Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Plan to cap Gulf of Mexico oil leak with dome delayed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 11:23 PM
Original message
Plan to cap Gulf of Mexico oil leak with dome delayed
Source: BBC

A new attempt by BP to control the main leak at the Gulf of Mexico oil well disaster site with a steel dome has been put back by a "few days".

Earlier, the British oil giant said it hoped the "top hat", which is now on the seabed, would be deployed by Thursday at the broken pipeline.

An attempt to use a larger containment dome failed on Sunday when it became clogged with ice and gas.
The well is spewing out some 5,000 barrels (210,000 gallons) of oil a day.

The "top hat" is meant to siphon oil into container ships but there is no guarantee that the plan will work, the BBC's Andy Gallacher reports.

The first of two relief wells being drilled is not expected to be ready for some three months.

Read more: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8680460.stm



We are screwed. My apologies to Mother Earth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why don't they just pull out that pipe and seal that hole?
BP, give it up! Don't siphon oil into ships .. let it go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. How?
Edited on Fri May-14-10 12:27 AM by boppers
You have a massive amount of high pressure, volatile, buoyant liquid and gas shooting out of a hole in the ground, far under the sea, how do you seal it? The 125 ton (yes, 125 tons) cap they attempted to put on didn't work, it just floated up and off.

edit:typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Just wishful thinking
I know it's not so simple. I should have added sarcasm smiley in that post. I am getting so impatient seeing that horrible gushing ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Sealing a hole gushing oil at 100,000PSI
is not so easy as you'd like to believe. People keep thinking the delay has to do with oil salvage, which is ridiculous. Its just a nigh-unpluggable hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ex Lurker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. the pipe is the only thing that keeps it from gushing even faster
I've heard it compared to a mini volcano.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. And they must be careful with sand abrasion and their devices that it doesn't blow.. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. 'Gulf of Mexico oil leak'
Gulf of Mexico didn't leak a damn thing, BP did, and it's not a 'leak' it's a gusher.
BBC is normally better with their titles


What horrible news

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovely Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. keeping my fingers crossed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paradlddle Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. Plan to cap
Just nuke it that's what the Russians did. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamtechus Donating Member (868 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Probably not a bad idea
But too politically scary for our elected wimps.

Something that might also work would be to drill a 100 ft deep hole adjacent to the oil pipe and insert high explosive charge,
then set it off collapsing the oil pipe/hole far below ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
10. Earlier thread:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
11. Why don't they use something like this?
(Queue the Death Star music. Yes, this is very real)



http://www.brookings.edu/projects/archive/nucweapons/runit.aspx

Beneath this concrete dome on Runit Island (part of Enewetak Atoll), built between 1977 and 1980 at a cost of about $239 million, lie 111,000 cubic yards (84,927 cubic meters) or radioactive soil and debris from Bikini and Rongelap atolls. The dome covers the 30-foot (9 meter) deep, 350-foot (107 meter) wide crated created by the May 5, 1958, Cactus test. Note the people atop the dome.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Interestingly enough, a nuke detonation has been suggested.
When a nuclear explosion to seal the geyser is suggested as a "less damaging option" is when we know we have a serious problem. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. no shit. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
12. Why don't they just admit they don't know what the hell they are doing?!
Call in all the best and brightest physicists and scientists now!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
15. One word: Tampax.
A friend of mine suggested this on facebook: use a porous, absorbent, material that expands and secures itself *because* of the pressure.

The "applicator" would likely have to be a few hundred feet or more, to wedge against bedrock, and once the sleeve was pulled, it would balloon up and use the pressure to press against the walls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CHIMO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
17. Of Course
Let them put forward the technical basis showing that it would work.

They are playing people. It is just a delaying tactic until they have the second well done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC