Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EXCLUSIVE: New Docs Show Truman Integrated Forces, Despite Military Objections

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 10:37 AM
Original message
EXCLUSIVE: New Docs Show Truman Integrated Forces, Despite Military Objections
Edited on Thu Jul-22-10 10:40 AM by kpete
Source: Think Progress

EXCLUSIVE: New Docs Show Truman Integrated Forces, Despite Military Objections

Earlier this month, as part of the year-long Defense Department review of the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy, the Pentagon distributed surveys to some 400,000 servicemembers to gauge their reaction to repealing the policy. While LGBT groups have characterized the questionnaire — which asks the troops to speculate on the sexuality of fellow servicemembers — as “derogatory and insulting,” the Pentagon continues to insist that they need to know what the troops are thinking in order to properly repeal the ban. “How do we identify beforehand the problems, the issues, and the challenges that we’re going to face? The kind of training requirements we’re going to need, the kinds of changes in regulations, the impact on benefits — all of these things need to be addressed in advance…. That’s where we want to hear from you all,” Defense Secretary Robert Gates told troops stationed in South Korea.

Earlier this week, the Advocate’s Kerry Eleveld reported, contrary to prior reports, that this is not the first time the military had surveyed the troops. “Prior to President Truman’s 1948 executive order integrating the armed forces…our preliminary research shows that branches of the armed forces undertook a number of modestly sized surveys of the attitudes of enlisted and nonenlisted troops concerning racial issues, integration, and morale,” Eleveld quoted a Defense Department spokesperson as saying.

Following this lead, the Wonk Room traveled to the National Archives and recovered some of the surveys the military conducted about the troops’ attitudes towards black and Jewish people between 1942 and 1946. At the time, the military — along with the overwhelming majority of the country — opposed integrating black servicemembers into the forces and preferred a ’separate but equal’ approach that would have required the military to construct separate recreation spaces and facilities. The survey about Jews was no more promising, with 86% of the soldiers agreeing that “there is nothing good about Jews“:

DOCS:http://www.scribd.com/doc/34612500/Final-Race-Wonk-Room

Read more: http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/22/dadt-docs/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Obama surveys, Truman acts - Obama is no Harry Truman nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Truman took 3 years to ACT. Truman was no savior. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. you don't know the times. he was a savior. I grew up with segregation,
sundown laws, 'n' words in normal conversation (not in my family) and worse. Lynching was normal. HST intregated the military because it was right and he did it with blitzkrieg speed over the objections of everyone. He deserves respect. I know. I was there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. "blitzkrieg speed"? 8 years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. yeah. for the times, that was blitzkrieg speed. truly. Eight years now
seems like an infinity but then, it was lightning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moosepoop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. "Obama surveys, Truman acts " -- guess you didn't read past the headline.
Here's some info from the article you didn't read:

Earlier this week, the Advocate’s Kerry Eleveld reported, contrary to prior reports, that this is not the first time the military had surveyed the troops. “Prior to President Truman’s 1948 executive order integrating the armed forces…our preliminary research shows that branches of the armed forces undertook a number of modestly sized surveys of the attitudes of enlisted and nonenlisted troops concerning racial issues, integration, and morale,” Eleveld quoted a Defense Department spokesperson as saying.

Following this lead, the Wonk Room traveled to the National Archives and recovered some of the surveys the military conducted about the troops’ attitudes towards black and Jewish people between 1942 and 1946. At the time, the military — along with the overwhelming majority of the country — opposed integrating black servicemembers into the forces and preferred a ’separate but equal’ approach that would have required the military to construct separate recreation spaces and facilities. The survey about Jews was no more promising, with 86% of the soldiers agreeing that “there is nothing good about Jews“:


So, Truman surveyed (just as Obama is doing now), and then he acted -- several years later (I don't think Obama will take as long).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. well - isn't that interesting. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yep, it's called "being a leader"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. Truman's presidency has become underrated over the years - he gets a bad rap
for the atomic bomb, which is outside the scope of this thread, but he did a lot of good for race relations- he enabled minorities to find careers in the military and the federal government...FWIW, the Army in WWII had seperate black ground combat units, led mostly by white officers. Some served under Patton in his Third Army in their drive across Europe.
Not as well known are the black US ground combat units that served in WWI...They were highly decorated warriors, and were later denied any recognition...people refused to believe blacks could fight.

The integrated US Army served in the Korean War and every US war since then. The Navy was slower to integrate blacks-and Jews-but eventually they came around as well.


mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colsohlibgal Donating Member (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. How About HST!
Who knew indeed. No doubt he did have a spine and he was on the right side of this issue and had it come up I could see him in principle standing up for the LGBT folks. RIP Harry, if you are somehow looking down I'm sure you're horrified of the wingnuts and the slimy bought out democrats like Dodd.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. President Truman also signed Executive Order 9835 though...
President Truman also signed Executive Order 9835 though-- for no other reason than it was a politically sound decision. Two steps forward, three steps back for his administration too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. What was 9835?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. The first established loyalty program in the US...
The first established loyalty program in the US, which allow political screenings and was the prelude in f minor to the McCarthy Witch Hunts.

Truman actually said in his autobiography that he was opposed to it-- on both legal and moral grounds, and the only reason he stepped over his own conscious was to preempt the GOP dominated congress from doing it first and thus gaining credit for it (it was a popular idea at the time as we're referring to the genesis of the Red Scare movement).

A law recognized by the sitting President as unethical by his own admission was prompted by him for no other reason than politics. The more things chance, the more things stay the same. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. I do recall that the political side of my family was quietly disgusted with him --
Edited on Thu Jul-22-10 10:31 PM by defendandprotect
if not seething as I recall it --

I think since he was a Democrat much he did wasn't as "worried" over at that time --

though I'm not really sure . . . ??????

Cold War was his -- relationship with John McCloy way out there --

Taft-Hartley was his, right?

I do recall the horror of the Rosenbergs -- but not sure if that began under Truman?

And, a bit of the McCarthy business -- which at some point was Ike -- but at the time I didn't

really understand it.

I think many Americans were again asleep -- though many tried to wake them up!!

And found only disappointment --

Again, right wing FEAR based garbage --


Thank you for the response -- I could have googled it -- but wanted to know how you were

looking at it --

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. K&R --
Edited on Thu Jul-22-10 01:37 PM by defendandprotect
Unfortunately, he was also brought in to replace Henry Wallace --

who left office 4 months before FDR died --

What pressures on FDR moved him to do this, I don't know --

but our futures would have been quite different had Henry Wallace been VP and succeeded FDR.

and Ole Harry did drop the atomic bombs on Japanese civilians -- which many

military -- including Ike -- and others were against --

Truman was sadly very close to John McCloy --

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. HST headed a committee that saved this country zillions of dollars
from war profiteers and Halliburton type bullshit. He was impeccably honest and no one's fool and that is why he was chosen. I am really pissed over the bashing of this man. He was the last dem president with a spine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Truman wasn't perfect by any means . . .
Edited on Thu Jul-22-10 10:15 PM by defendandprotect
from dropping atomic weapons on civilians to Taft-Hartley --

He was moving the party to the right -- no doubt about it --

All seems very liberal right now, of course --

Desegregating the military was terrific --

Bear in mind how he fits into the times --

And -- no one is "bashing" Truman -- we are discussing his policies --

no one has a personal dilike for him -- we either admire or don't admire the things

he did.

And -- this is a debating board -- you can expect to hear things you don't like --

and expect that you will be saying things that others don't like. That's free speech.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. He was the last President to leave office not a millionaire.
He lived on his WWI pension.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. It was harder to hide then . . .
nor is anyone suggesting that he was a thief . . . as far as I can see???

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. and you can also hear the same too. free speech works both ways.
I just agree that on my Harry, we will not agree on much but that's okay with me. this isn't a contest. I am a FDR dem of the old school.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Evidently you didn't notice that's EXACTLY what I said to you . . .
Edited on Fri Jul-23-10 04:12 PM by defendandprotect
And -- this is a debating board -- you can expect to hear things you don't like --

and expect that you will be saying things that others don't like. That's free speech.



Guess everyone has some personal attachment to public figures --

I've had some as well -- just remember they are human -- and they are politicians!

LOVED FDR . . . .

only a few things I didn't like --


:evilgrin:

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lightning Count Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. Was this before or after he dropped the first atomic weapons on two civilian targets?
Yawn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
15.  yawn back atcha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Atomic weapons are a "yawn" . . . ???
Wow -- guess "civilians" brings . . . two "yawns" -- ???

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. He saved my father a#$#@^%$e
Edited on Thu Jul-22-10 10:30 PM by saigon68
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
20. Truman did not need Congressional approval. Obama does.
And securing the last few votes in the Senate needed military approval, or at least neutrality.

Obviously the "review" is ludicrous and offensively homophobic, not remotely necessary in objective terms, but it's also the price the military asked for. It's a rather bitter pill to swallow, and there's no reason for anyone to be happy about it, but if it paves the way for DADT repeal--the "if" is my worry--the greater part of the battle will have been won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Presume he could suspend it . . . send it to the Supreme Court . . . ???
Even Congress can't make unConstitutional laws --

Don't recall on this -- did the Supremes ever rule on it?

Not that what the 5 do is anything but rubber stamping criminal activity - !!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Arguably he can suspend discharges. It's disputed.
I don't know enough to say who's right.

The Supreme Court hasn't ruled on it, and Obama can't send it to the Supreme Court; only private litigation can do that, and that will take a long time. The repeal compromise that will soon become law will probably end DADT faster than a court challenge now would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC