities. The Endangered Species Act of 1973 imposes strict regulations on offshore drilling operations near marine environments containing endangered species. The Clean Water Act of 1977 mandates offshore drilling operations acquire a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit before discharging pollutants into waterways.
. . . . .
The Outer Continental Shelf Deepwater Royalty Relief Act (DWRRA) of 1995 was designed to encourage offshore drilling in the Gulf of Mexico by providing royalty relief on oil and natural gas sales from this region. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) is an international treaty governing offshore drilling activities. In 2002, the treaty was accepted by 138 countries including the United States. The treaty addresses environmental concerns tied to offshore drilling activities. The Energy Policy Act of 2005 encourages offshore exploration (even on lands under moratorium as long as drilling does not occur) by implementing several funding measures aimed at increasing offshore oil and gas production. In 2010, the Senate passed HB 3613, a ban on offshore drilling in Oregon's coastal waters which is not set to expire until 2020.
. . . .

http://www.ehow.com/list_6319274_offshore-drilling-regulations.html

Have a laugh (a bitter one).

. . . .

Environmental Impacts. This option is analyzed in the draft EIS under
Alternative 1. The probability of an oil spill of 1,000 barrels or more in this
area under this alternative would be 62-85 percent. A summary of the EIS
findings follows.

Water Quality—Structure placement produces turbidity that can temporarily
degrade affected waters; normal background concentrations of
suspended solids will return when activity ceases. Confined portions of
some channels may be unable to assimilate bilge water and sanitary wastes,
thus resulting in some minor regional degradation. Compliance with U.S.
Coast Guard regulations would assist in avoiding most impacts to such
receiving waters. Overall marine water quality impacts from routine
activities would be minor as compliance with NPDES permit requirements
minimizes or avoids most impacts. Oil-spill impacts to water quality could
range from minor to moderate depending on dispersion and weathering.

. . . .

OCS Oil & Gas Leasing Program 2002-2007

Here is the current OCS Oil & Gas Leasing Program for 2007-2012:

http://www.mms.gov/5-year/PDFs/MMSProposedFinalProgram2007-2012.pdf

Similarly vague. The EPA and/or Coast Guard may have more stringent regulations. I may not be finding the right documents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. You mean, like the coal companies and the banking/finance companies?
I see a trend here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. k -- and isn't that what oil industry money bought?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. OMG


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. We obviously need less regulation of the oil business then..
...and more "federal oversight". Maybe we just aren't framing this right to the teabaggers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lagomorph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. What we need is a trail of accountability....
The law should leave no doubt about exactly who is responsible at every step of the drilling process.

With a $75 million cap on liability, the oil companies had little motive to ensure a solution was available. It wouldn't even impact their bottom line during the current quarter.

Unfortunately, Obama wasn't familiar enough with "standard industry practices" to make his liability demands stick. Anything he does will have to go to court. The tougher the legislation, the more it will impact the level of revenues the government takes from the oil operations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. What we need are some execs sent to federal Michael Bolton prison
or on the receiving end of some frontier justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. NOw there's a shock
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon_sephiroth Donating Member (315 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. No surprise there
Until we stop letting candidates and campaigns take money from people and organizations like these, everything is for sale, laws, votes, candidates, and as long as everything is for sale, the wealthiest will always win, they are the only ones that can afford to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
11. There's a solution to this. OBVIATE THE OIL COMPANIES BY ADOPTING ALTERNATIVE ENERGY.
That's the real solution. Obviate the need for any fossil fuel. Coal kills too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC