He gets a lot of respect among the Houston legal community as a no-bullshit judge. Here's some local media coverage.
Houston Press (local alt weekly, part of the Village Voice Media family):
http://www.houstonpress.com/2002-09-26/best-of-houston/best-criminal-judgeRepublican Lynn Hughes hardly blinked when he advanced from his state district court (a civil one, no less) to the federal bench some 12 years ago. That characteristic aplomb has yet to be erased by some of the most demanding cases at the federal courthouse. He's coupled a healthy disdain for the traditional veil of legalese with a quiet but firm demeanor that has established him as one of the most independent jurists anywhere. Hughes demanded answers in a shady immunity deal for the notorious Graham brothers. And he didn't shy away from forcing the government to admit to submitting a false affidavit against an ex-CIA agent and lying to a grand jury in a bank fraud case. By now, his straightforward search for the truth is legendary among lawyers.
He busts the balls of federal prosecutors on a routine basis... but usually it's in favor business executives and attorneys. From Houston's Clear Thinkers, a blog by a local Republican lawyer who's also big on business:
http://blog.kir.com/archives/2006/04/lynn_hughes_str_1.aspFirst, he hammered the FDIC with a record sanctions award in the long-running case against Maxxam chairman Charles Hurwitz.
Then, he challenged the Enron Task Force's bludgeoning of a plea bargain from a mid-level former Enron executive.
Now, U.S. District Judge Lynn Hughes accused federal prosecutors of "reckless and conscious indifference" for bringing a fraud charge against Oklahoma lawyer John Claro and said he would award attorney's fees to Claro under the Hyde Act that provides sanctions for bad-faith prosecutions.
Plenty of embedded links at both those excerpts. And lastly, Judgepedia.
http://judgepedia.org/index.php/Lynn_HughesMy personal opinion is that BP plaintiffs could do a
whole lot worse than this guy. What he most certainly will do is disallow any damage claims he considers "frivolous", which is probably the worst case scenario for those who litigate to be 'made whole'.